IOSCO Report Sets Out Next Steps for Work on Sustainable Finance
IOSCO published a report that examines the sustainable finance initiatives by the securities regulators and the industry. It offers a detailed analysis of the most relevant international initiatives and third-party frameworks and standards related to the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) factors. The report also identifies a number of improvement areas and articulates the need for IOSCO to play a key role in this area. The report finds that lack of consistency and comparability across third-party frameworks could create an obstacle to cross-border financial activities and raise investor protection concerns.
The report highlights three recurring themes that involve multiple and diverse sustainability frameworks and standards—namely, sustainability-related disclosures, a lack of common definitions of sustainable activities, and greenwashing and other challenges to investor protection. The report indicates that many issuers and asset managers operating cross-border may be subject to different regulatory regimes or participate in multiple regional or international third-party initiatives. The wide variety of regulatory regimes and initiatives, often with inconsistent objectives and requirements, may prevent stakeholders from fully understanding the risks and opportunities that sustainable business activities entail. As a next step, to overcome these identified challenges, IOSCO has decided to establish a Sustainability Task Force with a mandate to address transparency and promote investor protection.
The Task Force will work to improve sustainability-related disclosures made by issuers and asset managers, collaborate with international organizations and regulators to avoid effort duplication, enhance coordination of relevant regulatory and supervisory approaches, and conduct case studies and analyses of transparency, investor protection, and other relevant issues within sustainable finance. The key work of the Task Force will be to:
- Improve sustainability–related disclosures by issuers and asset managers. To this end, the Task Force will identify and develop categories of disclosure that are material for investors and that are capable of falling within the supervisory and regulatory competence of securities regulators.
- Assist IOSCO members to identify and address greenwashing and other investor protection concerns. The Task Force would examine categories of disclosure to assess whether industry specific or more broad metrics would provide decision useful information and comparability between different issuers. The Task Force would also engage with the industry, voluntary third-party disclosure standard-setters and other relevant organizations.
- Address relevant issues within sustainable finance. These issues could include transparency issues among ESG data providers, disclosure of methods and governance among credit rating agencies and ESG rating agencies, practices and experiences of asset managers on the use of sustainability-related factors in investment decisions processes, and risks of greenwashing in the market for sustainable investment products.
Related Links
Keywords: International, Banking, Securities, ESG, Climate Change Risk, Sustainable Finance, Transparency, Disclosure, Systemic Risk, Sustainability Task Force, Credit Rating Agencies, IOSCO
Featured Experts
Dr. Samuel W. Malone
Sam leads the quantitative research team within the CreditEdge™ research group. In this role, he develops novel risk and forecasting solutions for financial institutions while providing thought leadership on related trends in global financial markets.
Related Articles
BIS Examines Use of Big Data and Machine Learning at Central Banks
BIS published a paper that provides an overview on the use of big data and machine learning in the central bank community.
APRA Finalizes Reporting Standard for Operational Risk Requirements
APRA finalized the reporting standard ARS 115.0 on capital adequacy with respect to the standardized measurement approach to operational risk for authorized deposit-taking institutions in Australia.
ECB Publishes Guide for Determining Penalties for Regulatory Breaches
ECB published a guide that outlines the principles and methods for calculating the penalties for regulatory breaches of prudential requirements by banks.
MAS Sets Out Good Practices to Manage Operational Risks Amid COVID
MAS and The Association of Banks in Singapore (ABS) jointly issued a paper that sets out good practices for the management of operational and other risks stemming from new work arrangements adopted by financial institutions amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
ACPR Announces New Data Collection Application for Banks and Insurers
ACPR announced that a new data collection application, called DLPP (Datalake for Prudential), for collecting banking and insurance prudential data will go into production on April 12, 2021.
BCB Maintains CCyB at 0%, Initiates First Cycle of Regulatory Sandbox
BCB announced that the Financial Stability Committee decided to maintain the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) for Brazil at 0%, at least until the end of 2021.
EIOPA Launches Study on Non-Life Underwriting Risk in Internal Models
EIOPA has launched a European-wide comparative study on non-life underwriting risk in internal models, also kicking-off of the data collection phase.
SRB Publishes Overview of Resolution Tools Available in Banking Union
SRB published an overview of the resolution tools available in the Banking Union and their impact on a bank’s ability to maintain continuity of access to financial market infrastructure services in resolution.
EBA Consults on Pillar 3 Disclosure Standards for ESG Risks Under CRR
EBA is consulting on the implementing technical standards for Pillar 3 disclosures on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks, as set out in requirements under Article 449a of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
ESAs Issue Advice on KPIs on Sustainability for Nonfinancial Reporting
ESAs Issue Advice on KPIs on Sustainability for Nonfinancial Reporting
