OSFI published a letter and capital ruling that explains its considerations in determining that the Limited Recourse Capital Notes can qualify as Additional Tier 1 regulatory capital by the requesting bank and other federally regulated financial institutions, subject to certain limitations and disclosure requirements. A Canadian bank is now marketing this new financial instrument called a Limited Recourse Capital Note or LRCN. The bank had sought a ruling from OSFI regarding the regulatory capital treatment of the LRCNs. According to OSFI, the LRCN structure meets all of the criteria to be recognized as Additional Tier 1 regulatory capital by the bank and other federally regulated financial institutions.
As per the capital ruling, recognition of the LRCNs as Additional Tier 1 capital (or AT1) will be subject to certain limitations. OSFI may add to, amend, or delete these limitations at any time. Limitations may also vary by issuer and/or issuance. The LRCNs can only be issued to institutional investors. The LRCNs and preferred shares must have a minimum par or stated value of $1,000 and be traded on institutional desks (that is, not exchange-listed). The LRCNs must have an initial term to maturity of at least 60 years. Unless the instrument has been replaced with an instrument of higher capital quality (that is, CET1-qualifying common shares or retained earnings), the issuer will only be permitted to redeem the LRCNs or preferred shares where the carrying cost of the LRCNs or preferred shares exceeds the cost of replacement capital of equivalent quality (that is, AT1). The LRCN issuance will be subject to a cap of 0.75% of risk-weighted assets (that is, 50% of the AT1 bucket) as measured on the date of issuance. In calculating this limit, the issuer should compare the aggregate of its outstanding and proposed issuance of LRCNs on the date of issuance to 0.75% of the risk-weighted assets. The limit should consider the issuer's capital at the last reporting date with adjustments for subsequent transactions, including issuance, redemptions, buybacks, and acquisitions. Furthermore, OSFI specifies that the disclosure and marketing of the LRCNs to investors must clearly disclose how the LRCNs' risks are equivalent to the risks of investing in directly issued Tier 1-qualifying Non-Viability Contingent Capital (NVCC) preferred shares.
OSFI routinely assesses the quantity and quality of financial instruments that federally regulated financial institutions issue as regulatory capital and/or total loss absorbing capacity (TLAC). This is done to ensure that institutions maintain adequate capital and loss-absorbing capacity as required by their governing statutes and the OSFI guidance. OSFI has reviewed the quality of this structure relative to the eligibility criteria set out in Chapter 2 of the OSFI Capital Adequacy Requirements Guideline, with emphasis on economic substance over legal form. OSFI also considered the potential behavior and impact of the structure on financial stability, particularly in periods of stress.
Keywords: Americas, Canada, Banking, Regulatory Capital, Limited Recourse Capital Notes, LRCN, Additional Tier 1 Capital, Basel, Disclosures, CAR Guideline, OSFI
The three European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) issued a letter to inform about delay in the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) mandate, along with a Call for Evidence on greenwashing practices.
The International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) of the IFRS Foundations made several announcements at COP27 and with respect to its work on the sustainability standards.
The International Organization for Securities Commissions (IOSCO), at COP27, outlined the regulatory priorities for sustainability disclosures, mitigation of greenwashing, and promotion of integrity in carbon markets.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) issued a statement in the context of COP27, clarified the operationalization of intermediate EU parent undertakings (IPUs) of third-country groups
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) published an annual report on its activities, a report on forward-looking work.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) finalized amendments to the capital framework, announced a review of the prudential framework for groups.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hubs and several central banks are working together on various central bank digital currency (CBDC) pilots.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published the results of its thematic review, which shows that banks are still far from adequately managing climate and environmental risks.
Among its recent publications, the European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final standards and guidelines on interest rate risk arising from non-trading book activities (IRRBB)
The European Commission (EC) recently adopted regulations with respect to the calculation of own funds requirements for market risk, the prudential treatment of global systemically important institutions (G-SIIs)