PRA published a statement (PS9/20) that sets out the final policy on modeling of income-producing real estate loans and internal credit assessment for illiquid, unrated assets within the Solvency II internal models. PS9/20 contains the final supervisory statement (SS3/17) on Illiquid unrated assets and provides feedback to responses to the consultation paper CP23/19. The expectations set out in SS3/17 come into effect with the publication of the PS9/20 on April 02, 2020. PS9/20 is relevant to UK insurance and reinsurance companies holding or intending to hold income-producing real estate, or IPRE, loans. It is also relevant to firms investing in illiquid, unrated assets within their Solvency II matching adjustment portfolios.
SS33/17 sets out the PRA expectations in respect of firms investing in illiquid, unrated assets within their Solvency II matching adjustment portfolios. It is relevant to life insurance and reinsurance companies holding or intending to hold unrated assets (including restructured equity release mortgages (ERMs)) in a matching adjustment portfolio. In CP23/19, PRA had proposed the expectations from firms in respect of their modeling of income-producing real estate loans within their Solvency II internal models. PRA also proposed amendments to its expectations in respect of the use of internal credit assessments for assigning fundamental spreads for illiquid, unrated assets. PRA is mindful that the underlying risks and modeling challenges for income-producing real estate loans are generally similar for both insurers and banks holding such assets. Therefore, PRA has attempted to set consistent expectations between insurers and banks, where appropriate. To this end, PRA has considered the differences in the way the Solvency II regulations apply to insurers and the way models for income-producing real estate loans are supervised under the respective Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) and Directive (CRD IV), which apply to banks.
PRA had received six responses to CP23/19. Respondents generally welcomed the proposals but made a number of observations and requests for clarification. After considering this feedback, PRA decided to maintain the expectations set out in CP23/19, but revised the wording of the SS3/17 to clarify some of these expectations. PRA considers that these changes make the final policy clearer and do not result in any additional requirement on firms compared to the original proposals. As a result, PRA did not update the cost-benefit analysis or assessment of the impact on mutuals from CP23/19. Some minor typographical and formatting corrections have also been made and the name of SS3/17 was changed to "Solvency II: Illiquid unrated assets," in line with the proposals in CP23/19.
The policy set out in PS9/20 has been designed in the context of the withdrawal of UK from EU and its entry into the transition period, during which time the UK remains subject to European law. PRA will keep the policy under review to assess whether any changes would be required due to changes in the UK regulatory framework at the end of the transition period, including those arising once any new arrangements with EU take effect. PRA has assessed that the policy would not need to be amended under the EU (Withdrawal) Act 2018 or EUWA.
Effective Date: April 02, 2020
Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, Insurance, Solvency II, PS9/20, CP23/19, SS3/17, Real Estate Loans, CRD IV, Internal Models, Matching Adjustment, PRA
Leading economist; commercial real estate; performance forecasting, econometric infrastructure; data modeling; credit risk modeling; portfolio assessment; custom commercial real estate analysis; thought leader.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) found that Heritage Bank Limited had incorrectly reported capital because of weaknesses in operational risk and compliance frameworks, although the bank did not breach minimum prudential capital ratios at any point and remains well-capitalized.
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) released the annual report for 2020-2021.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published, along with a summary of its response to the consultation feedback, an information paper that summarizes the finalized capital framework that is in line with the internationally agreed Basel III requirements for banks.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) issued a consultative report focusing on access to central counterparty (CCP) clearing and client-position portability.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) released the final Prudential Practice Guide on management of climate change financial risks (CPG 229) for banks, insurers, and superannuation trustees.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) Single Rulebook Question and Answer (Q&A) tool updates for this month include answers to 10 questions.
The European Commission, or EC, finalized the Implementing Regulation 2021/2017 with respect to the benchmark portfolios, reporting templates, and reporting instructions for the supervisory benchmarking of internal approaches for calculating own funds requirements.
The European Commission (EC) has adopted a package of measures related to the Capital Markets Union.
The European Council adopted its position on two proposals that are part of the digital finance package adopted by the European Commission in September 2020, with one of the proposals involving the regulation on markets in crypto-assets (MiCA) and the other involving the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA).
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) is proposing, via the consultation paper CP21/21, to apply group provisions in the Operational Resilience Part of the PRA Rulebook (relevant for the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR firms) to holding companies.