MAS published the response to feedback received on proposed amendments to MAS Notice 1111 on risk-based capital adequacy requirements for merchant banks in Singapore. Based on the responses received and certain other factors, MAS has decided not to proceed with the proposed amendments to MAS Notice 1111 and will continue to apply the existing requirements under this notice.
In October 2014, MAS had consulted on the amendments to MAS Notice 1111 to strengthen the capital framework for merchant banks by incorporating key components of the Basel III capital standards as were then set out by BCBS. Annex A contains the list of respondents to the consultation. Some respondents supported adopting key components of the Basel III capital standards in the capital framework for Singapore-incorporated merchant banks, to enhance their resilience in times of stress. Other respondents commented that the nature of activities and risks undertaken by merchant banks should be considered in determining the appropriate capital standards.
In December 2017, BCBS had finalized reforms to the Basel III capital standards that apply to internationally active banks, while giving national supervisors the discretion to apply prudential standards to banks that are not internationally active. In this context, MAS will not proceed with the proposed amendments to MAS Notice 1111. The existing risk-based capital requirements under MAS Notice 1111 will continue to apply to Singapore-incorporated merchant banks. MAS will consider the appropriateness of the revised Basel capital standards for merchant banks, and consult the industry on any proposed revisions.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Singapore, Banking, Basel III, Capital Adequacy, Risk-based Capital Requirements, MAS Notice 1111, MAS
Previous ArticleFFIEC Announces Availability of 2018 Data on Mortgage Lending
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) published a new set of frequently asked questions (FAQs) to clarify the regulatory capital treatment of investments in the overseas deposit-taking and insurance subsidiaries.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) issued the policy statement PS20/21, which contains final rules for the application of existing consolidated prudential requirements to financial holding companies and mixed financial holding companies.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final report on the guidelines specifying the criteria to assess the exceptional cases when institutions exceed the large exposure limits and the time and measures needed for institutions to return to compliance.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) revised the guidelines on stress tests to be conducted by the national deposit guarantee schemes under the Deposit Guarantee Schemes Directive (DGSD).
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) issued a circular, for all authorized institutions, to confirm its support of an information note that sets out various options available in the loan market for replacing USD LIBOR with the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR).
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued a new "Problem Bank Supervision" booklet of the Comptroller's Handbook. The booklet covers information on timely identification and rehabilitation of problem banks and their advanced supervision, enforcement, and resolution when conditions warrant.
The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) launched a consultation on the standards for market risk capital and the associated reporting requirements for banks incorporated in Singapore.
The tech lab of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) selected three winning teams in a tech sprint designed to explore new technologies and techniques to help banks meet the needs of unbanked consumers.
PRA published a "Dear CEO" letter that sets out findings of a review on the reliability of regulatory reporting and reiterates the supervisory expectations on regulatory reporting.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) confirmed that its new data collection solution APRA Connect will go live on September 13, 2021.