BIS Paper Analyzes Operational and Cyber Risks in Financial Sector
BIS published a working paper that uses a unique cross-country dataset at the loss event level to document the evolution and characteristics of the operational risk of banks. The paper highlights that better supervision is associated with lower operational losses. It also provides an estimate of losses due to cyber events, which constitute a subset of operational loss events. Cyber losses are a small fraction of total operational losses, but can account for a significant share of total operational value-at-risk.
Representing a significant portion of total bank risks, operational risks are second only to credit risks as a source of losses. Thus, measuring and understanding operational risks, including cyber risks, is critical for both banks and public authorities. The paper uses a unique cross-country dataset from ORX, which is a consortium of financial institutions. The sample contains over 700,000 operational loss events from 2002 until the end of 2017 for a group of 74 large banks with headquarters worldwide. The granularity of the dataset allowed the authors to study the evolution of operational risks through time, compute an operational and cyber value-at-risk for financial intermediaries, document the time lag between occurrence, discovery and recognition of losses, and investigate the link between operational losses, macroeconomic conditions, and regulatory characteristics.
The results of the study show that, after a spike following the Great Financial Crisis, operational losses have fallen in recent years. The spike was largely due to losses arising from improper business practices in large banks that were incurred in the run-up to the crisis but recognized only later. Operational value-at-risk can vary substantially across banks—from 6% to 12% of total gross income—depending on the method used. These numbers are consistent with the actual capital requirements, but notably smaller than the basic indicator approach. The results provide some support for the shift to the standardized approach in Basel III.
The analysis shows that it takes, on average, more than a year for operational losses to be discovered and recognized in the books. However, there is significant variation across regions and event types. For instance, improper business practices and internal fraud events take longer to be discovered. Operational losses are not independent of macroeconomic conditions and regulatory characteristics. The paper shows that credit booms and periods of excessively accommodative monetary policy are followed by larger operational losses. Furthermore, it is to be noted that a higher quality of financial regulation and supervision is also associated with lower cyber losses. Despite representing a relatively minor share of operational losses, cyber losses can account for up to a third of total operational value-at-risk.
Related Links
Keywords: International, Banking, Operational Risk, Value-at-Risk, Cyber Risk, Standardized Approach, Research, BIS
Featured Experts
María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer
Pierre-Etienne Chabanel
Brings expertise in technology and software solutions around banking regulation, whether deployed on-premises or in the cloud.
Nicolas Degruson
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.
Previous Article
ISDA Updates List of Derivative Instruments Subject to Margin RulesRelated Articles
BoE Clarifies Approach to Treatment of Payment Holidays on Form PL
BoE published a statistical notice (Notice 2020/9) explaining the approach for treatment of payment holidays on the profit and loss return or Form PL.
BoE Provides Reporting Update on Form AS and Form FV
BoE updated the known issues document for the statistical reporting Forms AS and FV.
FED Announces Capital Requirements for Large Banks
FED announced individual capital requirements for 34 large banks and these requirements go into effect on October 01, 2020.
SRB Publishes Guidance on Implementation of Bail-In Tool
SRB published a set of documents to give operational guidance to banks on implementation of the bail-in tool.
BIS Publishes Update on G20 TechSprint Initiative
BIS published an update on the G20 TechSprint Initiative, which was launched in April 2020 and aims to highlight the potential for technologies to resolve regulatory compliance (regtech) and supervisory (suptech) challenges.
OSFI Provides Update on Implementation of IFRS 17 in Canada
OSFI published a letter that provides an update on the milestones for the implementation of the IFRS 17 standard on insurance contracts.
EBA Provides Clarity on Implementation of Guidance on COVID Reporting
EBA updated the report on the implementation of selected COVID-19 policies.
FSI Note Discusses Challenges Associated with COVID Relief Measures
The Financial Stability Institute (FSI) of BIS published a brief note that examines the supervisory challenges associated with certain temporary regulatory relief measures introduced by BCBS and prudential authorities in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.
BCBS Consults on Principles for Operational Risk and Resilience
BCBS is consulting on the principles for operational resilience and the revisions to the principles for sound management of operational risk for banks.
BoE Updates Template and Definitions for Form ER
BoE updated the reporting template for Form ER as well as the Form ER definitions, which contain guidance on the methodology to be used in calculating annualized interest rates.
