The European Banking Authority (EBA) published its peer review report on the prudential assessment of qualifying holdings. The review aimed to assess the competent authorities’ application of the European Supervisory Authorities (ESAs) guidelines on the prudential assessment of the acquisition of qualifying holdings. The guidelines define common procedures based on the assessment criteria laid down in the European Union (EU) legislative framework that establishes how acquisitions and increases of qualifying holdings by natural or legal persons in financial institutions should be assessed. According to the peer review, the competent authorities have largely or fully applied the guidelines, which have significantly contributed to the convergence of assessment practices of proposed acquisition or increase of qualifying holdings across EU.
The EBA report presents the Ad hoc Peer Review Committee’s conclusions of the peer review based on the competent authorities' self-assessment of how they apply a selection of the most critical areas of the guidelines. These areas include the notion of acting in concert, significant influence, indirect qualifying holdings, assessment of completeness of the notification and time limits, financial soundness, reputation of the acquirer, and selected aspects relating to the fifth assessment criterion on money laundering/terrorist financing risk. The conclusions illustrated in the EBA report are based on the results of a self-assessment questionnaire addressed to the competent authorities rather than of a full review of the competent authorities’ application of the guidelines.
Based on the peer reviewed findings, the report indicates areas where relevant competent authorities should improve their practices rather than request enforcement measures and the Peer Review Committee reserves the right to request updates on implementation developments. The report also provides early indications as to the areas in which the ESAs guidelines could provide additional guidance to the competent authorities, with a view to fostering convergence of practices. The report also provides early indications as to the areas in which the ESAs guidelines could provide additional guidance to the competent authorities, with a view to fostering convergence of practices. In this regard, the EBA Peer Review Committee suggests that the following improvements could be included in the guidelines:
- Review and enhancement of guidance on the fifth assessment criterion related to money laundering/terrorist financing risk
- Additional guidance on the assessment of large and complex acquisitions, including by—but not limited to—special acquirers like private equity funds, with multiple direct and indirect acquirers or acquirers acting in concert, in order to achieve a more proportionate and efficient assessment. It is also acknowledged that complex transactions with numerous direct and indirect acquirers raise specific challenges for competent authorities, in particular as to the compliance with the strict time limit of two working days set out by Article 22(2) of Capital Requirements Directive (CRD IV) for the assessment of the completeness of the notification
- Review of the guidance on the application of the principle of proportionality
- Review and improvement of the guidance on the content of documents and information to be provided with an application, in order to speed up the pre-application phase, for example in respect of the expectations of the content and assessment of the business plan.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Banking, Peer Review, Qualifying Holdings, CRD IV, Basel, ML/TF Risk, Proportionality, ESAs, EBA
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published four draft principles to support supervisory efforts in assessing the representativeness of COVID-19-impacted data for banks using the internal ratings based (IRB) credit risk models.
The European Council and the European Parliament (EP) reached a provisional political agreement on the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD).
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) launched a consultation (CP6/22) that sets out proposal for a new Supervisory Statement on expectations for management of model risk by banks.
The European Commission (EC) published the Delegated Regulation 2022/954, which amends regulatory technical standards on specification of the calculation of specific and general credit risk adjustments.
The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) Innovation Hub updated its work program, announcing a set of projects across various centers.
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published two consultation papers—one on the supervisory statement on exclusions related to systemic events and the other on the supervisory statement on the management of non-affirmative cyber exposures.
Certain members of the U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs issued a letter to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
The European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) published a consultation paper on the advice on the review of the securitization prudential framework in Solvency II.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) issued a statement on PRA buffer adjustment while the Bank of England (BoE) published a notice on the statistical reporting requirements for banks.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) issued principles for the effective management and supervision of climate-related financial risks.