The Board of the Finnish Financial Supervisory Authority (FIN-FSA) has decided to impose, on credit institutions, a structural additional capital requirement in the form of the systemic risk buffer. The buffer will strengthen the risk absorbency of credit institutions for structural systemic risks. It will be imposed on Nordea at a level of 3.0%, on Op Group at 2.0%, on Municipality Finance Plc at 1.5%, and on other Finnish credit institutions at 1.0%.
For Nordea, OP Group, and Municipality Finance Plc, the systemic risk buffer has been set higher than the others because their contribution to systemic risks is particularly large and their notional impact on the indicators examined as justification for a systemic risk buffer is substantial. Marja Nykänen, Chair of the Board of the FIN-FSA, says that the structural systemic risks are so high in the financial system in Finland that it is justified to impose a systemic risk buffer on all credit institutions. In addition to the systemic risk buffer, the additional capital requirements for global (G-SII/B) and national (O-SII) systemically important credit institutions were reviewed.
The decision was made to identify Nordea as a global systemically important credit institution (G-SII/B) and to impose on Nordea an additional capital requirement of 1.0%. The decision complies with the recommendation of FSB. FIN-FSA has identified the systemically significant credit institution for Finland (O-SIIs) and has imposed on them additional capital requirements as follows: Nordea 2.0%, OP Group 2.0%, and Municipality Finance Plc 0.5%. Of the additional capital requirements imposed, only the highest (in this case the systemic risk buffer) are obligatory. Within the banking union, the level of the tsystemic risk buffer has currently been set at 3% at most, even though a number of credit institutions operating in the banking union are, overall, larger and, from the perspective of the financial stability of the whole banking union, more significant than Nordea.
Keywords: Europe, Finland, Banking, Systemic Risk Buffer, G-SIB, O-SII, ESAs, FIN-FSA
Sam leads the quantitative research team within the CreditEdge™ research group. In this role, he develops novel risk and forecasting solutions for financial institutions while providing thought leadership on related trends in global financial markets.
Previous ArticleMAS Consults on the Revisions to Misconduct Reporting Requirements
EBA published phase 2 of the technical package on the reporting framework 2.10, providing the technical tools and specifications for implementation of EBA reporting requirements.
FASB issued a proposed Accounting Standards Update that would grant insurance companies, adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, an additional year to implement the Accounting Standards Update No. 2018-12 on targeted improvements to accounting for long-duration insurance contracts, or LDTI (Topic 944).
APRA updated the regulatory approach for loans subject to repayment deferrals amid the COVID-19 crisis.
BCBS and FSB published a report on supervisory issues associated with benchmark transition.
IAIS published a report on supervisory issues associated with benchmark transition from an insurance perspective.
ESMA updated the reporting manual on the European Single Electronic Format (ESEF).
EBA published a statement on resolution planning in light of the COVID-19 pandemic.
BCBS Finalizes Revisions to Credit Valuation Adjustment Risk Framework
ECB published a guideline (2020/97), in the Official Journal of European Union, on the definition of materiality threshold for credit obligations past due for less significant institutions.
FED temporarily revised the capital assessments and stress testing reports (FR Y-14A/Q/M) to implement the changes in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.