EBA Offers Clarification on Implementation of Investment Firms Regime
EBA published an Opinion that provides guidance on the actions to be taken in case of uncertainty on whether investment firms should apply for an authorization as a credit institution in the absence of the delegated act establishing the methodology for the calculation of the highest threshold (the EUR 30 billion threshold), on which the EBA has currently opened a second public consultation. The Opinion is meant to ease implementation of the Investment Firms Regulation (IFR) and Directive (IFD), which entered into force on June 26, 2021. The opinion provides clarity to both investment firms and their supervisors in the cases in which uncertainty about the relevant classification and the subsequent need for application for an authorization as a credit institution arises in the absence of the technical standards.
The IFR and IFD classify investment firms according to their business model and size, with the size being benchmarked on various thresholds. For a vast majority of investment firms, sufficient clarity already exists with regard to the prudential regime, which applies to them. However, in a few cases, especially for investment firms of third-country groups, the Opinion provides guidance on the actions to be taken in case of uncertainty on whether these investment firms should apply for an authorization as a credit institution in the absence of the delegated act establishing the methodology for the calculation of the highest threshold. EBA advises competent authorities to apply a pragmatic approach for investment firms in cases where the relevant EUR 30 billion threshold for the identification of the prudential regime to be applied to the investment firm cannot be determined without the guidance provided in the EBA technical standards that are being consulted on. EBA advises supervisors not to prioritize any supervisory or enforcement action in relation to the identification of investments firms, until six months after the final methodology is in place. While EBA cannot provide a proposal for a delegated act with the Opinion, it intends to do so as soon as possible following the ongoing consultation period. EBA requests that EC adopt the technical standards by means of a delegated regulation as quickly as possible after their submission by EBA to provide the necessary legal certainty and resolve the issues highlighted in the Opinion.
Related Links
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Securities, Investment Firms, Regulatory Technical Standards, IFD, IFR, Opinion, CRD, Basel, Credit Institutions, Third Country Groups, EBA
Featured Experts
María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer
Nicolas Degruson
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.
Patrycja Oleksza
Applies proficiency and knowledge to regulatory capital and reporting analysis and coordinates business and product strategies in the banking technology area
Previous Article
EBA Amends Decision on Unsolicited Credit Assessments by ECAIsRelated Articles
EC to Defer Application of SFDR Standards Till July 2022
The European Commission (EC) announced plans to defer the application of 13 regulatory technical standards under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (2019/2088) by six months, from January 01, 2022 to July 01, 2022.
BoE Consults on Approach to Setting MREL, Publishes Bail-In Guidance
The Bank of England (BoE) published a consultation paper on approach to setting minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL), an operational guide on executing bail-in, and a statement from the Deputy Governor Dave Ramsden.
EBA Seeks Views on Proportionality Assessment Methodology
The European Banking Authority (EBA) is seeking preliminary input on standardization of the proportionality assessment methodology for credit institutions and investment firms.
US Agencies Propose Changes to Call Reports and Instructions
Certain regulatory authorities in the US are extending period for completion of the review of certain residential mortgage provisions and for publication of notice disclosing the determination of this review until December 20, 2021.
PRA Finalizes Rulebook Definition of Higher Paid Material Risk-Taker
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the policy statement PS18/21, which introduces an amendment in the definition of "higher paid material risk taker" in the Remuneration Part of the PRA Rulebook.
EBA Examines Asset Encumbrance in Banking Sector
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published its annual report on asset encumbrance in banking sector.
EBA Publishes Methodological Guide to Mystery Shopping
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published a methodological guide to mystery shopping.
APRA Issues Update on Capital Reform Policy Settings for Banks
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) released a letter to authorized deposit-taking institutions to provide an update on key policy settings for the capital framework reforms, which will come into effect from January 01, 2023.
CPMI-IOSCO Assess Continuity Planning of Market Infrastructures
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) published a report that assesses the business continuity planning activities of financial market infrastructures or FMIs.
ESMA Responds to Proposal Related to Sustainability Standards Board
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has responded to the IFRS consultation on targeted amendments to the IFRS Foundation constitution to accommodate an International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) to set IFRS Sustainability Standards.
