PRA published the policy statement PS13/21 that contains final policy on the approach to overseas internal ratings-based (IRB) models for credit risk. PS13/21 is relevant to UK banks, building societies, and PRA-designated investment firms. It contains the updated supervisory statement SS11/13 on IRB approaches, an updated pro-forma for firms to complete and submit for overseas models moving onto the overseas models approach, and the feedback to the responses to the consultation paper CP16/20 on the approach to overseas IRB models for credit risk. The updated SS11/13 will be effective from July 01, 2021.
PRA had published CP16/20 in October 2020, in which it had proposed to update the approach to overseas IRB models (overseas model approach) and set out additional criteria for use of the approach. As per the final policy in PS13/21, the following three changes have been made to the draft amendments to SS11/13 in light of the responses received:
- Aggregate amount of risk-weighted assets for credit risk derived using overseas models, and the aggregate amount of exposure value allowed on the overseas models approach, has been increased from 5.0% to 7.5%
- Scope of asset classes eligible for the overseas models approach has been expanded to include corporate small and medium-size enterprises (SMEs)
- Definition of the overseas models’ exposure value measure has been introduced
The first two changes expand the scope of overseas models approach and PRA considers that these changes will reduce the burden of modeling for firms without material impact on the maintenance of strong prudential standards. The third change clarifies the definition of exposure value, which should result in a consistent definition being used. However, PRA considers that these changes are not expected to have a significant cost impact on firms currently allowed to use overseas models in UK consolidated capital requirements and will not materially alter the benefits of the policy or the cost-benefit analysis presented in CP16/20. For the existing overseas IRB models built to non-UK requirements that are not currently used for UK consolidated capital requirements, firms can choose whether to use the overseas model approach. Firms that wish to use the overseas models approach can now submit applications using the updated pro forma and the implementation date for the changes resulting from this PS13/21 begins July 01, 2021. However, firms that do not wish to use the overseas models approach can continue not to use it for UK consolidated capital requirements. For the existing overseas IRB models built to non-UK requirements that are already used for UK consolidated capital requirements, there are three options:
- If these models meet the new PS13/21 criteria, they can continue to be used for UK consolidated capital requirements. Firms should submit a self-attestation that the criteria are met.
- If these models do not meet the overseas models approach criteria from July 01, 2021, firms may need to remediate these models to meet the UK IRB requirements or the criteria for the overseas models approach. PRA expects the models that do not meet the criteria to be remediated by January 01, 2023.
- If firms do not wish to use these models on the overseas models approach, they will need to develop models that meet the UK IRB requirements and discuss this with their supervisor.
Keywords: Europe, UK, Banking, IRB Approach, Credit Risk, Overseas Models Approach, Brexit, PS13/21, SS11/13, CP16/20, Internal Ratings Based, Basel, Regulatory Capital, CRR, PRA
Previous ArticleBSP Amends Derivatives Rules, Issues Liquidity Risk Guidelines
Next ArticleG7 Discusses Actions to Tackle Climate Change
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FED) published the final rule that amends Regulation I to reduce the quarterly reporting burden for member banks by automating the application process for adjusting their subscriptions to the Federal Reserve Bank capital stock, except in the context of mergers.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published its assessment of risks through the quarterly Risk Dashboard and the results of the Autumn edition of the Risk Assessment Questionnaire (RAQ).
The Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) updated the guidelines on supervisory reporting requirements under the reporting framework 3.0.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) published a circular, along with the reporting form and instructions, for self-assessment, by authorized institutions, of compliance with the Code of Banking Practice 2021.
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) decided to register European DataWarehouse Ltd and SecRep Limited as securitization repositories under the UK Securitization Regulation, with effect from January 17, 2022.
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2022/25, which supplements the Investment Firms Regulation (IFR or Regulation 2019/2033) with respect to the regulatory technical standards specifying the methods for measuring the K-factors referred to in Article 15 of the IFR.
The Bank of International Settlements (BIS) published a paper that assesses the ways in which platform-based business models can affect financial inclusion, competition, financial stability and consumer protection.
The Central Bank of Egypt (CBE) published a circular with instructions on emergency liquidity assistance to banks that are unable to meet their liquidity requirements.
The European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) published the list of identified financial conglomerates for 2021.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) updated the list of authorized deposit-taking institutions, granting license to Barclays Bank PLC and Crédit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank to operate as foreign authorized deposit-taking institutions under the Banking Act 1959.