ECB Paper on Impact of Bank Funding Shocks on Credit Reallocation
ECB published a paper that presents a comprehensive analysis of the sector- and firm-specific strategies that banks follow when their funding is affected by a negative shock. The authors focus on assessing the impact of bank funding shocks on credit allocation by banks, also providing evidence on the strategic lending decisions made by banks facing a negative funding shock and describing the implications of the findings for bank regulators.
The paper provides the results on the average impact of the interbank funding shock as well as the reallocation effects.Using bank-firm level credit data, the authors show that banks reallocate credit within their loan portfolio in at least three different ways. First, banks reallocate to sectors where they have a high market share. Second, they also reallocate to sectors in which they are more specialized. Third, they reallocate credit toward low-risk firms. These reallocation effects are economically large. A standard deviation increase in sector market share, sector specialization, or firm soundness reduces the transmission of the funding shock to credit supply by 22%, 8% and 10%, respectively. Overall, banks reallocate credit toward firms with low debt levels, low default risk, high available collateral, and a high interest coverage ratios. The paper also provides insights on the timing of funding shock impact and the timing of the reallocation channels. It investigates whether the funding shock has real effects on firm investment and growth, before presenting its conclusions.
The findings also contain interesting information for bank regulators. The results reveal a bright sight of lending concentration during the times of crisis and are thus informative when making the trade-off between portfolio concentration risk and having sufficient information about borrowers. Finally, the results suggest that not only systemic risk and financial stability issues should be taken into account when studying the welfare implications of portfolio diversification, but that it could also be relevant to consider the potentially beneficial impact of lending concentration on firm credit supply.
Related Link: Working Paper (PDF)
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Concentration Risk, Systemic Risk, Credit Risk, Credit Allocation, Research, ECB
Previous Article
US Senator Calls on FED to Raise Capital Buffer for Largest BanksRelated Articles
|
News
EBA Single Rulebook Q&A: Fourth Update for March 2019EBA published answers to five questions under the Single Rulebook question and answer (Q&A) updates for this week.
March 22, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
ECB Updates Validation Checks and List of Identifiers Under AnaCreditECB updated the AnaCredit validation checks (Version 1.4) and the list of national identifiers (version 2.4) for AnaCredit reporting.
March 21, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
BCBS Publishes Results of the Basel III Monitoring ExerciseBCBS published results of the Basel III monitoring exercise based on data as of June 30, 2018.
March 20, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
EBA, FCA, and PRA Agree on MoU Template for Supervisory CooperationEBA, FCA, and PRA announced that they have agreed on a template for the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) that sets out the expectations for supervisory cooperation and information-sharing arrangements between UK and EU/European Economic Area national authorities.
March 20, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
HKMA Publishes CoP on Loss-Absorbing Capacity Requirements of BanksHKMA issued, in relation to the Financial Institutions Resolution (Loss-Absorbing Capacity Requirements—Banking Sector) Rules (LAC Rules) a chapter of a code of practice (LAC CoP) under section 196 of the Financial Institutions Resolution Ordinance (FIRO).
March 20, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
EBA Publishes Reports Monitoring the Implementation of Basel III in EUEBA published two reports measuring the impact of implementing the final Basel III reforms and monitoring the implementation of liquidity measures in EU.
March 20, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
BCBS Publishes Results of Survey on Proportionality in Bank RegulationBCBS published a report presenting the results of a survey conducted on proportionality practices in bank regulation and supervision.
March 19, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
US Agencies Adopt Interim Rule to Facilitate Transfers of Legacy SwapsUS Agencies (FCA, FDIC, FED, FHFA, and OCC) are adopting and inviting comments on an interim final rule.
March 19, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
EBA Updates List of Other Systemically Important Institutions in EUEBA updated the 2018 list of other systemically important institutions (O-SIIs) in EU. The list also reflects the additional capital buffers that the relevant authorities have set for the identified O-SIIs.
March 19, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
|
News
HKMA Expects Banks to Manage Risks Related to Crypto-Asset ExposuresHKMA issued a statement announcing that it expects authorized institutions to take note of the BCBS statement on crypto-assets and its prudential expectations.
March 18, 2019
WebPage
Regulatory News
|
