Her Majesty's Treasury (HMT) published a policy statement proposing the approach to mitigate risks from critical third parties, such as cloud-based service providers, to the UK finance sector. Additionally, HMT and the Japanese Financial Services Agency established a UK-Japan Financial Regulatory Forum.
Policy statement on "Critical" Third-Party Regime
The statement provides details on HM Treasury’s proposal for reducing the risks of systemic disruption to the financial regulators’ objectives, including financial stability and market confidence. Under this proposal, HM Treasury, in consultation with the financial regulators and other bodies, will designate certain third parties that provide services to firms as "critical." The financial regulators will then be able to make rules, gather information, and take enforcement action, in respect of certain services that critical third parties provide to firms of particular relevance to the regulators’ objectives (which the regulators refer to as "material" services). The proposed regime will allow financial regulator to directly oversee services that critical third parties provide to firms. This will enable the regulators to ensure that services critical third parties provide to firms in the finance sector are resilient, thus reducing the risk of systemic disruption. The proposed regime will provide financial regulators with powers to:
- request information directly from critical third parties on the resilience of their material services to firms, or their compliance with applicable requirements.
- commission an independent "skilled person" to report on certain aspects of a critical third party’s services.
- appoint an investigator to look into potential breaches of requirements under the legislation.
- interview a representative of a critical third party and require the production of documents.
- enter a critical third party’s premises under warrant as part of an investigation.
As a next step, the UK government intends to legislate the aforementioned critical third-party regime, to publish a joint discussion paper that details how these powers granted to financial regulators might be exercised, and to seek views from industry on the most effective and proportionate way to do so. The discussion paper will also explore potential specific ways for the financial regulators to coordinate the exercise of their powers with overseas financial regulators, and UK authorities and regulators from outside the financial services sector.
UK-Japan Financial Regulatory Forum. HM Treasury, in collaboration with the Japanese Financial Services Agency, established a UK-Japan Financial Regulatory Forum, setting out provisions for the exchange of information, consultation, deference, technical mediation, and cooperation on diversity in finance, sustainable finance, and other emerging issues. The Forum will support closer cooperation on areas of mutual interest, including public-private partnerships in insurance, sustainable finance, and financial innovation. The UK and Japan also discussed their approaches for supporting international firms to access their markets, cross-border data flows, diversity in financial services, and opportunities in the insurance, asset management and fintech sectors.
- Policy Statement on Third Party Regime
- Press Release on UK-Japan Financial Regulatory Forum
- Letter on UK-Japan Financial Regulatory Forum (PDF)
Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, Third-Party Risk, Cloud Service Providers, Systemic Risk, Sustainable Finance, Insurance, Regtech, UK-Japan Financial Regulatory Forum, Operational Resilience, JFSA, HM Treasury
Across 35 years in banking, Blake has gained deep insights into the inner working of this sector. Over the last two decades, Blake has been an Operating Committee member, leading teams and executing strategies in Credit and Enterprise Risk as well as Line of Business. His focus over this time has been primarily Commercial/Corporate with particular emphasis on CRE. Blake has spent most of his career with large and mid-size banks. Blake joined Moody’s Analytics in 2021 after leading the transformation of the credit approval and reporting process at a $25 billion bank.
Previous ArticleDanish Central Bank Assesses Financial Stability of Banks
Next ArticleOCC Publishes Testimony of Deputy Comptroller on AI
The three European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) issued a letter to inform about delay in the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) mandate, along with a Call for Evidence on greenwashing practices.
The International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) of the IFRS Foundations made several announcements at COP27 and with respect to its work on the sustainability standards.
The International Organization for Securities Commissions (IOSCO), at COP27, outlined the regulatory priorities for sustainability disclosures, mitigation of greenwashing, and promotion of integrity in carbon markets.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) issued a statement in the context of COP27, clarified the operationalization of intermediate EU parent undertakings (IPUs) of third-country groups
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) published an annual report on its activities, a report on forward-looking work.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) finalized amendments to the capital framework, announced a review of the prudential framework for groups.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hubs and several central banks are working together on various central bank digital currency (CBDC) pilots.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published the results of its thematic review, which shows that banks are still far from adequately managing climate and environmental risks.
Among its recent publications, the European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final standards and guidelines on interest rate risk arising from non-trading book activities (IRRBB)
The European Commission (EC) recently adopted regulations with respect to the calculation of own funds requirements for market risk, the prudential treatment of global systemically important institutions (G-SIIs)