EBA published bank-by-bank data from the seventh transparency exercise in EU. This additional data disclosure comes as a response to the outbreak of COVID-19 and provides market participants with bank-level data as of December 31, 2019, prior to the start of the crisis. Along with the data set, EBA also provided a document highlighting the key statistics derived from the data set and a wide range of interactive tools that allow users to compare and visualize data by using maps at a country and a bank-by-bank level. The data confirm that the banking sector in EU entered the crisis with solid capital positions and improved asset quality, but also shows the significant dispersion across banks.
In the context of an unprecedented health crisis, EU-wide transparency data confirms banks entered this challenging period in a stronger position than in previous crises. Compared with the Global Financial Crisis in 2008-2009, banks now hold larger capital and liquidity buffers. EU banks reported increasing capital ratios in 2019. The EU weighted-average common equity tier 1 (CET1) fully loaded capital ratio was at 14.8% as of the fourth quarter of 2019, nearly 40 bps higher than in the third quarter of 2019. The trend was supported by higher capital, but also contracting risk exposure amounts. As of December 2019, 75% of the banks reported a CET1 fully loaded capital ratio above 13.4% and all banks reported a ratio above 11%, well above the regulatory requirements.
The EU weighted fully phased-in leverage ratio stood at 5.5% as of December 2019. The leverage ratio increased by 30 bps compared to the previous quarter, driven by rising capital and declining exposures. The lowest reported leverage ratio was 4.7% at country level and 1.6% at bank level. The asset quality of EU banks has been on an improving trend over the last few years. As of the fourth quarter of 2019, the EU weighted average nonperforming loan ratio declined to 2.7%, 20 bps lower than in the third quarter of 2019. The ratio in the fourth quarter of 2019 was the lowest since the EBA introduced a harmonized definition of nonperforming loans across European countries. Dispersion in the nonperforming loan ratio across countries remained wide, with few banks still reporting double-digit ratios, although in the last quarter the inter-quartile range compressed by 80 bps, to 3.1%.
Earlier, EBA had postponed the EU-wide stress test exercise to 2021 to allow banks to focus on and ensure continuity of their core operations, including support for their customers. The Spring 2020 EU-wide transparency exercise comes as an exceptional disclosure in response to the outbreak of COVID-19. After postponing the EU-wide Stress Test to 2021, the Board of Supervisors agreed on an additional EU-wide transparency exercise to be carried out with the aim of providing updated information on bank exposures and asset quality to market participants. The transparency exercise is part of the ongoing efforts of EBA to foster transparency and market discipline in the EU financial market and complements banks’ own Pillar 3 disclosures, as laid down in the EU Capital Requirements Directive. Unlike stress tests, transparency exercises are purely disclosure exercises where only bank-by-bank data are published and no shocks are applied to the actual data. The Spring 2020 transparency exercise covers 127 banks from 27 European economic area countries and data is disclosed at the highest level of consolidation as of September 2019 and December 2019. The transparency exercise fully relies on supervisory reporting data.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, COVID-19, Spring 2020 Transparency Exercise, Transparency, Basel, Reporting, EBA
ECB published a decision allowing the euro area banks under its direct supervision to exclude certain central bank exposures from the leverage ratio.
ESAs launched a survey seeking feedback on the presentational aspects of product templates under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR or Regulation 2019/2088).
ECB published input of the European System of Central Banks (ESCB) into the EBA feasibility report on reducing the reporting burden for banks in EU.
ECB finalized the guide on assessment methodology for the internal model method for calculating exposure to counterparty credit risk (CCR) and the advanced method for own funds requirements for credit valuation adjustment (A-CVA) risk.
EBA published an Opinion addressed to EC to raise awareness about the opportunity to clarify certain issues related to the definition of credit institution in the upcoming review of the Capital Requirements Directive and Regulation (CRD and CRR).
APRA is consulting on updates to ARS 210.0, the reporting standard that sets out requirements for provision of information on liquidity and funding of an authorized deposit-taking institution.
FED released hypothetical scenarios for a second round of stress tests for banks.
FED is proposing to temporarily revise the capital assessments and stress testing reports (FR Y-14A/Q/M) to implement the changes necessary to conduct stressed analysis in connection with the re-submission of capital plans, using data as of June 30, 2020.
FED adopted a proposal to extend for three years, with revision, the information collection under the market risk capital rule (FR 4201; OMB No. 7100-0314).
EBA published a voluntary online survey seeking input from credit institutions on their practices and future plans for Pillar 3 disclosures on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks.