US Agencies (FED, FDIC, and OCC) jointly proposed to update the standard on how firms measure counterparty credit risk posed by derivative contracts under the regulatory capital rules. The proposal would provide the standardized approach for measuring counterparty credit risk (SA-CCR) as an alternative approach to the agencies' current exposure methodology (CEM), for calculating derivative exposure under the agencies' regulatory capital rules. Comments will be accepted for 60 days after publication in the Federal Register.
The "advanced approaches" banking organizations—firms that have USD 250 billion or more in total consolidated assets or USD 10 billion or more in on-balance sheet foreign exposure—would be required to begin using SA-CCR by July 01, 2020. The proposal would modify other aspects of the capital rule to account for the proposed implementation of SA-CCR. It would require an advanced approaches banking organization to use SA-CCR with some adjustments to determine the exposure amount of derivative contracts for calculating total leverage exposure (the denominator of the supplementary leverage ratio). The proposal would also incorporate SA-CCR into the cleared transactions framework and would make other amendments, generally with respect to cleared transactions. The proposed introduction of SA-CCR would indirectly affect the FED's single counterparty credit limit rule, along with other rules. OCC is also proposing to update cross-references to CEM and add SA-CCR as an option for determining exposure amounts for derivative contracts in its lending limit rules.
However, non-advanced approaches banking organizations would be allowed to use either CEM or SA-CCR to determine the exposure amount for derivative contracts. SA-CCR better reflects the current derivatives market and would provide important improvements to risk sensitivity, resulting in more appropriate capital requirements for derivative contracts exposure. The proposed changes are designed to better reflect the current derivatives market and incorporate risks observed during the 2007-2008 financial crisis.
Comment Due Date: FR + 60 Days
Keywords: Americas, US, Banking, Basel III, SA-CCR, Advanced Approaches, Derivatives, Regulatory Capital, US Agencies
Previous ArticleEBA Single Rulebook Q&A: Second Update for August 2018
EBA issued a revised list of validation rules with respect to the implementing technical standards on supervisory reporting.
EBA published its response to the call for advice of EC on ways to strengthen the EU legal framework on anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT).
NGFS published a paper on the overview of environmental risk analysis by financial institutions and an occasional paper on the case studies on environmental risk analysis methodologies.
MAS published the guidelines on individual accountability and conduct at financial institutions.
APRA published final versions of the prudential standard APS 220 on credit quality and the reporting standard ARS 923.2 on repayment deferrals.
SRB published two articles, with one article discussing the framework in place to safeguard financial stability amid crisis and the other article outlining the path to a harmonized and predictable liquidation regime.
FSB hosted a virtual workshop as part of the consultation process for its evaluation of the too-big-to-fail reforms.
ECB updated the list of supervised entities in EU, with the number of significant supervised entities being 115.
OSFI published the key findings of a study on third-party risk management.
FSB is extending the implementation timeline, by one year, for the minimum haircut standards for non-centrally cleared securities financing transactions or SFTs.