The Technical Expert Group on Sustainable Finance (TEG), a stakeholder group designed to assist EC in developing elements of green finance policy, issued its final report on climate benchmarks and benchmarks' environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosures. The report recommends a list of minimum technical requirements for the methodologies of "EU Climate Transition" and "EU Paris-aligned" benchmarks, with the objective to address the risk of greenwashing. The report also recommends a set of ESG disclosure requirements, including the standard format to be used for reporting. The report will serve as a basis to the drafting of delegated acts by EC, under the empowerments in the amending climate benchmarks regulation. The draft delegated acts will be subject to a formal public consultation and are expected to be adopted in early 2020.
The TEG report details technical advice on minimum disclosure requirements to improve transparency and comparability of information across benchmarks not only for climate-related information but also on a variety of ESG indicators. These indicators are assessed by benchmark administrators either in-house or through third-party data providers and rating agencies. To ensure global alignment, references are made to the global standards and international conventions used by investors across jurisdictions for their ESG analysis. Furthermore, the perspective of various asset classes has been taken into consideration to ensure that minimum standards are available for as many asset classes as applicable and geared to the associated investment needs. The report also provides detailed technical guidance on minimum technical standards recommended by TEG for the EU Climate Transition Benchmarks and EU Paris-aligned Benchmarks.
Finally, the report details additional context and recommendations for areas of future work as this topic further develops and matures. The areas for further work include the following:
- Alignment between benchmark disclosures and the regulation on sustainability-related disclosures in the financial services sector
- Alignment with the proposed EU Classification System of Sustainable Activities (EU Taxonomy)
- Integration of ESG considerations into investment advice under Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID) II and Insurance Distribution Directive, or IDD (suitability test)
- Technical advice by ESMA on fiduciary duty to EC
- Integration of the sustainable development goals
- Overcoming challenges with the Scope 2 and Scope 3 definition of Green House Gases (GHG) emissions
While conceptually, the two types of climate benchmarks are closely linked to the objectives of the Paris Agreement, the TEG wants to clearly acknowledge that the current state of methodologies and available issuer-level data does not allow for an evident and irrefutable conversion of climate scenarios into detailed and informed portfolio construction methodologies at the time of writing the report. To ensure the highest level of ambition for climate benchmarks, the TEG, therefore, largely relies on available proxies and currently evolving methodologies, sometimes already used by market participants. In this context, the TEG also strongly recommends a review of all minimum standards after a three-year period to ensure the highest level of ambition for climate benchmarks in accordance with the potential enhancements in the state of the research and practices around the scenario analysis applied to investment strategies.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Insurance, Securities, Sustainable Finance, TEG, Climate Benchmarks, Reporting, Action Plan, Disclosures, ESG, EC
Previous ArticleOCC Updates Booklets of the Comptroller’s Handbook
EBA published a report analyzing the impact of the unwind mechanism of the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) for a sample of European banks over a three-year period, from the end of 2016 to the first quarter of 2020.
In response to questions from a member of the European Parliament, the ECB President Christine Lagarde issued a letter clarifying the possibility of amending the AnaCredit Regulation and making targeted longer-term refinancing operations (TLTROs) dependent on the climate-related impact of bank loans.
IASB started the post-implementation review of the classification and measurement requirements in IFRS 9 on financial instruments and added the review as a project to its work plan.
FSB published a report that examines progress in implementing policy measures to enhance the resolvability of systemically important financial institutions.
EBA published a report on the benchmarking of national loan enforcement frameworks across 27 EU member states, in response to the call for advice from EC.
FSB published a letter from its Chair Randal K. Quarles, along with two reports exploring various aspects of the market turmoil resulting from the COVID-19 event.
RBNZ launched a consultation on the details for implementing the final Capital Review decisions announced in December 2019.
The Trustees of the IFRS Foundation, which are responsible for the governance and oversight of IASB, have announced the appointment of Dr. Andreas Barckow as the IASB Chair, effective July 2021.
HKMA issued a letter to consult the banking industry on a full set of proposed draft amendments to the Banking (Capital) Rules for implementing the Basel standard on capital requirements for banks’ equity investments in funds in Hong Kong.
ESRB published an opinion assessing the decision of Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority (FSA) to extend the application period of a stricter measure for residential mortgage lending, in accordance with Article 458 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).