BOJ and JFSA published a response to the IBA announcement on the end date of LIBOR panel publication and the FCA announcement on the intention to consult on the publication of synthetic JPY LIBOR. In their response, BOJ and JFSA have specified the actions needed toward the end of 2021 when panel-based LIBOR will cease, in addition to setting out their expectations with respect to the synthetic JPY LIBOR.
In principle, either active conversion to alternative reference rates or insertion of fallback language is necessary for legacy contracts referencing LIBOR in preparation for the permanent cessation of LIBOR. On March 05, 2021, IBA notified that panel-based LIBOR will cease at the end of 2021, except for certain USD LIBOR settings. According to the response statement, it is important that each financial institution should proceed to explain to its customers and amend contracts to progress either active conversion or insertion of fallback language as soon as practicable, in conformity with the “Roadmap to prepare for the discontinuation of LIBOR” released by the Cross-Industry Committee on JPY Interest Rate Benchmarks in August 2020 as well as the transition plan of each financial institution.
While FCA has announced that it will consult on using the proposed new powers to require publication of synthetic JPY LIBOR for one additional year after the end of 2021, the Financial Services Bill introduced to the UK Parliament in October 2020 has not yet been enacted. Even if the Bill is enacted, in the UK, as expected, FCA could only compel IBA to publish a synthetic LIBOR for a limited period of time and its use will be restricted to legacy contracts that cannot feasibly be transitioned away from LIBOR. Therefore, it is of utmost importance that preparations toward the transition away from LIBOR continue without reliance on synthetic LIBOR. Continuous efforts are necessary to cease the issuance of new loans and bonds referencing JPY LIBOR by the end of June 2021 and to significantly reduce the amount of loans and bonds referencing JPY LIBOR by the end of September 2021. While it is premature to consider the use of synthetic JPY LIBOR at the moment, the following are the expectations of BOJ and JFSA with respect to the potential publication of synthetic JPY LIBOR:
- Use of synthetic JPY LIBOR in new contracts and transactions. It is of utmost importance to steadily reduce the amount of contracts referencing JPY LIBOR to advance orderly transition away from JPY LIBOR, even if synthetic JPY LIBOR can be a “safety net.” Any synthetic JPY LIBOR should not be used in new contracts and transactions.
- Use of synthetic JPY LIBOR in legacy contracts and transactions. In Japan, synthetic JPY LIBOR should be considered as a potential “safety net” and used only for legacy contracts that cannot feasibly be transitioned away from JPY LIBOR. The Cross-Industry Committee, in close cooperation with a wide range of market participants, intends to discuss the risks and uncertainties with a view to considering the nature of potential tough legacy that cannot be transitioned away from JPY LIBOR before the end of 2021.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Japan, Banking, Securities, LIBOR, Interest Rate Benchmarks, Benchmark Reforms, Basel, LIBOR Transition, Synthetic LIBOR, IBA, FCA, BOJ, JFSA
Previous ArticlePRA and FCA Consult on Bilateral Margin Requirements for Derivatives
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the final policy statement PS21/21 on the leverage ratio framework in the UK. PS21/21, which sets out the final policy of both the Financial Policy Committee (FPC) and PRA
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) proposed to amend Regulation B to implement changes to the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (ECOA) under Section 1071 of the Dodd-Frank Act.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) decided to maintain, at the 2019 levels, the buffer rates for the Other Systemically Important Institutions (O-SII) for another year, with no new rates to be set until December 2023.
The Financial Stability Board (FSB) published a progress report on implementation of its high-level recommendations for the regulation, supervision, and oversight of global stablecoin arrangements.
In a letter to the authorized deposit taking institutions, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) announced an increase in the minimum interest rate buffer it expects banks to use when assessing the serviceability of home loan applications.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) are consulting on the preliminary guidance that clarifies that stablecoin arrangements should observe international standards for payment, clearing, and settlement systems.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) and the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) have set out their respective work priorities for 2022.
The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) updated the guidelines on supervisory reporting requirements under the reporting framework 3.0, in addition to the reporting module on leverage under the common reporting (COREP) framework.
The European Commission (EC) published the Implementing Decision 2021/1753 on the equivalence of supervisory and regulatory requirements of certain third countries and territories for the purposes of the treatment of exposures, in accordance with the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR (575/2013).
EC published the Implementing Regulation 2021/1751, which lays down implementing technical standards on uniform formats and templates for notification of determination of the impracticability of including contractual recognition of write-down and conversion powers.