HKMA issued a consultation on the Supervisory Policy Manual module CA-G-1, which provides an overview of the capital adequacy regime for locally incorporated authorized institutions. The manual sets out HKMA policy on capital adequacy for authorized institutions incorporated in Hong Kong and provides an overview of the framework for the calculation of the capital adequacy ratio of these authorized institutions. In the proposed Policy Manual, HKMA also announced that the implementation of the standardized approach for measuring counterparty credit risk exposures (SA-CCR) and the standard on capital requirements for bank exposures to central counterparties (CCPs) is targeted at around the end of 2020, to more closely track the implementation schedules in other major jurisdictions.
The HKMA policy on capital adequacy closely reflects the latest regulatory capital standards published by BCBS. From January 01, 2013, HKMA had commenced the implementation of Basel III capital standards in Hong Kong, in accordance with the transitional arrangements specified by BCBS. Sections 2 to 15 of the module present an overview of the capital standards under Basel III that are currently effective in Hong Kong while Section 16 of the module briefly outlines the key capital standards that are to be implemented in the near future.
Section 16 of the supervisory policy manual on capital adequacy regime states that proposed amendments to the Banking (Capital) Rules (BCR) are being prepared for the implementation of three sets of BCBS capital standards relating to the treatment of banks’ counterparty credit risk exposures and their equity investments in funds. These standards are:
- SA-CCR standard—to replace the existing Current Exposure Method (CEM) for calculating the exposure amount of counterparty credit risk arising from derivative contracts, with enhancements to better reflect the effects of margining, the level of volatilities observed during recent stress periods, and the netting benefits.
- Capital requirements for bank exposures to central counterparties (CCP standard)—to ensure that banks adequately capitalize their exposures to CCPs and that there are incentives for banks to mitigate counterparty credit risk through central clearing. The new standards replace the existing two methods for calculating the capital charge of default fund contributions made by banks to qualifying CCPs, with a new approach under which the SA-CCR, instead of the CEM, will be used to determine a qualifying CCP’s counterparty credit risk exposures to its clearing members.
- Capital requirements for banks’ equity investments in funds (EIF standard)—to clarify the existing capital treatment for equity investments in investment funds under Basel II by introducing enhancements to reflect directly the risks.
Subject to the required rule-drafting and legislative processes, the implementation of the SA-CCR and the CCP standard is targeted at around the end of 2020 to track more closely the implementation schedules in other major jurisdictions. For the EIF standard, the proposed amendments to the BCR are being prepared in consultation with the industry.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Hong Kong, Banking, Capital Adequacy, Capital Adequacy Ratio, Basel III, BCR, SA-CCR, CCP Exposures, Equity Investment in Funds, HKMA
Previous ArticleFSB Publishes Progress Report on Interest Rate Benchmark Reforms
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has published the findings of its latest climate risk self-assessment survey conducted across the banking, insurance, and superannuation industries.
The French Prudential Supervisory Authority (ACPR) published a notice related to the methods for calculating and publishing prudential ratios under the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD IV) and the minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL).
The European Insurance and Occupational Pension Authority (EIOPA) published the risk dashboard based on Solvency II data and the final version of the application guidance on climate change materiality assessments and climate change scenarios in the Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA).
The European Banking Authority (EBA) and the European Central Bank (ECB) published their responses to the consultations of the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) and the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) on sustainability-related disclosure standards.
A Consultative Group on Risk Management (CGRM) at the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) published a report that examines incorporation of climate risks into the international reserve management framework.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final guidelines on liquidity requirements exemption for investment firms, updated version of its 5.2 filing rules document for supervisory reporting, and Single Rulebook Question and Answer (Q&A) updates in July 2022.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published Version 2.8.0 of the Solvency II data point model (DPM) and XBRL taxonomy.
The European Union published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, an opinion from the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC); the opinion is on the proposal for a regulation to amend the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
HM Treasury published a draft statutory instrument titled “The Financial Services (Miscellaneous Amendments) (EU Exit) Regulations 2022,” along with the related explanatory memorandum and impact assessment.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) is seeking comments, until October 21, 2022, on the introduction of CPS 230, which is the new cross-industry prudential standard on operational risk management.