OSFI Updates NCCF Returns, Consults on Mortgage Underwriting Guideline
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) updated the Financial Information Committee (FIC) regulatory forms and instructions for the Net Cumulative Cash Flow or NCCF (Form 660). As part of this update Form 660 NCCF return will be decommissioned and replaced by three separate returns, which are expected to be effective from April 30, 2023. These three returns are applicable to different categories of Small and Medium-Sized Banks or SMSBs: Comprehensive NCCF for D-SIBs and Category 1 SMSBs, Streamlined NCCF for Category II SMSBs, and the Operating Cash Flow Statement Category II SMSBs. The NCCF returns are to be completed using the prescribed methodologies and calculations and are in line with the Liquidity Adequacy Requirements from OSFI. Any resulting updates to the validation rule reports or the XML/XSD schemas will be published on the OSFI Web site later. OSFI is also seeking stakeholder feedback on revisions to the Guideline B-20, with respect to a set of proposed complementary debt serviceability measures aimed at better managing the prudential risks arising from high consumer indebtedness. The feedback is expected to be submitted by April 14, 2023.
In the Annual Risk Outlook 2022-23, OSFI committed to initiating consultations on the B-20 Guideline in the first calendar quarter of 2023. In this consultation, the proposed debt-serviceability measures include loan-to-income (LTI) and debt-to-income (DTI) ratios that restrict mortgage debt or total indebtedness as a multiple, or percentage, of borrower income. The proposed measures also include the debt service coverage ratio, which restricts ongoing debt service obligations as a percentage of borrower income, and the interest rate affordability stress tests, which is a minimum interest rate that is applied in debt service coverage calculations to test the ability of a borrower to afford higher debt payments in the event of negative financial shocks. These measures could be implemented at the loan and the lender levels. At the lender level, limits can also be applied at different levels of measurement, restricting either the dollar value or count of the flow, or volume, of new mortgages underwritten, or stock of outstanding mortgages. OSFI may publish interim guidance to the industry based on this consultation; therefore, it is seeking inputs on the following:
- Proposal to adopt a high loan-to-income threshold of 4.5x, with a 25% quarterly volume limit on originations that exceed this threshold. The proposed limit would apply to the total dollar value of quarterly originations. Compared to a restriction on loan count, this would limit incentives to concentrate high loan-to-income lending in a small number of loans
- Consideration on the formulas and definitions for Gross Debt Service and Total Debt Service and whether to adopt those that currently exist for insured mortgages
- Appropriate Gross Debt Service and Total Debt Service thresholds for uninsured mortgages, which could involve graduated or tiered limits
- An explicit amortization limit used for qualification in B-20 Guideline that, in combination with debt service ratio restrictions, would limit excessive leverage
- An explicit principles-based expectation that lenders establish, monitor and report on different Minimum Qualifying Rates, or MQRs, in addition to the current Minimum Qualifying Rate set in regulation, according to different risk characteristics and product types
- Expectation that the Minimum Qualifying Rate be applied to a borrower’s total debt service (that is, for other existing mortgages and non-mortgage debt obligations), in addition to gross debt service
- Tests of affordability and other debt serviceability measures for non-mortgage retail lending outside of the B-20 Guideline.
In 2023, OSFI will conduct a full review of B-20, starting with this initial consultation on debt-serviceability measures and examining the additional tools to preserve credit quality and sound underwriting at the federally regulated financial institutions. The inputs received will inform revisions to B-20, which will be issued for public consultation at a future date. OSFI may also publish an interim guidance to the industry, based on this consultation.
Related Links
Keywords: Americas, Canada, Banking, Basel, Reporting, Lending, Macro-Prudential Policy, Credit Risk, Liquidity Risk, NCCF Returns, OSFI
Featured Experts
María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer
Nicolas Degruson
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.
Patrycja Oleksza
Applies proficiency and knowledge to regulatory capital and reporting analysis and coordinates business and product strategies in the banking technology area
Previous Article
NGFS Seeks Public Feedback on Climate Risk Assessment ScenariosRelated Articles
BIS and Central Banks Experiment with GenAI to Assess Climate Risks
A recent report from the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub details Project Gaia, a collaboration between the BIS Innovation Hub Eurosystem Center and certain central banks in Europe
Nearly 25% G-SIBs Commit to Adopting TNFD Nature-Related Disclosures
Nature-related risks are increasing in severity and frequency, affecting businesses, capital providers, financial systems, and economies.
Singapore to Mandate Climate Disclosures from FY2025
Singapore recently took a significant step toward turning climate ambition into action, with the introduction of mandatory climate-related disclosures for listed and large non-listed companies
SEC Finalizes Climate-Related Disclosures Rule
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has finalized the long-awaited rule that mandates climate-related disclosures for domestic and foreign publicly listed companies in the U.S.
EBA Proposes Standards Related to Standardized Credit Risk Approach
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has been taking significant steps toward implementing the Basel III framework and strengthening the regulatory framework for credit institutions in the EU
US Regulators Release Stress Test Scenarios for Banks
The U.S. regulators recently released baseline and severely adverse scenarios, along with other details, for stress testing the banks in 2024. The relevant U.S. banking regulators are the Federal Reserve Bank (FED), the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC).
Asian Governments Aim for Interoperability in AI Governance Frameworks
The regulatory landscape for artificial intelligence (AI), including the generative kind, is evolving rapidly, with governments and regulators aiming to address the challenges and opportunities presented by this transformative technology.
EBA Proposes Operational Risk Standards Under Final Basel III Package
The European Union (EU) has been working on the final elements of Basel III standards, with endorsement of the Banking Package and the publication of the European Banking Authority (EBA) roadmap on Basel III implementation in December 2023.
EFRAG Proposes XBRL Taxonomy and Standard for Listed SMEs Under ESRS
The European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG), which plays a crucial role in shaping corporate reporting standards in European Union (EU), is seeking comments, until May 21, 2024, on the Exposure Draft ESRS for listed SMEs.
ECB to Expand Climate Change Work in 2024-2025
Banking regulators worldwide are increasingly focusing on addressing, monitoring, and supervising the institutions' exposure to climate and environmental risks.
