Featured Product

    IMF Assesses Financial Stability of the United Republic of Tanzania

    December 04, 2018

    IMF published a report on the Financial System Stability Assessment (FSSA) for the United Republic of Tanzania. Executive Directors concurred with the findings and recommendations of the 2018 FSSA. They welcomed the progress since the 2010 Financial Sector Assessment Program (FSAP), particularly toward strengthening financial prudential regulations and putting in place certain key elements of a framework for monitoring systemic risks and macro-prudential policy responses. To build on this progress and ensure that the Tanzanian financial system is stable, efficient, and inclusive, Directors called for policy action to lower risks and raise resilience of the banking system. In this context, they encouraged the authorities to implement the recommendations of FSSA.

    The FSSA report highlights that the country's bank-dominated financial sector is small, concentrated, and at a relatively nascent stage of development. Financial services provision is dominated by commercial banks, with the ten largest institutions being preeminent in terms of mobilizing savings and "intermediating" credit. Medium-to-small banks rely systematically more on costlier, short-term, interbank financing and institutional deposits and have markedly higher operating costs. Stability analysis suggests that even under a benign baseline economic outlook, solvency positions of government-owned and smaller private banks could come under pressure while the number of under-capitalized institutions may increase. Although the largest banks appear relatively resilient in the face of shocks confidence spillovers under stressed times could increase the adverse impact of shocks on these systemic institutions.

    These vulnerabilities underscore the importance of a strong financial system oversight and policy framework to preserve financial stability. Consideration of additional policy action to lower risks and raise the resilience of the banking system and non-financial firms is recommended. Key priorities include measures to reduce nonperforming loans (NPLs), increase provisioning, increase institutional and systemic buffers to manage domestic and foreign currency liquidity risks, and prompt payment on government-guaranteed loans and resolution of government arrears. The report further notes that assessment against international standards spotlighted areas requiring enhancements to banking supervision. Building on the broadly adequate regulatory framework, priorities to enhance supervisory processes include revising the risk-based supervision framework to introduce a single, non-formulaic risk rating system; implementing the consolidated supervision regulation; and adequately and consistently enforcing prompt corrective action regulations. Directors encouraged further efforts to align the prudential framework with international standards and best practices. They welcomed the authorities’ plans for Basel II/III implementation in line with the East African Community harmonization commitments and encouraged the authorities to advance the framework for identification of domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs).

    The February 2018 circular of the Bank of Tanzania for loan classification and restructuring could present financial stability challenges down the road and should be followed up with further guidance on the criteria for restructuring and upgrading the problem loans. The circular also weakens the framework and policies of the Bank of Tanzania on overseeing problem loan management by providing banks the ability to upgrade the classification of NPLs. It is recommended that the Bank of Tanzania follow up on the circular with further guidance on criteria for such credits to qualify for restructuring and upgrade. Additionally, the report states that financial crises management can be significantly enhanced by operationalizing the existing framework. Development of agency-specific contingency plans by members of the Tanzania Financial Stability Forum and of plans for the use of extraordinary powers to maintain financial stability during a systemic crisis by the Ministry of Finance and Bank of Tanzania is paramount. Operational independence and effectiveness of the Deposit Insurance Board (DIB) would be enhanced by appointing its Board and increasing advanced planning for payouts and liquidation. Bank of Tanzania should require recovery plans from banks and should prepare resolution plans for D-SIBs, once identified.

     

    Related Link: FSSA Report

    Keywords: Middle East and Africa, Tanzania, Banking, Insurance, Macro-prudential Policy, FSAP, FSSA, NPL, D-SIBs, Stress Testing, Bank of Tanzania, IMF

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    BIS Innovation Hub Sets Out Work Program for 2021

    BIS Innovation Hub published the work program for 2021, with focus on suptech and regtech, next-generation financial market infrastructure, central bank digital currencies, open finance, green finance, and cyber security.

    January 22, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EC Plans to Consult on Crisis Management and EDIS Framework Revisions

    In an article published by SRB, Mairead McGuinness, the European Commissioner for Financial Services, Financial Stability, and Capital Markets Union, discussed the progress and next steps toward completion of the Banking Union.

    January 21, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Finalizes Remuneration Standards for Investment Firms in EU

    EBA finalized the two sets of draft regulatory technical standards on the identification of material risk-takers and on the classes of instruments used for remuneration under the Investment Firms Directive (IFD).

    January 21, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ECA Recommends Actions to Enhance Resolution Planning for Banks

    EC published, in the Official Journal of the European Union, a notification that the European Court of Auditors (ECA) has published a special report on resolution planning in the Single Resolution Mechanism.

    January 20, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    BoE Publishes Key Elements of the 2021 Stress Testing for Banks in UK

    BoE published a scenario against which it will be stress testing banks in 2021, in addition to setting out the key elements of the 2021 stress test, guidance on the 2021 stress test, and the variable paths for the 2021 stress test.

    January 20, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    PRA Proposes Rules on Identity Verification of Depositor Protection

    PRA published a consultation paper (CP3/21) proposes rules regarding the timing of identity verification required for eligibility of depositor protection under the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS).

    January 20, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FSB Publishes Work Program for 2021

    FSB published the work program for 2021, which reflects a strategic shift in priorities in the COVID-19 environment.

    January 20, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FCA Issues Update on Move to New Data Collection Platform

    FCA announced that 50% firms have started using the new data collection platform RegData, which is slated to replace the existing platform known Gabriel.

    January 20, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    Bundesbank Publishes Derivation Rules for Reporting by Banks

    Bundesbank published Version 5.0 of the derivation rules for completeness check at the form level, with respect to the data quality of the European harmonized reporting system.

    January 19, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FED Revises Capital Planning and Stress Testing Requirements for Banks

    FED finalized a rule that updates capital planning requirements to reflect the new framework from 2019 that sorts large banks into categories, with requirements that are tailored to the risks of each category.

    January 19, 2021 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 6488