The Financial Services Agency of Japan (JFSA) proposed amendments to the regulatory notice for leverage ratio requirements under the Basel framework, with the comment period on the proposals ending on November 29, 2021. JFSA also published the finalized regulatory notice to set out certain rules—based on Article 2, Paragraph (1) and (2) of the "Cabinet Office Order on Restrictions on Over-the-Counter-Derivatives Transactions"—in response to the cessation of LIBOR. The regulatory notice mainly sets out rules for the obligation of centralized clearing as well as rules for transactions subject to electronic trading platform regulations. The regulatory notice will take effect on December 06, 2021.
In addition, JFSA finalized amendments to the "comprehensive guidelines for supervision of major banks, etc." pertaining to the enforcement of the "Act partially amending the Banking Act, etc." Also published was the feedback received on the draft guidelines that were in public consultation from August 27, 2021 to September 27, 2021. The amendments came into effect on November 22, 2021. In another notification, JFSA and Bank of Japan (BOJ) published key results of a survey on the use of JPY LIBOR. To understand the state of the transition away from JPY LIBOR at Japanese financial institutions, JFSA and BOJ asked large financial institutions about their estimates regarding the number of contracts referencing JPY LIBOR and incorporation of fallback provisions at domestic branches on a non-consolidated basis. JFSA and BOJ also asked financial institutions about their challenges and policies for the transition with regard to legacy contracts as of end-September 2021. Yet another development involved the publication of the finalized principles for model risk management by JFSA; these principles include the following:
- Governance. The board of directors and senior management should establish a framework of comprehensive model risk management.
- Model Identification, model inventory, and model risk rating. Firms should identify models, record them in a model inventory, and assign a risk rating to each of the models.
- Model development. Firms should have in place a sound model development process. Firms should adequately develop model documents and carry out model testing.
- Model approval. Firms should have a robust process of model approval at various stages of a model lifecycle, for example, at the inception, material changes, and revalidation of a model.
- Ongoing monitoring. After a model goes into use, the model should undergo ongoing monitoring by the first line of defense to confirm that the model is performing as intended.
- Model validation. As an integral element of review and challenge by the second line of defense, models should be subject to independent validation. This includes initial validation prior to use, validation of material model changes, and revalidation after a model goes into use.
- Vendor products and use of external resources. Where firms use vendor products or external resources, the firms should have adequate controls in place over the use of those products and external resources.
- Internal audit. As the third line of defense, internal audit functions should assess the overall effectiveness of the model risk management framework.
Comment Due Date: November 29, 2021 (Leverage Ratio)
Effective Date: December 06, 2021 (LIBOR)/November 22, 2021 (Guidelines for Major Banks)
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Japan, Banking, Securities, Basel, Leverage Ratio, LIBOR, OTC Derivatives, Regulatory Capital, Guidance, Banking Act, LIBOR Transition, Model Risk Management, Benchmark Reforms, BOJ, JFSA
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2022/25, which supplements the Investment Firms Regulation (IFR or Regulation 2019/2033) with respect to the regulatory technical standards specifying the methods for measuring the K-factors referred to in Article 15 of the IFR.
The Bank of International Settlements (BIS) published a paper that assesses the ways in which platform-based business models can affect financial inclusion, competition, financial stability and consumer protection.
The European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) published the list of identified financial conglomerates for 2021.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) granted license to Barclays Bank PLC and Crédit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank to operate as foreign authorized deposit-taking institutions under the Banking Act 1959.
EU published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a corrigendum to the Delegated Regulation 2015/35, which supplements Solvency II Directive (2009/138/EC).
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published an Opinion on the scale and impact of de-risking in European Union and the steps that competent authorities should take to tackle unwarranted de-risking.
The French Financial Markets Authority (AMF) published its 2022 work priorities, along with the supervisory priorities for 2022.
The U.S. Department of the Treasury issued a determination on a request for an exemption, by RBC US Group Holdings LLC, from certain requirements of the rule implementing the qualified financial contracts (QFC) recordkeeping requirements under the Dodd-Frank Act.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) announced that publication of 24 LIBOR settings has ended and that, going forward, the 6 most widely used sterling and Japanese yen settings will be published using a changed methodology.
The People’s Bank of China (PBC) formulated the recently issued Fintech Development Plan (2022 to 2025) under the Outline of the 14th Five-Year Plan (2021-2025) for National Economic and Social Development and the Long-Range Objectives through the Year 2035.