Featured Product

    Agustín Carstens of BIS Examines Global and EU Financial Integration

    September 12, 2019

    While speaking at the Eurofi Financial Forum, the BIS General Manager Agustín Carstens examined the status of financial integration at the global and EU levels. He highlighted that regulatory divergences are often mentioned as a major source of fragmentation and examined the policy characteristics that lead to such divergences. Mr. Carstens discussed cross-country cooperation as a desirable development to enable regulation to achieve a better return by promoting more financial integration. "In the future, what now looks desirable may become essential," he added.

    Adapting financial regulation to national specificities may help strengthen domestic financial systems, thus enhancing global financial stability. A case in point is the ring-fencing measures of internationally active firms. For instance, the TLAC standard aims to appropriately distribute loss-absorbing and recapitalization capacity within a group and provide for pre-positioning in material subsidiaries or subgroups. It has recently been proposed that consideration be given to replacing pre-positioning requirements with cross-border guarantees, under which parent companies commit to support subsidiaries in case of need, both in normal times and in resolution. That would, of course, weaken the rationale for ring-fencing and allow international groups to centrally manage a larger amount of resources, thereby supporting their efficiency and promoting market integration. However, work remains to be done to determine whether and how those guarantees could offer sufficient comfort to host authorities and, more broadly, to financial markets.

    Moreover, enhanced information exchange among authorities and better functioning of supervisory colleges and crisis management groups could reduce the need for extraterritorial and other unilateral actions to ensure financial stability and market integrity in all jurisdictions. Recent reports on market fragmentation by FSB and IOSCO have spelled out those ideas, together with a concrete action plan. Even in the sensitive area of ring-fencing, international cooperation may facilitate a better outcome. A fully cooperative solution that would remove any need for ring-fencing is not achievable. However, progress could undoubtedly be made within crisis management groups toward deciding on an allocation of resources within international groups that would strike a good balance between the need to protect stability in each host jurisdiction and the need to preserve sufficient flexibility for the management of the group as a whole.

    Mr. Carstens highlighted that within the European banking union, the existence of single supervisory and resolution authorities provides for consistent policy approaches for both crisis prevention and crisis management. Yet it seems that regulatory harmonization and the creation of the banking union have not yet delivered substantive results in terms of banking integration. One explanation for this could be the insufficient incentives for banking integration. Authorities within the euro area can still impose specific capital, loss absorption, and liquidity requirements on subsidiaries of pan-European firms beyond the obligations imposed at the group consolidated level. Ring-fencing of local subsidiaries could be seen as fundamentally inconsistent with a fully functioning banking union. Though it could also be a natural consequence of the still limited degree of financial integration within the euro area and the insufficiency of the existing risk-sharing mechanisms.

    Logically, progress in deepening the economic and monetary union and completing the banking union would strengthen the case for a full transfer of financial stability responsibilities to EU authorities. The availability of a common deposit guarantee scheme would provide arguments for reducing the current ring-fencing possibilities for the local subsidiaries of pan-European groups. In the European banking union, achieving such integration and removing ring-fencing is even more relevant than at the global level and it also looks more feasible. For instance, together with local authorities, both ECB and SRB are already involved in defining the requirements for banks' liquidity, capital, and loss-absorbing capacity at both the consolidated and the subsidiary level. That could reduce the need to pre-position large amounts of resources with the subsidiaries and help to achieve a balanced allocation of resources within pan-European groups, which would mitigate the potential impact of ring-fencing practices on the integration of the European banking industry. Regardless, he concluded that close international cooperation will become an essential element of any regulatory framework aiming to protect the integrity and stability of the financial system.

     

    Related Link: Speech

     

    Keywords: International, Europe, Banking, Financial Integration, Financial Stability, Market Fragmentation, Financial Stability, Ring Fencing, TLAC, Crisis Management, Banking Union, BIS, EU

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    BCBS Finalizes Revisions to Credit Valuation Adjustment Risk Framework

    BCBS Finalizes Revisions to Credit Valuation Adjustment Risk Framework

    July 08, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Statement on Application of Matching Adjustment Amid Crisis

    PRA published a statement to insurers that clarifies the approach to application of the matching adjustment during COVID-19 crisis.

    July 07, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Provides Clarity on Implementation of Certain COVID-19 Policies

    EBA published a report on the implementation of selected COVID-19 policies within the prudential framework for banking sector.

    July 07, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EC Consults on Revision of Network and Information Systems Directive

    EC launched a consultation to revise the network and information systems (NIS) Directive (2016/1148), which was adopted in July 2016 and is the first horizontal internal market instrument aimed at improving the resilience of the EU against cybersecurity risks.

    July 07, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Statement on LIBOR Transition and PRA Resolution-Related Rules

    PRA published a statement that outlines its view on the implications of LIBOR transition for contracts in scope of the “Contractual Recognition of Bail-In” and “Stay in Resolution” parts of the PRA Rulebook.

    July 07, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Issues Updates to Pillar 2A Capital Framework in UK

    PRA published the policy statement PS15/20 to reflect additional resilience associated with higher macro-prudential buffers in a standard risk environment with a reduction in Pillar 2A capital requirements.

    July 06, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BCBS Report Examines Progress on Adoption of Basel III Framework

    BCBS published the eighteenth progress report on implementation of the Basel III regulatory framework in member jurisdictions.

    July 06, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FCA Proposes Guidance to Further Support Consumer Credit Customers

    FCA announced proposals that would provide continued support for certain consumer credit products to users, who are facing a financial impact because of the exceptional circumstances arising from the COVID-19 pandemic.

    July 03, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ACPR Publishes Draft of Taxonomy RAN 1.4.0 for Solvency II Reporting

    ACPR published a draft version of taxonomy RAN 1.4.0_PWD1, along with the related documentation, for Solvency II reporting.

    July 03, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BCBS Amends Guidelines on Sound Management of AML/CFT Risks

    BCBS amended the guidelines on sound management of risks related to money laundering and financing of terrorism (ML/FT).

    July 02, 2020 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 5445