The European Banking Authority (EBA) published report on the application of the guidelines on the remuneration of sales staff. The guidelines have been in force since 2016. EBA assessed how a sample of 70 financial institutions from 12 member states are applying these guidelines. The analysis focused on institutions’ internal arrangements for designing, approving, and monitoring the remuneration policy and practices for sales staff, in particular the practices for awarding variable remuneration to sales staff. The EBA assessment revealed that financial institutions focus more on prudential requirements and commercial interests than on meeting the interests of consumers. However, EBA also identified good practices that are considered to be compliant with the guidelines.
The assessment shows that, in terms of governance structures, the design, approval, and monitoring of the remuneration policies and practices are often handled by the same function, thus increasing the risk of an inaction bias when reviewing the remuneration policies and practices. However, EBA also identified 17 distinct good practices that are considered as compliant with the guidelines, with it being a good practice for financial institutions to:
- Involve their human resources, compliance, and risk management functions in the design of the policies
- Involve shareholders before granting variable remuneration in excess of 100% of fixed remuneration
- Apply a mix of quantitative and qualitative criteria when determining the variable remuneration of sales staff
- Not consider sales performance as the determining criterion for the promotion of staff
- Implement measures that explicitly "disincentivize" sales staff from acting in a way that gives rise to consumer detriment
- Include in the key performance indicators that determine variable remuneration some measurements of customer satisfaction or, conversely, customer detriment
- Establish a "gatekeeper provision"— that is, reduce or forfeit the variable remuneration of sales staff when they acted to the consumer’s detriment
- Ensure that payout curves for variable remuneration do not set incentives to maximize sales at a specific point
Regarding the awarding of variable remuneration, institutions should be more mindful of incorporating consumer interest in the procedures to grant such remuneration. As such, it may not be enough not to set any incentives for sales staff to act to the consumers’ detriment, but instead it could be beneficial to set disincentives to do so. Furthermore, when it comes to monitoring residual risk for consumer detriment, EBA is of the view that institutions can and should do more to implement appropriate and specific control mechanisms. The report also notes that differences in application may also be traced back to the different regulatory requirements applying to each kind of institution. The EBA and relevant competent authorities plan to continue to monitor how institutions apply these and whether they make use of the good practices identified in this report.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, CRD, Governance, Remuneration, Operational Risk, Basel, Guideline, EBA
Previous ArticleHKMA Sets Out Practices to Support Transition to Carbon Neutrality
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published four draft principles to support supervisory efforts in assessing the representativeness of COVID-19-impacted data for banks using the internal ratings based (IRB) credit risk models.
The European Council and the European Parliament (EP) reached a provisional political agreement on the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD).
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) launched a consultation (CP6/22) that sets out proposal for a new Supervisory Statement on expectations for management of model risk by banks.
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2022/954, which amends regulatory technical standards on specification of the calculation of specific and general credit risk adjustments.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub updated its work program, announcing a set of projects across various centers.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published two consultation papers—one on the supervisory statement on exclusions related to systemic events and the other on the supervisory statement on the management of non-affirmative cyber exposures.
Certain members of the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs issued a letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published a consultation paper on the advice on the review of the securitization prudential framework in Solvency II.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) issued a statement on PRA buffer adjustment while the Bank of England (BoE) published a notice on the statistical reporting requirements for banks.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) issued principles for the effective management and supervision of climate-related financial risks.