ESAs published two amended implementing technical standards on the mapping of credit assessments of External Credit Assessment Institutions (ECAIs). The amendments reflect the recognition of two new credit rating agencies (CRAs), the outcome of a monitoring exercise on the adequacy of existing mappings, and the deregistration of a number of CRAs. The revised draft implementing technical standards have been developed according to the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) and the Solvency II Directive. ESAs also published individual draft mapping reports illustrating how the methodology was applied to produce the amended mappings, in line with a mandate from the CRR.
The implementing technical standards have been amended to reflect the allocation of appropriate risk-weights to the newly established ECAIs and to remove the reference to the de-registered ECAIs. Furthermore, the amendments reflect the outcome of a monitoring exercise on the adequacy of the existing mappings, based on the additional quantitative and qualitative information collected after the original Implementing Regulation entered into force. The details of the key amendments are as follows:
- Introduction of mappings for the two newly established ECAIs (Nordic Credit Rating A.S. and INBONIS S.A.)
- Removal, from the mapping tables, of CRAs that have lost ECAI status following their de‐registration as a CRA under the CRA Regulation
- Reflection of name change of a registered entity
- Amendments due to the re‐allocation of credit quality steps for two ECAIs
- Introduction of new credit rating scales for nine ECAIs
Additionally, ICAP S.A., an ECAI that was already captured by the monitoring exercise through the introduction of a new rating scale implemented changes in its rating scales following the closure of the consultation period. The changes relate to the denomination of the rating categories, to align with international practice. The number of rating categories, their definition, underlying risk profile, and related methodology remain unchanged. ESAs agreed to address the mapping for proportionality reasons, considering this relates strictly to a change in the symbols used to denote the mapped rating categories. Individual mapping reports have been also published on the EBA website, including for those ECAIs that expanded to additional standardized approach exposure classes or credit assessment types within their existing structure of credit rating scales: BCRA‐Credit Rating Agency AD, Capital Intelligence Ratings Ltd, Kroll Bond Rating Agency Europe Limited, Moody’s Investors Service, and Scope Ratings GmbH.
These revised implementing technical standards are part of the EU Single Rulebook for banking and insurance and are aimed at creating a safe and sound regulatory framework that is consistently applicable across EU. The implementing technical standards are intended to ensure that only credit ratings issued by ECAIs—that is, the credit rating agencies registered under Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 or central banks issuing credit ratings exempt from the application of the same regulation—can be used to calculate capital requirements of financial institutions and insurance undertakings. To this end, ESAs have specified this approach that establishes the correspondence or mapping between credit assessments and the credit quality steps defined in the EU prudential regulation for banking (CRR) and insurance (Solvency II Directive).
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Insurance, CRR, Solvency II, ECAI, Credit Rating Agencies, Implementing Technical Standards, Credit Risk, Standardized Approach, Basel, Regulatory Capital, ESAs
Previous ArticleEC Publishes Regulation on Key Aspects of Implementation of SA-CCR
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FED) published the final rule that amends Regulation I to reduce the quarterly reporting burden for member banks by automating the application process for adjusting their subscriptions to the Federal Reserve Bank capital stock, except in the context of mergers.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published its assessment of risks through the quarterly Risk Dashboard and the results of the Autumn edition of the Risk Assessment Questionnaire (RAQ).
The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) updated the guidelines on supervisory reporting requirements under the reporting framework 3.0.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) published a circular, along with the reporting form and instructions, for self-assessment, by authorized institutions, of compliance with the Code of Banking Practice 2021.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) decided to register European DataWarehouse Ltd and SecRep Limited as securitization repositories under the UK Securitization Regulation, with effect from January 17, 2022.
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2022/25, which supplements the Investment Firms Regulation (IFR or Regulation 2019/2033) with respect to the regulatory technical standards specifying the methods for measuring the K-factors referred to in Article 15 of the IFR.
The Bank of International Settlements (BIS) published a paper that assesses the ways in which platform-based business models can affect financial inclusion, competition, financial stability and consumer protection.
The Central Bank of Egypt (CBE) published a circular with instructions on emergency liquidity assistance to banks that are unable to meet their liquidity requirements.
The European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) published the list of identified financial conglomerates for 2021.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) updated the list of authorized deposit-taking institutions, granting license to Barclays Bank PLC and Crédit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank to operate as foreign authorized deposit-taking institutions under the Banking Act 1959.