Her Majesty's Treasury (HMT) published a policy statement proposing the approach to mitigate risks from critical third parties, such as cloud-based service providers, to the UK finance sector. Additionally, HMT and the Japanese Financial Services Agency established a UK-Japan Financial Regulatory Forum.
Policy statement on "Critical" Third-Party Regime
The statement provides details on HM Treasury’s proposal for reducing the risks of systemic disruption to the financial regulators’ objectives, including financial stability and market confidence. Under this proposal, HM Treasury, in consultation with the financial regulators and other bodies, will designate certain third parties that provide services to firms as "critical." The financial regulators will then be able to make rules, gather information, and take enforcement action, in respect of certain services that critical third parties provide to firms of particular relevance to the regulators’ objectives (which the regulators refer to as "material" services). The proposed regime will allow financial regulator to directly oversee services that critical third parties provide to firms. This will enable the regulators to ensure that services critical third parties provide to firms in the finance sector are resilient, thus reducing the risk of systemic disruption. The proposed regime will provide financial regulators with powers to:
- request information directly from critical third parties on the resilience of their material services to firms, or their compliance with applicable requirements.
- commission an independent "skilled person" to report on certain aspects of a critical third party’s services.
- appoint an investigator to look into potential breaches of requirements under the legislation.
- interview a representative of a critical third party and require the production of documents.
- enter a critical third party’s premises under warrant as part of an investigation.
As a next step, the UK government intends to legislate the aforementioned critical third-party regime, to publish a joint discussion paper that details how these powers granted to financial regulators might be exercised, and to seek views from industry on the most effective and proportionate way to do so. The discussion paper will also explore potential specific ways for the financial regulators to coordinate the exercise of their powers with overseas financial regulators, and UK authorities and regulators from outside the financial services sector.
UK-Japan Financial Regulatory Forum. HM Treasury, in collaboration with the Japanese Financial Services Agency, established a UK-Japan Financial Regulatory Forum, setting out provisions for the exchange of information, consultation, deference, technical mediation, and cooperation on diversity in finance, sustainable finance, and other emerging issues. The Forum will support closer cooperation on areas of mutual interest, including public-private partnerships in insurance, sustainable finance, and financial innovation. The UK and Japan also discussed their approaches for supporting international firms to access their markets, cross-border data flows, diversity in financial services, and opportunities in the insurance, asset management and fintech sectors.
- Policy Statement on Third Party Regime
- Press Release on UK-Japan Financial Regulatory Forum
- Letter on UK-Japan Financial Regulatory Forum (PDF)
Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, Third-Party Risk, Cloud Service Providers, Systemic Risk, Sustainable Finance, Insurance, Regtech, UK-Japan Financial Regulatory Forum, Operational Resilience, JFSA, HM Treasury
Across 35 years in banking, Blake has gained deep insights into the inner working of this sector. Over the last two decades, Blake has been an Operating Committee member, leading teams and executing strategies in Credit and Enterprise Risk as well as Line of Business. His focus over this time has been primarily Commercial/Corporate with particular emphasis on CRE. Blake has spent most of his career with large and mid-size banks. Blake joined Moody’s Analytics in 2021 after leading the transformation of the credit approval and reporting process at a $25 billion bank.
Previous ArticleDanish Central Bank Assesses Financial Stability of Banks
Next ArticleOCC Publishes Testimony of Deputy Comptroller on AI
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has published the findings of its latest climate risk self-assessment survey conducted across the banking, insurance, and superannuation industries.
The French Prudential Supervisory Authority (ACPR) published a notice related to the methods for calculating and publishing prudential ratios under the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD IV) and the minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL).
The Financial Stability Institute (FSI) of the Bank for International Settlements recently published a paper proposing a framework for classifying financial stability regulation as either entity-based or activity-based.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pension Authority (EIOPA) published the risk dashboard based on Solvency II data and the final version of the application guidance on climate change materiality assessments and climate change scenarios in the Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA).
The European Banking Authority (EBA) and the European Central Bank (ECB) published their responses to the consultations of the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) and the European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG) on sustainability-related disclosure standards.
A Consultative Group on Risk Management (CGRM) at the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) published a report that examines incorporation of climate risks into the international reserve management framework.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final guidelines on liquidity requirements exemption for investment firms, updated version of its 5.2 filing rules document for supervisory reporting, and Single Rulebook Question and Answer (Q&A) updates in July 2022.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published Version 2.8.0 of the Solvency II data point model (DPM) and XBRL taxonomy.
The European Union published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, an opinion from the European Economic and Social Committee (EESC); the opinion is on the proposal for a regulation to amend the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
HM Treasury published a draft statutory instrument titled “The Financial Services (Miscellaneous Amendments) (EU Exit) Regulations 2022,” along with the related explanatory memorandum and impact assessment.