General Information & Client Service
  • Americas: +1.212.553.1653
  • Asia: +852.3551.3077
  • China: +86.10.6319.6580
  • EMEA: +44.20.7772.5454
  • Japan: +81.3.5408.4100
Media Relations
  • New York: +1.212.553.0376
  • London: +44.20.7772.5456
  • Hong Kong: +852.3758.1350
  • Tokyo: +813.5408.4110
  • Sydney: +61.2.9270.8141
  • Mexico City: +001.888.779.5833
  • Buenos Aires: +0800.666.3506
  • São Paulo: +0800.891.2518
March 02, 2018

Andreas Dombret of Bundesbank spoke—at the second Regional Banking Conference of the State of Hesse in Brussels—about the prospects for, and obstacles to, greater proportionality in banking regulation. He examined regulatory proportionality from the perspective of a supervisor and outlined what greater proportionality in the EU might look like.

Dr. Dombret discussed the need for greater proportionality in the context of Basel III reforms, which have made regulatory implementation of increasingly complex rules harder for smaller and medium-size institutions. He outlined three principles that need to govern treatment of this issue: financial stability must remain the primary concern, all relief measures must conform to the principle of equal treatment, and treatment should target the day-to-day burden for institutions with low-risk business models (easing of solvency or liquidity rules is out of the question). Within this outlined framework, new treatments are providing considerable scope for banking regulation that is more proportionate for, and thus more reconcilable with, smaller and less complex institutions. He discussed the work of EC and European Parliament in this area, also mentioning that the proposals for eased requirements in the areas of disclosure and reporting are "highly extensive" and a "very welcome development." He also added that he regrets that a general approach—such as the small banking box—was rejected. 

He outlined two potential ways of improving proportionality either by taking a small-scale approach and introducing simplifications and exceptions for individual rules or by creating a whole new framework tailored to small banks and low-risk institutions. The second solution would be further-reaching and clear cut. However, the majority in Europe seems to "favor the small-scale solution." The emphasis must be on "reducing the administrative workload and minimizing the red tape," said Dr. Dombret. To this end, the measures being reviewed include exceptions to disclosure requirements, reductions in the granularity of reporting requirements, and a simplified form of the net stable funding ratio. However, he emphasized the importance of fully implementing the recently finalized Basel III package in the EU and added that, "no concessions can be made, in particular, when it comes to the risk-weighted capital ratio, the leverage ratio, or the short-term liquidity coverage ratio." However, full implementation of Basel III rules does not mean that all banks need to be affected by these highly complex rules to the same extent. Member countries of the Basel Committee are free to apply other rules to smaller banks that are only active in their own home markets and do not pose a threat to international financial stability. This is the framework that should be largely used when revising the EU rules.

In terms of the review of the trading book, Bundesbank favors retaining the simple, standardized approaches currently in place for small institutions with small trading books. Dr. Dombret states that the new, complex standardized approach is good for institutions that engage in substantial trading activity but it is not suited to locally based savings banks or people's banks. He added that Bundesbank supports the idea of EC and the European Parliament to exclude development banks from the scope of the CRD/CRR regulatory framework. "Given, above all, the particularities of the business models of German development banks and their public mandate, I fail to see why these institutions should be subject to complex international regulation.... We are also calling for institutions with total assets in excess of USD 30 billion to be covered by an exemption." He concludes that when implementing the Basel III reforms in the EU, the rules must be applied in full to internationally active banks. However, in case of smaller banks that are not internationally active, the focus should be on reducing the operational burden by scaling back or removing inappropriately complex rules on checking whether it would be possible to exempt entire groups of institutions such as development banks from the European regulation. It is now up to the European Parliament, the EU Council of Ministers, and EC to pave the way for substantial improvements.


Related Link: Speech

Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Proportionality, Basel III, Financial Stability, Bundesbank, BCBS

Related Insights
News

BCBS Finds Liquidity Risk Management Principles Remain Fit for Purpose

BCBS completed a review of its 2008 Principles for sound liquidity risk management and supervision. The review confirmed that the principles remain fit for purpose.

January 17, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

HKMA Urges Local Banks to Start Working on FRTB Implementation

HKMA announced that it plans to issue a consultation paper on the new market risk standard in the second quarter of 2019.

January 17, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

EBA Finalizes Guidelines for High-Risk Exposures Under CRR

EBA published the final guidelines on the specification of types of exposures to be associated with high risk under the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR). The guidelines are intended to facilitate a higher degree of comparability in terms of the current practices in identifying high-risk exposures.

January 17, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

MAS Guidelines on Risk Mitigation Requirements for OTC Derivatives

MAS published guidelines on risk mitigation requirements for non-centrally cleared over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives contracts.

January 17, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

BoE Publishes the Schedule for Statistical Reporting for 2019

BoE published the updated schedule for statistical reporting for 2019. The reporting institutions use the online statistical data application (OSCA) to submit statistical data to BoE.

January 16, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

PRA Delays Final Direction on Reporting of Private Securitizations

PRA and FCA have delayed the issuance of final direction, including the final template, on reporting of private securitizations, from January 15, 2019 to the end of January 2019.

January 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

SNB Updates Forms on Supervisory Reporting for Banks

SNB published Version 1.7 of reporting forms (AUR_U, AUR_UEA, AUR_UES, AURH_U, AUR_K, AUR_KEA, and AURH_K) and the related documentation for supervisory reporting on an individual and consolidated basis.

January 15, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

BCBS Finalizes Market Risk Capital Framework and Work Program for 2019

BCBS published the final framework for market risk capital requirements and its work program for 2019. Also published was an explanatory note to provide a non-technical description of the overall market risk framework, the changes that have been incorporated into in this version of the framework and impact of the framework.

January 14, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: First Update for January 2019

EBA published answers to 13 questions under the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) updates for this week.

January 11, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
News

PRA Proposes to Amend Supervisory Statement on Credit Risk Mitigation

PRA published the consultation paper CP1/19 that is proposing changes to the supervisory statement (SS17/13) on credit risk mitigation.

January 10, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 2473