RBNZ Proposes to Reinstate LVR Restrictions from March 2021
RBNZ is consulting on the reinstatement of loan-to-value ratio (LVR) restrictions on residential mortgage lending from March 01, 2021. LVR restrictions set a ceiling on the percentage of new mortgage lending banks can offer at high LVRs. RBNZ intends to reinstate the LVR restrictions at the same level as before the onset of COVID-19, when the ceiling had been set at a maximum of 20% of new lending to owner-occupiers at LVRs above 80% and at 5% of new lending to investors at LVRs above 70% (after exemptions). The consultation paper also presents an initial analysis of the likely impact of reinstating LVR restrictions. The consultation period ends on January 22, 2021. RBNZ expects to release the final decision in February 2021, along with a summary of the submissions received and a regulatory impact assessment.
LVR restrictions were removed in April 2020 to best ensure that credit could flow and to avoid an adverse impact on the mortgage deferral scheme implemented in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Reinstating LVR restrictions from March 01, 2021 will give banks time to clear their existing pipelines of high LVR loans that have been approved but not yet settled. In practice it is likely that new high-LVR lending will decrease well before the reinstatement date as banks prepare for the introduction of new restrictions. The proposed policy change would be enacted by re-introducing section BS19 of the Banking Supervision Handbook (Framework for restrictions on high-LVR lending). This will require a change to banks’ Conditions of Registration. If the decision to reinstate LVR restrictions is confirmed, RBNZ will run a short consultation (minimum seven days) on the required changes to Conditions of Registration to implement the LVR restrictions.
LVR restrictions are one of the macro-prudential policy tools of RBNZ. The LVR restrictions on residential mortgage lending support financial stability, by building financial system resilience against a disorderly correction in the housing market and by dampening excessive growth in credit. By placing limits on high-risk lending, LVR restrictions can make household and bank balance sheets more resilient to a correction in property values if that occurs. This, in turn, can help avoid a negative feedback loop emerging in the housing market. In this situation, an initial correction causes some borrowers to move into negative equity, which then incentivizes further "fire sales" of property that depress the market further. By limiting highly leveraged purchasing, LVR restrictions may help moderate house price volatility. The LVR restrictions can also moderate the scale of economic downturns by reducing household indebtedness and enhancing borrower balance sheets.
Related Links
Comment Due Date: January 22, 2021
Keywords: Asia Pacific, New Zealand, Banking, COVID-19, LVR Restrictions, Regulatory Capital, Credit Risk, Macro-Prudential Policy, Residential Mortgage Lending, Basel, RBNZ
Featured Experts
María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer
Victor Calanog, Ph.D.
Leading economist; commercial real estate; performance forecasting, econometric infrastructure; data modeling; credit risk modeling; portfolio assessment; custom commercial real estate analysis; thought leader.
Nicolas Degruson
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.
Previous Article
IAIS Consults on Application Paper on Resolution Powers and PlanningRelated Articles
FINMA Approves Merger of Credit Suisse and UBS
The Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) has approved the takeover of Credit Suisse by UBS.
BOE Sets Out Its Thinking on Regulatory Capital and Climate Risks
The Bank of England (BOE) published a working paper that aims to understand the climate-related disclosures of UK financial institutions.
OSFI Finalizes on Climate Risk Guideline, Issues Other Updates
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) is seeking comments, until May 31, 2023, on the draft guideline on culture and behavior risk, with final guideline expected by the end of 2023.
APRA Assesses Macro-Prudential Policy Settings, Issues Other Updates
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published an information paper that assesses its macro-prudential policy settings aimed at promoting stability at a systemic level.
BIS Paper Examines Impact of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on Lending
BIS issued a paper that investigates the effect of the greenhouse gas, or GHG, emissions of firms on bank loans using bank–firm matched data of Japanese listed firms from 2006 to 2018.
HMT Mulls Alignment of Ring-Fencing and Resolution Regimes for Banks
The HM Treasury (HMT) is seeking evidence, until May 07, 2023, on practicalities of aligning the ring-fencing and the banking resolution regimes for banks.
MFSA Sets Out Supervisory Priorities, Issues Reporting Updates
The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) outlined its supervisory priorities for 2023
German Regulators Issue Multiple Reporting Updates for Banks
Deutsche Bundesbank published the nationally deactivated validation rules for the German Commercial Code (HGB) users on the taxonomy 3.2, which became valid from December 31, 2022
BCBS Report Examines Impact of Basel III Framework for Banks
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published results of the Basel III monitoring exercise based on the June 30, 2022 data.
PRA Consults on Prudential Rules for "Simpler-Regime" Firms
Among the recent regulatory updates from UK authorities, a key development is the first-phase consultation, from the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), on simplifications to the prudential framework that would apply to the simpler-regime firms.
