APRA published a set of frequently asked questions (FAQs) to provide authorized deposit-taking institutions with an up-to-date guidance on supervisory expectations during the period of disruption driven by COVID-19. The FAQs clarify the regulatory capital approach for loan repayment deferrals and the guidance for serviceability assessments in the Prudential Practice Guide APG 223 on residential mortgage lending. The FAQs are expected to be updated periodically over the coming months.
The FAQs set out that the regulatory capital approach of APRA specifies that, over the next six months, banks do not need to treat the period of the repayment deferral as a period of arrears for capital purposes. As per APRA, the regulatory capital approach can be applied to a broad class of otherwise performing loans on which authorized deposit-taking institutions grant repayments deferrals. This includes loans that are less than 90 days past due and not impaired at the time deferral was granted. Authorized deposit-taking institutions should publicly disclose the nature and terms of any repayment deferrals given to a broad class of loans and the volume of loans to which they are applied. These institutions should also closely monitor the portfolio credit risk of this cohort of loans, and are required to report to APRA information on the volume and risk profile of this segment of the portfolio.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Australia, Banking, Residential Mortgage Lending, Credit Risk, COVID-19, FAQ, Regulatory Capital, Loan Moratorium, Basel, APRA
Previous ArticleECB Amends Rule on Reporting of Supervisory Financial Information
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final guidelines on the monitoring of the threshold and other procedural aspects on the establishment of intermediate parent undertakings in European Union (EU), as laid down in the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD).
In a recent Market Notice, the Bank of England (BoE) confirmed that green gilts will have equivalent eligibility to existing gilts in its market operations.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the policy statement PS21/9 on implementation of the Investment Firms Prudential Regime.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) proposed regulatory technical standards that set out criteria for identifying shadow banking entities for the purpose of reporting large exposures.
The Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) proposed a set of recommendations on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings and data providers.
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) published recommendations from the Working Group on Euro Risk-Free Rates (RFR) on the switch to risk-free rates in the interdealer market.
The European Commission (EC) announced plans to defer the application of 13 regulatory technical standards under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (2019/2088) by six months, from January 01, 2022 to July 01, 2022.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) proposed to amend the supervisory statement on supervision of run-off undertakings that are subject to Solvency II regulation.
The Bank of England (BoE) published a consultation paper on approach to setting minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL), an operational guide on executing bail-in, and a statement from the Deputy Governor Dave Ramsden.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) is seeking preliminary input on standardization of the proportionality assessment methodology for credit institutions and investment firms.