OSFI issued a letter to federally regulated deposit-taking institutions on the capital treatment of new loans to businesses through the Highly Affected Sectors Credit Availability Program (HASCAP). The government of Canada mandated the Business Development Bank of Canada (BDC) to set up the HASCAP loan guarantee program and work with eligible lenders to provide additional liquidity for Canadian businesses highly affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. OSFI expects federally regulated lenders to treat HASCAP loans as a sovereign exposure based on the BDC guarantee and to apply the relevant risk-weight under the Capital Adequacy Requirements Guideline of OSFI.
The OSFI letter is addressed to banks, bank holding companies, and federally regulated trust and loan companies. The letter specifies the following key points:
- The BDC guarantee can be recognized as a guarantee under the Capital Adequacy Requirements Guideline, as it meets the related operational requirements set out in paragraphs 75 and 76 of Chapter 5 of the Guideline.
- If there are currency or maturity mismatches, the amount of the guarantee recognized for capital purposes would need to be adjusted according to section 5.1.6 of the Capital Adequacy Requirements Guideline.
- Under the Standardized Approach to credit risk, the guaranteed loan would receive the risk-weight applicable to the government of Canada (0%), the guarantor.
- Under the Internal Ratings Based Approach to credit risk, the guaranteed loan would be treated with the Probability of Default substitution approach and/or the Loss Given Default adjustment approach as outlined in section 6.8.7 (ix) of the Capital Adequacy Requirements Guideline.
- In calculating the leverage ratio, the entire amount of the loan would need to be included in the exposure measure of the leverage ratio pursuant to the Leverage Requirements Guideline paragraph 12.
By announcing the capital treatment of this loan program, OSFI is providing timely direction for institutions, financial markets, and borrowers. These and other responsive regulatory adjustments, in addition to the ongoing supervisory vigilance, ensure that the OSFI guidance is appropriate for these extraordinary circumstances while remaining risk-focused and forward‑looking. OSFI will continue to look for ways to ensure its capital and liquidity requirements are fit for purpose during the pandemic.
Keywords: Americas, Canada, Banking, COVID-19, Regulatory Capital, CAR Guideline Leverage Requirements Guideline, Basel, Guarantee Scheme, Loan Guarantee, Credit Risk, OSFI
Previous ArticleHKMA Announces Success of Green Bond Offering from HKSAR
BIS published a paper that provides an overview on the use of big data and machine learning in the central bank community.
APRA finalized the reporting standard ARS 115.0 on capital adequacy with respect to the standardized measurement approach to operational risk for authorized deposit-taking institutions in Australia.
ECB published a guide that outlines the principles and methods for calculating the penalties for regulatory breaches of prudential requirements by banks.
MAS and The Association of Banks in Singapore (ABS) jointly issued a paper that sets out good practices for the management of operational and other risks stemming from new work arrangements adopted by financial institutions amid the COVID-19 pandemic.
ACPR announced that a new data collection application, called DLPP (Datalake for Prudential), for collecting banking and insurance prudential data will go into production on April 12, 2021.
BCB announced that the Financial Stability Committee decided to maintain the countercyclical capital buffer (CCyB) for Brazil at 0%, at least until the end of 2021.
EIOPA has launched a European-wide comparative study on non-life underwriting risk in internal models, also kicking-off of the data collection phase.
SRB published an overview of the resolution tools available in the Banking Union and their impact on a bank’s ability to maintain continuity of access to financial market infrastructure services in resolution.
EBA is consulting on the implementing technical standards for Pillar 3 disclosures on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) risks, as set out in requirements under Article 449a of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
ESAs Issue Advice on KPIs on Sustainability for Nonfinancial Reporting