APRA published a letter to the authorized deposit-taking institutions outlining the regulatory capital treatment of their equity investments in the Australian Business Growth Fund (ABGF). APRA is adjusting its capital framework for authorized deposit-taking institutions to support the establishment of the ABGF. The ABGF is a joint initiative between the Australian government and financial investors to provide longer term equity funding to small and medium-size enterprises (SMEs). APRA supports the establishment of the fund as an initiative to enhance financing options for SMEs.
An authorized deposit-taking institution that invests in the ABGF will be able to apply a risk-weight of 250% to their investment. This compares to the current capital treatment of a full deduction from common equity tier 1 (CET1) capital for these investments. The inclusion of the Australian government as a founding shareholder in the ABGF supports APRA providing a special treatment, subject to prudential safeguards, for this investment compared to other equity investments.
To ensure that risks, to authorized deposit-taking institutions, of investing in the ABGF are contained, an authorized deposit-taking institution will only be able to invest up to 2% of its Level 1 CET1 Capital in the ABGF. Any additional equity investment beyond that amount will not be eligible for the 250% risk-weight and would be treated according to APRA’s usual prudential requirement of deduction from CET1 Capital. Where an authorized deposit-taking institution investor in the ABGF has an undrawn contractual commitment to invest in the ABGF, it may assign a 20% credit conversion factor to this commitment for capital adequacy purposes. An authorized deposit-taking institution must notify its Responsible Supervisor if it is participating in the ABGF.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Australia, Banking, CET 1, Capital Framework, Regulatory Capital, Australian Business Growth Fund, Risk-Weighted Assets, Basel III, APRA
Previous ArticleIMF Paper Studies Optimal Design of a Central Bank Digital Currency
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published four draft principles to support supervisory efforts in assessing the representativeness of COVID-19-impacted data for banks using the internal ratings based (IRB) credit risk models.
The European Council and the European Parliament (EP) reached a provisional political agreement on the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD).
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) launched a consultation (CP6/22) that sets out proposal for a new Supervisory Statement on expectations for management of model risk by banks.
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2022/954, which amends regulatory technical standards on specification of the calculation of specific and general credit risk adjustments.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub updated its work program, announcing a set of projects across various centers.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published two consultation papers—one on the supervisory statement on exclusions related to systemic events and the other on the supervisory statement on the management of non-affirmative cyber exposures.
Certain members of the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs issued a letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published a consultation paper on the advice on the review of the securitization prudential framework in Solvency II.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) issued a statement on PRA buffer adjustment while the Bank of England (BoE) published a notice on the statistical reporting requirements for banks.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) issued principles for the effective management and supervision of climate-related financial risks.