The Central Bank of the UAE (CBUAE) held a meeting that focused on plans for the gradual withdrawal of the extraordinary support measures that were introduced due to the COVID-19 pandemic. This includes the gradual and well-calibrated withdrawal of the Targeted Economic Support Scheme (TESS), the loan deferral component of which is set to expire by the end of 2021. However, the zero cost lending facility may be used to grant new loans until mid-2022. In the short term, CBUAE will leave unchanged the temporarily lowered reserve requirements for banks and the level of the loan-to-value ratio applicable to mortgage loans for first-time home-buyers. Also, the relief measures that allowed banks to maintain lower capital and liquidity buffers are sent to expire by the end of 2021. In a separate release, CBUAE published guidance on transaction monitoring and sanctions screening for the licensed financial institutions, along with a report on typologies in the financial sector.
The typology report, produced by the Supervisory Authorities Sub-Committee, aims to identify and raise awareness of the emerging risks in the financial sector and to enable the concerned supervisory authorities and financial institutions to remain vigilant and address these risks in a timely manner. A pilot group of financial institutions was selected to identify the unique risks prevalent in the sector and exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. The typologies identified in the report include the risk of money laundering and terrorist financing, fraud, bribery, corruption, charity and disaster fraud, cyber-attacks, and external fraud caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The report observed that the risks derived from the typologies identified are additional to the risks of crimes related to money laundering and terrorist financing which outlined in the UAE’s National Risk Assessment and are likely to be prevalent across the wider financial sector. Among those risks are an increase in the use of unlicensed money service providers and a heightened risk of cyber-attacks. The report reveals effective methods of mitigation, identification, and resolution implemented by financial institutions, as well as trend analysis of risks observed.
The guidance on transaction monitoring and sanctions screening aims to promote the understanding and effective implementation by licensed financial institutions of their statutory anti-money laundering and combatting the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) obligations. The guidance came into effect on September 13, 2021 and requires licensed financial institutions to demonstrate compliance with the requirements within one month from the said date. As stipulated in the guidance, licensed financial institutions should establish and maintain effective transaction monitoring and sanction screening programs consisting of a well-calibrated risk-based framework, training and awareness of their employees and active oversight by their board. In addition, licensed financial institutions should ensure the ongoing enhancement of their transaction monitoring and sanctions screening systems based on their risks. The systems, including the related monitoring and screening models used should be subject to independent testing, validation, and auditing.
- Press Release on Relief Measures (PDF)
- Press Release on Typology Report (PDF)
- Report on Typology (PDF)
- Press Release on Guidance (PDF)
- Guidance on AML/CFT (PDF)
Keywords: Middle East and Africa, Banking, COVID-19, TESS, Credit Risk, Regulatory Capital, LTV, AML/CFT, Cyber Risk, Lending, Fraud Detection, CBUAE
Leading economist; commercial real estate; performance forecasting, econometric infrastructure; data modeling; credit risk modeling; portfolio assessment; custom commercial real estate analysis; thought leader.
Previous ArticleFSB Publishes Framework for Information from FMI Intermediaries
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the final policy statement PS21/21 on the leverage ratio framework in the UK. PS21/21, which sets out the final policy of both the Financial Policy Committee (FPC) and PRA
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) proposed to amend Regulation B to implement changes to the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) under Section 1071 of the Dodd-Frank Act.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) decided to maintain, at the 2019 levels, the buffer rates for the Other Systemically Important Institutions (O-SII) for another year, with no new rates to be set until December 2023.
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a progress report on implementation of its high-level recommendations for the regulation, supervision, and oversight of global stablecoin arrangements.
In a letter to the authorized deposit taking institutions, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) announced an increase in the minimum interest rate buffer it expects banks to use when assessing the serviceability of home loan applications.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) are consulting on the preliminary guidance that clarifies that stablecoin arrangements should observe international standards for payment, clearing, and settlement systems.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) have set out their respective work priorities for 2022.
The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) updated the guidelines on supervisory reporting requirements under the reporting framework 3.0, in addition to the reporting module on leverage under the common reporting (COREP) framework.
The European Commission (EC) published the Implementing Decision 2021/1753 on the equivalence of supervisory and regulatory requirements of certain third countries and territories for the purposes of the treatment of exposures, in accordance with the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR (575/2013).
EC published the Implementing Regulation 2021/1751, which lays down implementing technical standards on uniform formats and templates for notification of determination of the impracticability of including contractual recognition of write-down and conversion powers.