APRA recently approved the acquisition of 86 400 by the National Australia Bank Limited, allowing the bank to hold a 100% stake in 86 400 Holdings Ltd and 86 400 Ltd, subject to the relevant scheme of arrangement between 86 400 Limited and its members receiving court approval under the Corporations Act. In another update, APRA answered a frequently asked question (FAQ) to clarify the treatment of rural exposures as commercial property and income-producing real estate by the internal ratings-based (IRB) authorized deposit-taking institutions. The regulatory requirements for the clarified treatment are part of the reporting standard on commercial property (ARS 230.0) and the prudential standard and guide (APS 113 and APG 113, respectively) on IRB approach to credit risk.
The instruction guide for the ARS 230.0 clarifies that rural exposures will generally not meet the definition of commercial property, unless the property has been acquired specifically for lease or resale and the servicing of the debt is dependent on such lease or resale (and/or the lease or resale of other properties). However, APRA considers that it would be appropriate to treat rural exposures as commercial property exposures where both of these conditions are met:
- the property has been acquired specifically for lease or resale,
- the servicing of the debt is dependent on such lease or resale
Where an internal ratings-based institution satisfies itself that the exposure can be appropriately serviced on a principal and interest basis over a commercial term, by looking through any lease arrangement to the underlying productive capacity of the rural land based on normal seasonal conditions, then it may consider that the second condition is not met and the exposure does not require classification as commercial property exposure for reporting purposes under ARS 230.0.
APG 113 paragraph 3(d) provides guidance on what constitutes income-producing real estate (as covered by APS 113 paragraph 43) and notes the primary dependence on cashflows generated by the property (generally through lease income or resale) for repayment of the obligation; it further considers that the distinguishing characteristic of income-producing real estate is that there is a strong correlation between the prospects of repayment and prospects for recovery in the event of default. Where an authorized institution considers a rural exposure in terms of the underlying productive capacity of the rural property, in many cases neither the primary dependence test nor the strong correlation test would be met. In these cases, the exposure need not be considered as income-producing real estate and could be risk-weighted under the advanced or foundation IRB approach rather than according to the slotting approach for specialized lending exposures. Given this distinction, APRA expects that these exposures and their respective valuations would be considered by an agricultural lending specialist team, rather than a commercial property specialist team, should any such teams be in place at the particular IRB authorized deposit-taking institution.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Australia, Banking, IRB Approach, Credit Risk, Reporting, National Australia Bank, 86400 Ltd, FAQ, CRE, Basel, Regulatory Capital, APRA
Previous ArticlePRA Proposes Options for Regulatory Framework for Non-Systemic Banks
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2021/1527 with regard to the regulatory technical standards for the contractual recognition of write down and conversion powers.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published a new set of frequently asked questions (FAQs) to provide guidance to authorized deposit-taking institutions on the interpretation of APS 120, the prudential standard on securitization.
The Single Resolution Board (SRB) published a Communication on the application of regulatory technical standard provisions on prior permission for reducing eligible liabilities instruments as of January 01, 2022.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published a new set of frequently asked questions (FAQs) to clarify the regulatory capital treatment of investments in the overseas deposit-taking and insurance subsidiaries.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final report on the guidelines specifying the criteria to assess the exceptional cases when institutions exceed the large exposure limits and the time and measures needed for institutions to return to compliance.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) issued the policy statement PS20/21, which contains final rules for the application of existing consolidated prudential requirements to financial holding companies and mixed financial holding companies.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) revised the guidelines on stress tests to be conducted by the national deposit guarantee schemes under the Deposit Guarantee Schemes Directive (DGSD).
The European Commission (EC) announced that Nordea Bank has signed a guarantee agreement with the European Investment Bank (EIB) Group to support the sustainable transformation of businesses in the Nordics.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) issued a circular, for all authorized institutions, to confirm its support of an information note that sets out various options available in the loan market for replacing USD LIBOR with the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR).
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued a new "Problem Bank Supervision" booklet of the Comptroller's Handbook. The booklet covers information on timely identification and rehabilitation of problem banks and their advanced supervision, enforcement, and resolution when conditions warrant.