BCBS and FSB published a report on supervisory issues associated with benchmark transition. The report includes insights on the remaining challenges to transition based on surveys undertaken by FSB, BCBS, and IAIS. In light of the survey results, the report sets out recommendations for authorities to support the progress of financial institutions and their clients in transitioning away from LIBOR. The report highlights that continued reliance of financial markets on LIBOR poses risks to global financial stability. Transition away from LIBOR by the end of 2021 requires significant commitment and sustained effort from both financial and non-financial institutions across many jurisdictions. The report responds to the G20 request to identify challenges to benchmark transition and to explore ways to address them. The report will be delivered to G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors ahead of their virtual meeting on July 18, 2020.
The survey results highlight that, compared to FSB jurisdictions, non-FSB jurisdictions are less likely to foresee significant risks in LIBOR transition, mainly due to perceptions of less frequent use of LIBOR in their financial systems. Most FSB jurisdictions have a strategy to address LIBOR transition, as opposed to only half of the surveyed non-FSB jurisdictions. Authorities in LIBOR jurisdictions are relatively more advanced in taking initiatives to facilitate and monitor benchmark transition. Financial institutions in these jurisdictions have shown better progress, although significant challenges remain. In light of the expected cessation of LIBOR after the end of 2021, authorities should strengthen their efforts in facilitating financial and non-financial institutions to transition away from LIBOR. The report includes three sets of recommendations to support LIBOR transition that should generally be applicable to all jurisdictions with LIBOR exposures:
- Identification of transition risks and challenges—Authorities and standard-setting bodies are recommended to issue public statements to promote awareness of LIBOR cessation and associated risks, both within financial institutions and across the financial system. Authorities should evaluate the need and then undertake regular surveys to monitor financial institutions’ exposure to LIBOR and identify possible areas of risk concentration. Supervisory authorities should take follow up actions in light of survey results. Authorities are also recommended to request regular updates from regulated financial institutions on key risks and action plans as well as on steps already taken, including identification of senior management responsible for transition.
- Facilitation of LIBOR transition—Authorities should establish a formal transition strategy supported by adequate resources and industry dialog. Supervisory authorities should consider increasing the intensity of supervisory actions when the preparatory work of individual banks is unsatisfactory.
- Coordination—Authorities are recommended to promote industry-wide coordination, maintain dialog on the adoption of fallback language, consider identifying legislative solutions where necessary, and exchange information on best practices and challenges.
As part of the next steps, FSB, in collaboration with other international bodies and standard-setting bodies, will design a simple set of key metrics or indicators to update the global LIBOR exposures and transition status and will identify a list of qualitative questions to monitor the progress in implementing the above recommendations. The aim is to provide another assessment of the transition progress by early next year. FSB will continue to monitor the evolving impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the ongoing benchmark transition. FSB will incorporate the findings from its monitoring exercise into the annual progress report of FSB on the implementation of recommendations to reform major interest rate benchmarks (a report that is to be published before the G20 Summit in November).
Keywords: International, Banking, Securities, Interest Rate Benchmark, LIBOR, Risk-Free Rates, IBOR Transition, OTC Derivatives, Basel, BCBS, FSB
Previous ArticleAPRA Updates Regulatory Approach to Loan Deferrals Amid COVID Crisis
PRA, via the consultation paper CP12/20, proposed changes to its rules, supervisory statements, and statements of policy to implement certain elements of the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5).
EIOPA published the financial stability report that provides detailed quantitative and qualitative assessment of the key risks identified for the insurance and occupational pensions sectors in the European Economic Area.
EBA published its risk dashboard for the first quarter of 2020 together with the results of the risk assessment questionnaire.
EBA announced that the next stress testing exercise is expected to be launched at the end of January 2021 and its results are to be published at the end of July 2021.
PRA published the consultation paper CP11/20 that sets out its expectations and guidance related to auditors’ work on the matching adjustment under Solvency II.
MAS published a statement guidance on dividend distribution by banks.
APRA updated its capital management guidance for banks, particularly easing restrictions around paying dividends as institutions continue to manage the disruption caused by COVID-19 pandemic.
FSB published a report that reviews the progress on data collection for macro-prudential analysis and the availability and use of macro-prudential tools in Germany.
EBA issued a statement reminding financial institutions that the transition period between EU and UK will expire on December 31, 2020; this will end the possibility for the UK-based financial institutions to offer financial services to EU customers on a cross-border basis via passporting.
SRB published guidance on operational continuity in resolution and financial market infrastructure (FMI) contingency plans.