APRA issued a consultation letter to the authorized deposit-taking institutions regarding potential changes to APS 220, the prudential standard on credit risk management. This consultation will ensure appropriate alignment with the non-authorized deposit-taking institution lenders' regime, which has been closely based on certain requirements in the new APS 220. The regime of non-authorized deposit-taking institution lenders is one of the key elements of the government reforms proposed in September 2020. The proposed changes will be contingent on the related government reforms passing as legislation. APRA is seeking feedback on these proposals by January 29, 2021.
APRA had finalized the new APS 220 In December 2019, for implemented from January 01, 2021. However, with the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, APRA had delayed the implementation of APS 220 by 12 months. Then, in September 2020, the government announced a series of proposed reforms to consumer credit laws. One key element of the proposed reforms is that authorized deposit-taking institutions would no longer be subject to the Responsible Lending Obligations, which had been administered by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC). The other element is that non-authorized deposit-taking institution lenders would be subject to new lending requirements, administered by ASIC, based largely on certain requirements in the new APS 220. APRA is not planning material revisions to the credit-related prudential standards or guidance. However, some amendments will be necessary in the event that the proposed credit reforms of the government are passed as legislation.
Therefore, APRA is commencing a consultation on the new APS 220 to ensure appropriate alignment with the regime for the non-authorized deposit-taking institution lenders. Consequently, APRA is proposing the following changes:
- APRA is proposing an amendment to the new APS 220 that would require authorized deposit-taking institutions to assess the capacity of an individual borrower to repay credit without substantial hardship. This is similar to the government’s proposed requirements of non-authorized deposit-taking institution lenders. APRA will give effect to this amendment through an addition to paragraph 41 of the new APS 220. This amendment is consistent with the existing requirements of APRA and will not impose additional burden on authorized deposit-taking institutions.
- APRA is proposing to more closely align the implementation date of the new APS 220 with the proposed consumer credit reforms of the government, if this is earlier than January 01, 2022. An earlier implementation date is unlikely to create material additional regulatory burden for authorized deposit-taking institutions. Industry has been aware of the details of the new APS 220 since late 2019 and APRA expects that most authorized deposit-taking institutions would already be in compliance with the new APS 220 requirements. APRA will not implement the new APS 220 any earlier than April 01, 2021.
If the proposed government reforms are not passed as legislation, APRA will not progress the proposed revisions. APRA anticipates that it will finalize APG 220, the Prudential Practice Guide on credit risk management, in the first quarter of 2021. Depending on the outcome of the proposed credit reforms of the government, around this time, APRA may also consult on amendments to the APG 223 on residential mortgage lending. On the basis of the current proposals, APRA does not expect that revisions to APG 223 would be material. From October 2020 to January 2021, APRA is also consulting on ARS 220.0, the draft reporting standard on credit risk management. APRA highlights that the changes proposed in this letter will not affect the proposed timelines for ARS 220.0. The proposed first reporting period for ARS 220.0 will remain for the quarter ending March 31, 2022.
Comment Due Date: January 29, 2021
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Australia, Banking, APS 220, Credit Risk, COVID-19, Regulatory Capital, APG 220, ARS 220, Residential Mortgage Lending, Basel, APRA
Previous ArticleSRB Held Annual Conference, Discussed Future of Bank Resolution
The Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI) published an update on the discussion paper that intended to engage federally regulated financial institutions and other interested stakeholders in a dialog with OSFI, to proactively enhance and align assurance expectations over key regulatory returns.
The European Commission (EC) published a report summarizing responses to the targeted consultation on the supervisory convergence and the single rulebook in the European Union (EU).
The European Central Bank (ECB) published its opinion on a proposal for a regulation on European green bonds, following a request from the European Parliament.
The Advisory Scientific Committee (ASC) of the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB) published a report that explores the expected impact of digitalization on provision of financial and banking services, and proposes policy measures to address the risks stemming from digitalization.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) is consulting on the draft Financial Institutions (Resolution) Ordinance (Cap. 628), or FIRO, Code of Practice chapter on liquidity and funding in resolution, until March 14, 2022.
The Swedish Financial Supervisory Authority (FI) announced that the capital adequacy reporting as at December 31, 2021 must be done by February 11, 2022.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) announced that the guidelines on the reporting and disclosure of exposures subject to measures COVID-relief measures shall continue to apply until further notice.
The Central Bank of the Philippines (BSP) issued communications covering developments related to online lending platforms, open finance framework and roadmap, and on the expected regulations in the area sustainable finance.
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FED) published the final rule that amends Regulation I to reduce the quarterly reporting burden for member banks by automating the application process for adjusting their subscriptions to the Federal Reserve Bank capital stock, except in the context of mergers.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published its assessment of risks through the quarterly Risk Dashboard and the results of the Autumn edition of the Risk Assessment Questionnaire (RAQ).