OSFI to Phase Out Special Capital Treatment of COVID-19 Loans at Banks
OSFI announced that it is gradually phasing out the special capital treatment of loan and insurance premium payment deferrals that was provided to banks and insurers at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. The OSFI decision to discontinue the special regulatory capital treatment of deferrals, which permit loan and insurance premium payment deferrals to be treated as performing, reflects the temporary nature of these measures and will ensure that reporting requirements remain accurate in reflecting credit risk. OSFI has published additional details regarding this in a letter that was issued to federally regulated deposit-taking institutions and in the updated frequently asked questions (FAQs) on pandemic-related regulatory measures.
OSFI is announcing the following updates to the special capital treatment of loans subject to payment deferrals:
- Loans granted payment deferrals before August 31 will continue to be treated as performing loans under the Capital Adequacy Requirements (CAR) Guideline for the duration of the deferral, up to a maximum of six calendar months from the effective date of the deferral.
- Loans granted new payment deferrals after August 30 and on or before September 30 will be treated as performing loans under the CAR Guideline for the duration of the deferral, up to a maximum of three calendar months from the approval date of the deferral.
- Loans granted payment deferrals with approval dates after September 30, 2020 will not be eligible for the special capital treatment.
This change supports the accurate measurement of the capital needs of deposit-taking institutions and the long-term integrity of the OSFI capital framework. While the special capital treatment and regulatory flexibility related to payment deferrals was warranted at the onset of COVID-19, as both lenders and borrowers adapted to the extraordinary circumstances and unprecedented disruptions related to the pandemic, banks are now in a better position to employ their business-as-usual alternatives to support troubled borrowers. Thus, the special capital treatment for loans with payment deferrals is no longer warranted and is being phased out through the changes being announced.
Related Links
Keywords: Americas, Canada, Banking, COVID-19, Payment Deferrals, Regulatory Capital, Basel, Credit Risk, FAQ, OSFI
Featured Experts
María Cañamero
Skilled market researcher; growth strategist; successful go-to-market campaign developer
Nicolas Degruson
Works with financial institutions, regulatory experts, business analysts, product managers, and software engineers to drive regulatory solutions across the globe.
Patrycja Oleksza
Applies proficiency and knowledge to regulatory capital and reporting analysis and coordinates business and product strategies in the banking technology area
Related Articles
HKMA Finalizes Policy Modules on Group-Wide Approach and Remuneration
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) revised the Supervisory Policy Manual module CG-5 that sets out guidelines on a sound remuneration system for authorized institutions.
EBA Guide to Monitor Threshold for Intermediate Parent Undertakings
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final guidelines on the monitoring of the threshold and other procedural aspects on the establishment of intermediate parent undertakings in European Union (EU), as laid down in the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD).
PRA Finalizes Approach to Supervision of International Banks
In a recent Market Notice, the Bank of England (BoE) confirmed that green gilts will have equivalent eligibility to existing gilts in its market operations.
FCA Issues PS21/9 on Implementation of Investment Firms Regime
The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) published the policy statement PS21/9 on implementation of the Investment Firms Prudential Regime.
EBA Proposes Regulatory Standards to Identify Shadow Banking Entities
The European Banking Authority (EBA) proposed regulatory technical standards that set out criteria for identifying shadow banking entities for the purpose of reporting large exposures.
IOSCO Proposes Recommendations on ESG Ratings and Data Providers
The Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) proposed a set of recommendations on the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) ratings and data providers.
ESMA Group Issues Recommendations on RFR Switch in Interdealer Market
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) published recommendations from the Working Group on Euro Risk-Free Rates (RFR) on the switch to risk-free rates in the interdealer market.
ECB Study Assesses Impact of Basel III Finalization Package
The European Central Bank (ECB) published a paper as well as an article in the July Macroprudential Bulletin, both of which offer insights on the assessment of the impact of Basel III finalization package on the euro area.
ISDA Finds FRTB Results in Higher Capital Charges for Carbon Trading
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) published a paper that explores the impact of the Fundamental Review of the Trading Book (FRTB) on the trading of carbon certificates.
PRA Updates Remuneration Policy Statement Templates and Tables
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the remuneration policy self-assessment templates and tables on strengthening accountability.
