CBRC published a joint comment letter on the proposals from EC to further strengthen the resilience of EU banks; this relates particularly to Article 21b of the Capital Requirement Directive (CRD) that requires non-EU groups above certain threshold to establish intermediate EU parent undertakings (IPU) in the EU. This joint comment letter by the People’s Bank of China and CBRC was sent to the EC, the Council of the EU, and the European Parliament.
CBRC welcomed the presidency compromise from the EU Council on November 27, 2017; specifically the removal of the requirement that any global systemically important institutions (G-SII) from a third-country group, regardless of the number of institutions it has, shall establish an IPU in the EU. However, certain aspects of the proposed amendments to the CRD, along with the respective comments from the Council of EU and ECB, need further consideration. CBRC has raised concerns on the following issues:
- Chinese authorities have not imposed any comparable IPU requirements on foreign financial institutions in China.
- Considering that the intended supervisory benefits may not be proportionate to the potential compliance cost, CBRC suggested reconsideration of the threshold of EUR 30 billion for the proposed EU IPU requirements (as a reference, the US Intermediate Holding Company (IHC) requirements have a threshold of USD 50 billion of total assets in the US, excluding those of branches).
- CBRC also suggested reconsideration on the appropriateness of calculating total assets, including those of branches, and incorporating existing branches into the new IPU.
- The supervision of financial holding companies and mixed financial holding companies needs clarification.
Related Link: Joint Comment Letter
Previous ArticleEIOPA Publishes the Updated Work Program for 2018
BCBS Finalizes Revisions to Credit Valuation Adjustment Risk Framework
PRA published a statement to insurers that clarifies the approach to application of the matching adjustment during COVID-19 crisis.
EBA published a report on the implementation of selected COVID-19 policies within the prudential framework for banking sector.
EC launched a consultation to revise the network and information systems (NIS) Directive (2016/1148), which was adopted in July 2016 and is the first horizontal internal market instrument aimed at improving the resilience of the EU against cybersecurity risks.
PRA published a statement that outlines its view on the implications of LIBOR transition for contracts in scope of the “Contractual Recognition of Bail-In” and “Stay in Resolution” parts of the PRA Rulebook.
PRA published the policy statement PS15/20 to reflect additional resilience associated with higher macro-prudential buffers in a standard risk environment with a reduction in Pillar 2A capital requirements.
BCBS published the eighteenth progress report on implementation of the Basel III regulatory framework in member jurisdictions.
FCA announced proposals that would provide continued support for certain consumer credit products to users, who are facing a financial impact because of the exceptional circumstances arising from the COVID-19 pandemic.
ACPR published a draft version of taxonomy RAN 1.4.0_PWD1, along with the related documentation, for Solvency II reporting.
BCBS amended the guidelines on sound management of risks related to money laundering and financing of terrorism (ML/FT).