BCBS, on March 22, 2018, launched a consultation on revisions to the minimum capital requirements for market risk. The consultation period ended on June 20 and BCBS has published the 42 responses it had received to this consultation.
The proposals aim to address issues that BCBS had identified while monitoring the implementation and impact of the market risk standard that was issued in January 2016. Post this, BCBS had launched a consultation, in June 2017, on a simplified alternative to the standardized approach. The June 2017 consultation proposed a re-calibration of the Basel II standardized approach for banks with less material market risk exposure. The most recent consultation proposed the following changes:
- Changes to the measurement of the standardized approach to enhance its risk-sensitivity, including changes to foreign exchange risk
- Re-calibration of standardized approach risk-weights applicable to general interest rate risk, foreign exchange risk, and equity risk
- Revisions to the assessment process to determine whether a bank's internal risk management models appropriately reflect the risks of individual trading desks
- Clarifications on the requirements for identification of risk factors that are eligible for internal modeling
- Clarifications on the scope of exposures that are subject to market risk capital requirements
BCBS plans to finalize any revisions to the market risk standard as soon as possible to allow enough time for national implementation and for banks to develop the necessary infrastructure. The proposed revisions are designed to support smooth implementation of the standard. The implementation date of the market risk standard is January 01, 2022. Improvements to the capital requirements for trading activities are a key component of the Basel Committee's overall efforts to reform global regulatory standards in response to the global financial crisis.
- Comments Received
- Press Release on Consultation
- Consultation Paper (PDF)
- FAQ on Market Risk Requirements
Keywords: International, Banking, Basel III, Market Risk, Capital Requirements, Standardized Approach, Responses to Consultation, BCBS
Previous ArticleFED Proposes to Adopt ISO 20022 Format for Fedwire Funds Service
BCBS Finalizes Revisions to Credit Valuation Adjustment Risk Framework
PRA published a statement to insurers that clarifies the approach to application of the matching adjustment during COVID-19 crisis.
EBA published a report on the implementation of selected COVID-19 policies within the prudential framework for banking sector.
EC launched a consultation to revise the network and information systems (NIS) Directive (2016/1148), which was adopted in July 2016 and is the first horizontal internal market instrument aimed at improving the resilience of the EU against cybersecurity risks.
PRA published a statement that outlines its view on the implications of LIBOR transition for contracts in scope of the “Contractual Recognition of Bail-In” and “Stay in Resolution” parts of the PRA Rulebook.
PRA published the policy statement PS15/20 to reflect additional resilience associated with higher macro-prudential buffers in a standard risk environment with a reduction in Pillar 2A capital requirements.
BCBS published the eighteenth progress report on implementation of the Basel III regulatory framework in member jurisdictions.
FCA announced proposals that would provide continued support for certain consumer credit products to users, who are facing a financial impact because of the exceptional circumstances arising from the COVID-19 pandemic.
ACPR published a draft version of taxonomy RAN 1.4.0_PWD1, along with the related documentation, for Solvency II reporting.
BCBS amended the guidelines on sound management of risks related to money laundering and financing of terrorism (ML/FT).