EBA published report on the functioning of resolution colleges in 2019. The report sets out observations of EBA on the efficiency, effectiveness, and consistency of the functioning of resolution colleges during the year and the progress achieved in key areas of resolution planning. The report outlines key areas to be monitored in 2020, which primarily involve response to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Overall, the report shows that resolution colleges continue to be an active forum for resolution authorities in the development of resolution plans for cross-border banking groups, where the intensity and quality of cooperation and dialog have also improved.
The report reflects the views of EBA on the deliverables expected from resolution authorities in the 2019 cycle; these deliverables are with respect to resolution strategy, resolvability assessment, and minimum requirement of eligible liabilities and own funds (MREL). It states that the joint decision making process generally functioned well, with decisions being taken within the prescribed timelines in 2019. The focus of most colleges has been on operationalization of the preferred resolution strategy. Going forward, the areas that require attention include operationalization of the bail-in tool, determining and planning for liquidity and funding in resolution, operational continuity arrangements, maintenance of access to financial market infrastructures, and introduction of management information capabilities to support resolution. Additionally, ensuring that bail‐in of instruments can be swiftly and efficiently executed will be essential to stabilizing groups experiencing extreme stress.
The wide‐ranging effect of the COVID‐19 crisis has the potential to diminish the financial strength of EU banks. Against this heightened risk, the role of resolution colleges in planning for execution has grown even more important. The current college cycle provides an important opportunity to test the arrangements made to‐date and to move from scenario analysis to more focused planning, based on the situation that exists. Against this background, for the 2020 cycle, EBA intends to monitor college discussion and engagement on the following aspects:
- Credibility and feasibility of preferred resolution strategy in the current environment and the analysis of alternative resolution strategies. For instance, bail‐in strategies for banks materially impacted by the crisis, with a significant MREL shortfall and an inability to issue in the foreseeable future, would need to be reviewed and alternative strategies considered. Similarly, the global or systemic reach of the pandemic may warrant consideration of the effectiveness of current plans to understand the impact of concurrent resolution events occurring.
- The extent to which supervisory authorities, finance ministries, and administrators of deposit guarantee schemes are actively involved in consideration of their respective roles. For resolution to be successful, all members of the college should engage actively and outline the approach they would expect to take within their own particular spheres of competence.
- Analysis of Written Arrangements underpinning colleges and changes arising from revised working arrangements emanating from the pandemic, including updating contact arrangements. It is considered that each college should confirm that all essential elements including back‐up plans in the event of problems, are in place. A test to ensure that all college members are contactable within reasonable timelines is proposed.
- The extent to which colleges undertake reviews of “Business Reorganization Plans.” The aim is to assess if changes are required in response to the economic effects of COVID‐19. Colleges should debate, in conjunction with supervisory authority members, if the broad outline of the plans remain relevant or if work needs to commence to alter such plans.
- Completing a resolvability assessment template. All colleges will be requested to complete a resolvability assessment template to aid in the monitoring of overall progress of key aspects of the planning process.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, COVID-19, Resolution Framework, MREL, Resolution Planning, Resolution Colleges, Bail-In, EBA
Leading economist; commercial real estate; performance forecasting, econometric infrastructure; data modeling; credit risk modeling; portfolio assessment; custom commercial real estate analysis; thought leader.
Previous ArticleSARB Consults on Deposit Insurance Funding Model for South Africa
PRA published the policy statement PS8/21, which contains the final supervisory statement SS3/21 on the PRA approach to supervision of the new and growing non-systemic banks in UK.
EBA published a report that sets out the final draft regulatory technical standards specifying the conditions according to which consolidation shall be carried out in line with Article 18 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
EBA updated the list of other systemically important institutions (O-SIIs) in EU.
BCBS published two reports that discuss transmission channels of climate-related risks to the banking system and the measurement methodologies of climate-related financial risks.
UK Authorities (FCA and PRA) welcomed the findings of FSB peer review on the implementation of financial sector remuneration reforms in the UK.
PRA and FCA jointly issued a letter that highlights risks associated with the increasing volumes of deposits that are placed with banks and building societies via deposit aggregators and how to mitigate these risks.
MFSA announced that amendments to the Banking Act, Subsidiary Legislation, and Banking Rules will be issued in the coming months, to transpose the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5) into the national regulatory framework.
EC finalized the Delegated Regulation 2021/598 that supplements the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR or 575/2013) and lays out the regulatory technical standards for assigning risk-weights to specialized lending exposures.
OSFI launched a consultation to explore ways to enhance the OSFI assurance over capital, leverage, and liquidity returns for banks and insurers, given the increasing complexity arising from the evolving regulatory reporting framework due to IFRS 17 (Insurance Contracts) standard and Basel III reforms.
ECB published results of the benchmarking analysis of the recovery plan cycle for 2019.