SRB communicated its post-Brexit approach to determining the eligibility of UK law instruments without bail-in clauses as minimum requirement for own funds and liabilities (MREL). As per the published communication, SRB will consider liabilities governed by UK law without a contractual bail-in recognition clause as eligible for MREL, if they were issued on or before November 15, 2018. This exemption shall apply until June 28, 2025.
To further elaborate, SRB will consider liabilities governed by UK law without a contractual bail-in recognition clause as eligible for MREL, if they:
- otherwise satisfy the applicable MREL criteria.
- were issued on or before November 15, 2018, when SRB published its resolvability expectations for banks in the context of Brexit and noted the potential consequences of Brexit for banks’ existing stock of UK law governed MREL instruments. This exemption shall apply until June 28, 2025, to ensure alignment with the prudential grandfathering of the requirement to introduce contractual recognition clauses in own funds instruments provided for in Article 494b of the Capital Requirements Regulation
This approach would ensure a smooth transition and would avoid any disproportionate effects on the banks, while still serving the overarching goal of achieving the resolvability of banks and ensuring that they maintain adequate levels of loss-absorbing liabilities. Any liability governed by the UK law that is issued or materially amended after November 15, 2018 must include a contractual bail-in recognition clause to be eligible for MREL. The volume of the concerned instruments will gradually decrease over time as they reach their respective maturity dates. SRB will continue to monitor the resolvability of banks whose liabilities include such instruments and may review the considerations expressed in this communication if changing circumstances affect the resolvability of those banks.
MREL is the minimum amount of equity and eligible debt a bank must maintain to support an effective resolution. These liabilities need to be susceptible to bail-in in the event of a bank resolution action, to minimize the impact on public funds. Liabilities governed by third-country law must include a contractual bail-in recognition clause. Following the introduction of the Banking Package, third-country liabilities not including such clause are automatically not eligible for MREL. This mandatory condition applies to all liabilities, including additional tier 1 and tier 2 instruments. The EU law ensuring automatic application of SRB resolution actions in all EU member states ceased to apply to the UK on December 31, 2020, following the end of the transition period under the Brexit Withdrawal Agreement. Consequently, liabilities governed by UK law are now subject to the same rules as those governed by other third-country laws.
Keywords: Europe, EU, UK, Banking, MREL, Bail in, CRR, Brexit, Resolution Planning, Basel, Regulatory Capital, Resolution Framework, SRB
APRA issued a letter on the loss-absorbing capacity (LAC) requirements for domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs) and published a discussion paper, along with the proposed the prudential standards on financial contingency planning (CPS 190) and resolution planning (CPS 900).
The European Commission (EC) launched a call for evidence, until March 18, 2022, as part of a comprehensive review of the macro-prudential rules for the banking sector under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) and Directive (CRD IV).
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a report that sets out good practices for crisis management groups.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) found that Heritage Bank Limited had incorrectly reported capital because of weaknesses in operational risk and compliance frameworks, although the bank did not breach minimum prudential capital ratios at any point and remains well-capitalized.
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) released the annual report for 2020-2021.
Through a letter addressed to the banking sector entities, the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) announced deferral of the domestic implementation of the final Basel III reforms from the first to the second quarter of 2023.
EIOPA recently published a letter in which EC is informing the European Parliament and Council that it could not adopt the set of draft regulatory technical standards for disclosures under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) within the stipulated three-month period, given their length and technical detail.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the third in a series of policy statements that set out rules to introduce the UK Investment Firm Prudential Regime (IFPR), which will take effect on January 01, 2022.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published, along with a summary of its response to the consultation feedback, an information paper that summarizes the finalized capital framework that is in line with the internationally agreed Basel III requirements for banks.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) issued a consultative report focusing on access to central counterparty (CCP) clearing and client-position portability.