BCBS and FSB published a report on supervisory issues associated with benchmark transition. The report includes insights on the remaining challenges to transition based on surveys undertaken by FSB, BCBS, and IAIS. In light of the survey results, the report sets out recommendations for authorities to support the progress of financial institutions and their clients in transitioning away from LIBOR. The report highlights that continued reliance of financial markets on LIBOR poses risks to global financial stability. Transition away from LIBOR by the end of 2021 requires significant commitment and sustained effort from both financial and non-financial institutions across many jurisdictions. The report responds to the G20 request to identify challenges to benchmark transition and to explore ways to address them. The report will be delivered to G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors ahead of their virtual meeting on July 18, 2020.
The survey results highlight that, compared to FSB jurisdictions, non-FSB jurisdictions are less likely to foresee significant risks in LIBOR transition, mainly due to perceptions of less frequent use of LIBOR in their financial systems. Most FSB jurisdictions have a strategy to address LIBOR transition, as opposed to only half of the surveyed non-FSB jurisdictions. Authorities in LIBOR jurisdictions are relatively more advanced in taking initiatives to facilitate and monitor benchmark transition. Financial institutions in these jurisdictions have shown better progress, although significant challenges remain. In light of the expected cessation of LIBOR after the end of 2021, authorities should strengthen their efforts in facilitating financial and non-financial institutions to transition away from LIBOR. The report includes three sets of recommendations to support LIBOR transition that should generally be applicable to all jurisdictions with LIBOR exposures:
- Identification of transition risks and challenges—Authorities and standard-setting bodies are recommended to issue public statements to promote awareness of LIBOR cessation and associated risks, both within financial institutions and across the financial system. Authorities should evaluate the need and then undertake regular surveys to monitor financial institutions’ exposure to LIBOR and identify possible areas of risk concentration. Supervisory authorities should take follow up actions in light of survey results. Authorities are also recommended to request regular updates from regulated financial institutions on key risks and action plans as well as on steps already taken, including identification of senior management responsible for transition.
- Facilitation of LIBOR transition—Authorities should establish a formal transition strategy supported by adequate resources and industry dialog. Supervisory authorities should consider increasing the intensity of supervisory actions when the preparatory work of individual banks is unsatisfactory.
- Coordination—Authorities are recommended to promote industry-wide coordination, maintain dialog on the adoption of fallback language, consider identifying legislative solutions where necessary, and exchange information on best practices and challenges.
As part of the next steps, FSB, in collaboration with other international bodies and standard-setting bodies, will design a simple set of key metrics or indicators to update the global LIBOR exposures and transition status and will identify a list of qualitative questions to monitor the progress in implementing the above recommendations. The aim is to provide another assessment of the transition progress by early next year. FSB will continue to monitor the evolving impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the ongoing benchmark transition. FSB will incorporate the findings from its monitoring exercise into the annual progress report of FSB on the implementation of recommendations to reform major interest rate benchmarks (a report that is to be published before the G20 Summit in November).
Keywords: International, Banking, Securities, Interest Rate Benchmark, LIBOR, Risk-Free Rates, IBOR Transition, OTC Derivatives, Basel, BCBS, FSB
Previous ArticleOJK Consults on Rules for Reporting by Commercial Banks
FCA and PRA in the UK, FED in the US, and the authorities in Singapore have fined Goldman Sachs for risk management failures in connection with the 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB).
BCBS announced that OSFI and the Bank of Canada hosted the 21st International Conference of Banking Supervisors (ICBS) virtually on October 19-22, 2020.
FCA proposed guidance on how firms should continue to seek to help customers who hold insurance and premium finance products and may be in financial difficulty because of COVID-19, after October 31, 2020.
EBA issued an opinion on prudential treatment of the legacy instruments as the grandfathering period nears an end on December 31, 2021.
ESRB published the fifth issue of the EU Non-bank Financial Intermediation Risk Monitor 2020 (NBFI Monitor).
HM Treasury announced that the new Financial Services Bill has been introduced in the Parliament.
APRA announced that it has increased the minimum liquidity requirement of Bendigo and Adelaide Bank for failing to comply with the prudential standard on liquidity.
PRA published the consultation paper CP17/20 to propose changes to certain rules, supervisory statements, and statements of policy to implement elements of the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5).
US Agencies adopted a final rule that applies to advanced approaches banking organizations and aims to reduce interconnectedness in the financial system as well as to reduce contagion risks associated with the failure of a global systemically important bank (G-SIB).
US Agencies (FDIC, FED, and OCC) adopted a final rule that implements the net stable funding ratio (NSFR) for certain large banking organizations.