HKMA revised the guidelines on credit risk management for personal lending business of authorized institution. The revisions are aimed to provide greater flexibility to authorized institutions in the use of new credit risk management tools powered by financial technology. The guidelines allow authorized institutions to carve out a small portion of their personal lending portfolio as New Personal-Lending Portfolio (NPP) and apply innovative credit analytic tools built on financial technology to assess and approve credit applications.
As part of the Banking Made Easy initiative, HKMA had issued the guidelines in May 2018. Several authorized institutions have since rolled out new retail credit products following the guidelines and the business has been operating smoothly. In view of this latest development, HKMA considers that it is no longer necessary to set an across-the-board limit applicable to all authorized institutions on such lending (that is, 10% of the capital base of an authorized institution). Instead, HKMA expects authorized institutions intending to develop this business to set a limit of their own, which should be commensurate with their risk appetite and risk management capability. The guidelines have, therefore, been updated and are available in the Annex to the circular.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Hong Kong, Banking, Credit Risk, Personal Lending Portfolio, Fintech, Risk Appetite, HKMA
Previous ArticleFSI Summarizes Scope of Application of Basel Framework
Next ArticleIASB Publishes Meeting Updates for August 2019
EIOPA submitted—to the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union, and EC—its 2020, fifth, and last annual report on long-term guarantee measures and measures on equity risk.
The BIS Innovation Hub Swiss Centre, SNB, and the financial infrastructure operator SIX announced the successful completion of a joint proof-of-concept (PoC) experiment as part of the Project Helvetia.
EBA published the final draft regulatory technical standards for calculation of own funds requirements for market risk, under the standardized and internal model approaches of the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) framework.
EIOPA published discussion paper on a methodology for the potential inclusion of climate change in the Solvency II (sometimes also written as SII) standard formula when calculating natural catastrophe underwriting risk.
EU published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, corrigenda to the Directive and the Regulation on the prudential requirements and supervision of investment firms.
MAS proposed amendments to certain regulations, notices, and guidelines arising from the Banking (Amendment) Act 2020.
PRA published a statement that explains when to expect further information on the PRA approach to transposing the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5), including its approach to revisions to the definition of capital for Pillar 2A.
RBNZ launched consultations on the scope of the Insurance Prudential Supervision Act (IPSA) 2010 and on the associated Insurance Solvency Standards.
SRB published the work program for 2021-2023, setting out a roadmap to further operationalize the Single Resolution Fund and to achieve robust resolvability of banks under its remit over the next three years.
EIOPA is consulting on the relevant ratios to be mandatorily disclosed by insurers and reinsurers falling within the scope of the Non-Financial Reporting Directive as well as on the methodologies to build these ratios.