RBI Circular Addresses Measurement of Capital Charge for Market Risk
RBI issued a circular that addresses the treatment of debt mutual funds/exchange-traded funds (ETFs) while computing capital charge for market risk under the Basel III capital regulations. According to Para 8.4.1 of the Master Circular on Basel III capital regulations, capital charge for equities is applicable to units of mutual funds. This recent circular details the RBI decision on computation of capital charge for market risk for the banks investing in a debt mutual fund/ETF with underlying comprising the Central, State, and Foreign Central Governments’ bonds; bank bonds; and corporate bonds (other than bank bonds).
Under the Basel III capital rules in the Master Circular, the minimum capital requirement is expressed in terms of two separately calculated charges. One is the "specific risk" charge for each security, which is designed to protect against an adverse movement in the price of an individual security owing to factors related to the individual issuer, both for short (short position is not allowed in India except in derivatives and Central Government Securities) and long positions. The other is the "general market risk" charge toward interest rate risk in the portfolio, where long and short positions (which is not allowed in India except in derivatives and Central Government Securities) in different securities or instruments can be offset. The circular covers the following points with respect to the computation of capital charge for market risk:
- Investment in debt mutual fund/ETF, for which full constituent debt details are available, shall attract general market risk charge of 9%, as hitherto. Additionally, the Annex to this recent circular details the application of specific risk capital charge for exposures to securities issued by Indian and foreign sovereigns, bonds issued by banks, and corporate bonds (other than bank bonds).
- In case of debt mutual fund/ETF, which contains a mix of the debt instruments, the specific risk capital charge shall be computed based on the lowest rated debt instrument or instrument attracting the highest specific risk capital charge in the fund.
- Debt mutual fund/ETF, for which constituent debt details are not available, at least as of each month-end, shall continue to be treated on par with equity for computation of capital charge for market risk, as prescribed in Para 8.4.1 of the Master Circular on Basel III capital regulations.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, India, Banking, Basel, Regulatory Capital, Market Risk, Mutual Funds, ETF, RBI
Featured Experts
María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer
Nicolas Degruson
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.
Patrycja Oleksza
Applies proficiency and knowledge to regulatory capital and reporting analysis and coordinates business and product strategies in the banking technology area
Previous Article
RBI Announces Additional Regulatory Policy Measures Amid PandemicRelated Articles
BSP Tackles Aspects of Lending and Islamic, Open & Sustainable Finance
The Central Bank of the Philippines (BSP) issued communications covering developments related to online lending platforms, open finance framework and roadmap, and on the expected regulations in the area sustainable finance.
US Agencies Issue Regulatory Updates, FDIC Launches Tech Sprint
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FED) published the final rule that amends Regulation I to reduce the quarterly reporting burden for member banks by automating the application process for adjusting their subscriptions to the Federal Reserve Bank capital stock, except in the context of mergers.
EBA Issues Guide on Bank Resolvability, Consults on Transferability
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published its assessment of risks through the quarterly Risk Dashboard and the results of the Autumn edition of the Risk Assessment Questionnaire (RAQ).
MFSA Publishes CRD5 Updates and Supervisory Priorities for 2022
The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) updated the guidelines on supervisory reporting requirements under the reporting framework 3.0.
HKMA Extends Repayment for Trade Facilities, Consults on Crypto-Assets
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) published a circular, along with the reporting form and instructions, for self-assessment, by authorized institutions, of compliance with the Code of Banking Practice 2021.
FCA Registers Securitization Repositories; PRA Issues 2022 Priorities
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) decided to register European DataWarehouse Ltd and SecRep Limited as securitization repositories under the UK Securitization Regulation, with effect from January 17, 2022.
EC Regulation Sets Out Methods for Measuring K-Factors Under IFR
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2022/25, which supplements the Investment Firms Regulation (IFR or Regulation 2019/2033) with respect to the regulatory technical standards specifying the methods for measuring the K-factors referred to in Article 15 of the IFR.
BIS Studies How Platform Models Impact Financial Stability & Inclusion
The Bank of International Settlements (BIS) published a paper that assesses the ways in which platform-based business models can affect financial inclusion, competition, financial stability and consumer protection.
CBE Issues Additional Measures to Ease Disruptions from Pandemic
The Central Bank of Egypt (CBE) published a circular with instructions on emergency liquidity assistance to banks that are unable to meet their liquidity requirements.
ESAs Publish List of Financial Conglomerates for 2021
The European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) published the list of identified financial conglomerates for 2021.
