HKMA announced that the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) ratio for banks in Hong Kong remains unchanged at 1.0%. While making this decision, HKMA considered a series of quantitative indicators and qualitative information, including an “indicative buffer guide.” The latest indicative buffer guide, which has been calculated based on data from the second quarter of 2020, signals a CCyB of 2.5%. However, the projection based on all available data suggests that the indicative buffer guide would very likely signal a lower CCyB than this when all relevant data from the third quarter of 2020 will be available. Mr. Eddie Yue of HKMA stated that it is appropriate to keep the CCyB ratio unchanged at this time, as the economic environment in Hong Kong is still uncertain.
In Hong Kong, the CCyB ratio is usually reviewed on a quarterly basis. CCyB is an integral part of the Basel III regulatory capital framework and is being implemented in parallel by Basel Committee member jurisdictions worldwide. The power to implement the CCyB in Hong Kong is provided by the Banking (Capital) Rules, which enable HKMA to announce a CCyB ratio for Hong Kong. The specific CCyB requirement applicable to a given authorized institution is expressed as a percentage of its common equity tier 1 capital to its total risk-weighted assets. The CCyB requirement of each authorized institution may vary, depending on the geographic mix of its private-sector credit exposures and the CCyB applicable in each jurisdiction where it has such exposures.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Hong Kong, Banking, CCyB, Basel, Regulatory Capital, Macro-Prudential Policy, BCR, HKMA
Previous ArticleFSI Brief Examines COVID-Related Adjustments to Bank Stress Testing
The Bank of England (BoE) published a consultation paper on approach to setting minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL), an operational guide on executing bail-in, and a statement from the Deputy Governor Dave Ramsden.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) is seeking preliminary input on standardization of the proportionality assessment methodology for credit institutions and investment firms.
Certain regulatory authorities in the US are extending period for completion of the review of certain residential mortgage provisions and for publication of notice disclosing the determination of this review until December 20, 2021.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the policy statement PS18/21, which introduces an amendment in the definition of "higher paid material risk taker" in the Remuneration Part of the PRA Rulebook.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published its annual report on asset encumbrance in banking sector.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published a methodological guide to mystery shopping.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) released a letter to authorized deposit-taking institutions to provide an update on key policy settings for the capital framework reforms, which will come into effect from January 01, 2023.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) published a report that assesses the business continuity planning activities of financial market infrastructures or FMIs.
The Bank of England (BoE) published questions and answers (Q&A) on OSCA to BEEDS migration for statistical reporting as well a presentation from the project overview session held with statistical reporters.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) is consulting on a technical amendment to the Basel Framework to reflect a new process reviewing the global systemically important bank (G-SIB) assessment methodology.