HKMA issued a consultation on the Supervisory Policy Manual module CA-G-1, which provides an overview of the capital adequacy regime for locally incorporated authorized institutions. The manual sets out HKMA policy on capital adequacy for authorized institutions incorporated in Hong Kong and provides an overview of the framework for the calculation of the capital adequacy ratio of these authorized institutions. In the proposed Policy Manual, HKMA also announced that the implementation of the standardized approach for measuring counterparty credit risk exposures (SA-CCR) and the standard on capital requirements for bank exposures to central counterparties (CCPs) is targeted at around the end of 2020, to more closely track the implementation schedules in other major jurisdictions.
The HKMA policy on capital adequacy closely reflects the latest regulatory capital standards published by BCBS. From January 01, 2013, HKMA had commenced the implementation of Basel III capital standards in Hong Kong, in accordance with the transitional arrangements specified by BCBS. Sections 2 to 15 of the module present an overview of the capital standards under Basel III that are currently effective in Hong Kong while Section 16 of the module briefly outlines the key capital standards that are to be implemented in the near future.
Section 16 of the supervisory policy manual on capital adequacy regime states that proposed amendments to the Banking (Capital) Rules (BCR) are being prepared for the implementation of three sets of BCBS capital standards relating to the treatment of banks’ counterparty credit risk exposures and their equity investments in funds. These standards are:
- SA-CCR standard—to replace the existing Current Exposure Method (CEM) for calculating the exposure amount of counterparty credit risk arising from derivative contracts, with enhancements to better reflect the effects of margining, the level of volatilities observed during recent stress periods, and the netting benefits.
- Capital requirements for bank exposures to central counterparties (CCP standard)—to ensure that banks adequately capitalize their exposures to CCPs and that there are incentives for banks to mitigate counterparty credit risk through central clearing. The new standards replace the existing two methods for calculating the capital charge of default fund contributions made by banks to qualifying CCPs, with a new approach under which the SA-CCR, instead of the CEM, will be used to determine a qualifying CCP’s counterparty credit risk exposures to its clearing members.
- Capital requirements for banks’ equity investments in funds (EIF standard)—to clarify the existing capital treatment for equity investments in investment funds under Basel II by introducing enhancements to reflect directly the risks.
Subject to the required rule-drafting and legislative processes, the implementation of the SA-CCR and the CCP standard is targeted at around the end of 2020 to track more closely the implementation schedules in other major jurisdictions. For the EIF standard, the proposed amendments to the BCR are being prepared in consultation with the industry.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Hong Kong, Banking, Capital Adequacy, Capital Adequacy Ratio, Basel III, BCR, SA-CCR, CCP Exposures, Equity Investment in Funds, HKMA
Previous ArticleFSB Publishes Progress Report on Interest Rate Benchmark Reforms
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the final policy statement PS21/21 on the leverage ratio framework in the UK. PS21/21, which sets out the final policy of both the Financial Policy Committee (FPC) and PRA
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) proposed to amend Regulation B to implement changes to the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) under Section 1071 of the Dodd-Frank Act.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) decided to maintain, at the 2019 levels, the buffer rates for the Other Systemically Important Institutions (O-SII) for another year, with no new rates to be set until December 2023.
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a progress report on implementation of its high-level recommendations for the regulation, supervision, and oversight of global stablecoin arrangements.
In a letter to the authorized deposit taking institutions, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) announced an increase in the minimum interest rate buffer it expects banks to use when assessing the serviceability of home loan applications.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) are consulting on the preliminary guidance that clarifies that stablecoin arrangements should observe international standards for payment, clearing, and settlement systems.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) have set out their respective work priorities for 2022.
The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) updated the guidelines on supervisory reporting requirements under the reporting framework 3.0, in addition to the reporting module on leverage under the common reporting (COREP) framework.
The European Commission (EC) published the Implementing Decision 2021/1753 on the equivalence of supervisory and regulatory requirements of certain third countries and territories for the purposes of the treatment of exposures, in accordance with the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR (575/2013).
EC published the Implementing Regulation 2021/1751, which lays down implementing technical standards on uniform formats and templates for notification of determination of the impracticability of including contractual recognition of write-down and conversion powers.