ESAs Publish Advice on Cybersecurity and Management of ICT Risk
ESAs published two pieces of Joint Advice in response to the requests of EC in its March 2018 FinTech Action Plan. One Joint Advice pertains to the need for legislative improvements related to Information and Communication Technology (ICT) risk management requirements in the EU financial sector. The second Joint Advice pertains to the costs and benefits of a coherent cyber resilience testing framework for significant market participants and infrastructures within the EU financial sector.
Regarding the need for legislative improvements, in developing the Joint Advice, ESAs' objective was that every relevant entity should be subject to clear general requirements on governance of ICT, including cybersecurity, to ensure the safe provision of regulated services. Guided by this objective, the proposals presented in the Advice aim to promote stronger operational resilience and harmonization in the EU financial sector by applying changes to their respective sectoral legislation. Incident reporting is highly relevant to ICT risk management and allows relevant entities and authorities to log, monitor, analyze, and respond to ICT operational, ICT security, and fraud incidents. Therefore, ESAs call for streamlining aspects of the incident reporting frameworks across the financial sector. Furthermore, ESAs suggest that a legislative solution for an appropriate oversight framework to monitor the activities of critical third-party service providers should be considered.
Regarding the costs and benefits of a coherent cyber resilience testing framework, ESAs see clear benefits of such a framework. However, there are significant differences on the maturity level of cybersecurity, across and within financial sectors. In the short-term, ESAs advise to focus on achieving a minimum level of cyber-resilience across the sectors, proportionate to the needs and characteristics of the relevant entities. Furthermore, ESAs propose to establish, on a voluntary basis, an EU-wide coherent testing framework, with other relevant authorities (taking into account the existing initiatives) and with a focus on Threat Lead Penetration Testing. In the long-term, ESAs aim to ensure a sufficient cyber maturity level of identified cross-sector entities.
To implement the proposed actions, ESAs highlight the required legal basis and explicit mandate, which is necessary for development and implementation of a coherent resilience testing framework across all financial sectors by ESAs in cooperation with other relevant authorities. EC, in the March 2018 FinTech Action Plan, had specifically requested ESAs to map, by the first quarter of 2019, the existing supervisory practices across financial sectors around ICT security and governance requirements and, where appropriate, to consider issuing guidelines aimed at supervisory convergence and enforcement of ICT risk management and mitigation requirements in the EU financial sector and, if necessary, to provide EC with technical advice on the need for legislative improvements. EC had also requested ESAs to evaluate, by the fourth quarter of 2018 (now Q1 2019), the costs and benefits of developing a coherent cyber resilience testing framework for significant market participants and infrastructures within the EU financial sector.
Related Links
- Press Release
- Advice on Coherent Cyber Resilience Testing Framework (PDF)
- Advice on ICT Legislative Improvements (PDF)
- FinTech Action Plan, March 2018
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Insurance, Securities, Fintech, Cyber Risk, ICT Risk, Operational Risk, Fintech Action Plan, Cyber Resilience, ESAs
Featured Experts

María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer

Dieter Van der Stock
IFRS subject matter expert; LDTI subject matter expert; accounting authority; risk management specialist
Previous Article
MAS Consults on Measures to Strengthen Cyber Resilience of FIsRelated Articles
FINMA Approves Merger of Credit Suisse and UBS
The Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) has approved the takeover of Credit Suisse by UBS.
BOE Sets Out Its Thinking on Regulatory Capital and Climate Risks
The Bank of England (BOE) published a working paper that aims to understand the climate-related disclosures of UK financial institutions.
OSFI Finalizes on Climate Risk Guideline, Issues Other Updates
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) is seeking comments, until May 31, 2023, on the draft guideline on culture and behavior risk, with final guideline expected by the end of 2023.
APRA Assesses Macro-Prudential Policy Settings, Issues Other Updates
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published an information paper that assesses its macro-prudential policy settings aimed at promoting stability at a systemic level.
BIS Paper Examines Impact of Greenhouse Gas Emissions on Lending
BIS issued a paper that investigates the effect of the greenhouse gas, or GHG, emissions of firms on bank loans using bank–firm matched data of Japanese listed firms from 2006 to 2018.
HMT Mulls Alignment of Ring-Fencing and Resolution Regimes for Banks
The HM Treasury (HMT) is seeking evidence, until May 07, 2023, on practicalities of aligning the ring-fencing and the banking resolution regimes for banks.
MFSA Sets Out Supervisory Priorities, Issues Reporting Updates
The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) outlined its supervisory priorities for 2023
German Regulators Issue Multiple Reporting Updates for Banks
Deutsche Bundesbank published the nationally deactivated validation rules for the German Commercial Code (HGB) users on the taxonomy 3.2, which became valid from December 31, 2022
BCBS Report Examines Impact of Basel III Framework for Banks
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published results of the Basel III monitoring exercise based on the June 30, 2022 data.
PRA Consults on Prudential Rules for "Simpler-Regime" Firms
Among the recent regulatory updates from UK authorities, a key development is the first-phase consultation, from the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), on simplifications to the prudential framework that would apply to the simpler-regime firms.