Featured Product

    ESRB Issues Opinion on Enhancing Framework for Structural Buffers

    February 27, 2018

    ESRB published its final report on the use of structural macro-prudential instruments in the EU. It also issued an Opinion to EC with proposals on enhancing the EU legal framework for structural buffers. In the last three years, authorities have increasingly required EU banks to apply a systemic risk buffer and a systemically important institutions buffer in their own funds calculations. Based on this, ESRB has revised its Handbook and published the proposals to improve the macro-prudential toolkit.

    In the final report, ESRB published its analysis of the use of structural buffers in the EU over the last three years. The structural buffers include the buffer for global systemically important institutions (G-SIIs), the buffer for other systemically important institutions (O-SIIs), and the systemic risk buffer (SRB). ESRB, in its opinion to EC, proposes ways to enhance the EU legal framework for structural buffers, which would strengthen macro-prudential policy and protect the Single Market. These policy considerations should not be understood as formal ESRB warnings or recommendations, as defined by Article 16 of the ESRB Regulation. The main proposals include:

    • Substantial increase in the O-SII cap from 2% to 3%, with the possibility for designated authorities to impose buffers higher than 3%, subject to EC approval
    • Substantial increase in the additional O-SII buffer cap on subsidiaries: the O-SII buffer for subsidiaries of EU parent institutions should not exceed the fully phased-in O-SII or G-SII buffer applicable to the group at consolidated level by more than 2 percentage points
    • Upgrade of the SRB to the status of a dedicated instrument targeting structural systemic risk. This would require the possibility of a sectoral application of the instrument and of multiple SRB applications, to allow authorities to address distinct specific risk;
    • Delineation of the SRB and O-SII buffer; structural buffers should be additive in so far as they target different systemic risks
    • Simplification and clarification of the processes and improvements in transparency

    Based on the experience with structural buffers and on economic analysis, additional guidance for national authorities has been included in the revised ESRB Handbook; this includes guidance on O-SII buffer calibration; a common understanding of the categories of long-term non-cyclical risks that the SRB can address; clarification of procedural aspects of SRB application; cooperation among authorities; and potential use of the leverage ratio to complement structural buffers.


    Related Links

    Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Systemic Risk Buffer, G-SII, O-SII, Systemic Risk, Macro-prudential Tools, ESRB

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    HKMA Announces Liquidity Measures in Response to COVID-19 Outbreak

    HKMA issued a circular on liquidity measures that HKMA has taken or plans to take in response to COVID-19 outbreak.

    April 03, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BaFin Lowers Countercyclical Capital Buffer Amid COVID-19 Outbreak

    BaFin published a general order to lower the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) from 0.25% to 0% as of April 01, 2020.

    April 03, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ESMA Updates Risk Assessment in Light of COVID-19

    ESMA updated its risk assessment to account for the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

    April 02, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FSB Outlines and Reprioritizes Its Work to Address COVID-19 Risks

    FSB published a statement that outlines its work toward addressing the financial stability risks posed by COVID-19, along with the reprioritization of its work program for 2020.

    April 02, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EIOPA Announces Measures to Address the Impact of COVID-19

    Due to the outbreak of COVID-19, EIOPA is re-prioritizing and alleviating the burden by extending the deadlines or delaying projects where input from national competent authorities and/or industry is foreseen.

    April 02, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Guidelines on Use of Payment Moratoria to Address Liquidity Issues

    EBA published detailed guidance on the treatment of legislative and non-legislative moratoria on loan repayments to be applied before June 30, 2020, in light of the COVID-19 crisis.

    April 02, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Outlines Approach to Reporting and Disclosures Amid COVID-19

    PRA published a statement to outline its approach to regulatory reporting and Pillar 3 disclosures for UK banks, building societies, designated investment firms, and credit unions.

    April 02, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Finalizes Certain Modeling Issues for Solvency II Internal Models

    PRA published a statement (PS9/20) that sets out the final policy on modeling of income-producing real estate loans and internal credit assessment for illiquid, unrated assets within the Solvency II internal models.

    April 02, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EIOPA Issues Statement on Mitigating Impact of COVID-19 Outbreak

    EIOPA issued a statement to insurers and intermediaries, urging them to take steps to mitigate the impact of COVID-19 on consumers.

    April 01, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA on Changes to Reporting Obligations for Banks Due to COVID-19

    APRA, in collaboration with the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) and the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS), published a letter outlining temporary changes in reporting obligations for authorized deposit-taking institutions and registered financial corporations, in response to COVID-19.

    April 01, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 4936