Featured Product

    IMF Working Paper on the Nature of Regulatory Capital Requirements

    August 04, 2017

    IMF published a working paper that compares the regulatory capital requirements under the Dodd-Frank Act and the 10% leverage ratio, as proposed by the U.S. Treasury and the U.S. House of Representatives' Financial CHOICE Act (FCA). The paper also highlights the potential for regulatory arbitrage by banks and the associated moral hazard problem that arises due to the option of the FCA qualifying banking organizations.

    The paper undertakes certain exercises to assess the qualifying banks option. It uses balance sheet data on the types of banks (by asset size) that would qualify for the off-ramp under the FCA and estimates how much capital banks would need to add to qualify for the “off-ramp” regulation. Then, to surmise whether there could be a self-selection of more risk-prone banks in the off-ramp, the paper analyzes the balance sheet characteristics of banks with a relatively small capital gap to the 10% leverage ratio. The analysis identifies an important moral hazard problem that arises due to the qualifying banks' optionality, where banks are likely to increase the riskiness of their asset portfolio and qualify for the FCA “off-ramp” relief, with unintended effects on financial stability. This moral hazard problem would manifest through banks increasing the RWA imprint in their balance sheet through increased risk taking, thereby qualifying for the “off-ramp” regulatory relief, under which banks hold 10% leverage ratio while enjoying higher expected returns and lower regulatory costs. This would make the banks riskier and, due to smaller capital buffers, less resilient to adverse shocks.

     

    However, the results show that small banks (total assets below USD 3 billion) with capital gaps to the qualifying banks threshold would tend not to opt for the “off-ramp.” Despite the stated intention of policymakers to provide regulatory relief for small banks under the proposed FCA, this paper concludes that these banks would opt to stay under the existing Dodd-Frank Act regime. Investors and the market would expect large and globally active banks to meet modern regulatory standards. Also, banks that can have large maturity mismatches and a fewer share of highly liquid assets than demanded under the Dodd-Frank Act or Basel III would be less attractive as a counterpart in the interbank market. Finally, it is also clear that reliance on regulation alone (Pillar 1) cannot be sufficient. Supervisors (Pillar 2) need to continue to increase market discipline (Pillar 3) and transparency, and help financial institutions increase internal risk management capacity and capital planning.

     

    Related Link: Working Paper (PDF)

    Keywords: Americas, United States of America, Banking, Dodd Frank Act, Basel III, Capital Requirements, Regulatory Arbitrage, IMF

    Featured Experts
    Related Articles
    News

    SEC Finalizes Capital and Margin Requirements for Security-Based Swaps

    SEC adopted a package of rules and rule amendments to establish capital, margin, and segregation requirements for security-based swaps, under Title VII of the Dodd-Frank Act.

    August 22, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    ECB Revises Prudential Provisioning Expectations for New NPEs

    ECB is revising its supervisory expectations for prudential provisioning of new non-performing exposures (NPEs) specified in the “Addendum to the ECB Guidance to banks on non-performing loans” (Addendum)

    August 22, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    CFTC Proposes to Revise Information Collection on Margin Requirements

    CFTC is requesting comments on the burdens associated with certain aspects of the Margin Requirements for Uncleared Swaps for Swap Dealers and Major Swap Participants (final rule).

    August 21, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FASB to Delay Effective Date for Insurance Contracts Standard

    FASB issued a proposed Accounting Standards Update that would grant all insurance companies that issue long-duration contracts, such as life insurance and annuities, additional time to apply the standard that addresses this area of financial reporting.

    August 21, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA Publishes Phase 2 of Technical Package on Reporting Framework 2.9

    EBA published phase 2 of its technical package on the reporting framework 2.9, which includes validation rules, Data Point Model (DPM) data dictionary, and XBRL taxonomies.

    August 21, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FSB Publishes Responses to Its Consultation Related to SME Financing

    FSB published responses received to the consultation on a report on the evaluation of the effects of financial regulatory reforms on small and medium-sized enterprise (SME) financing.

    August 21, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    APRA Revises Related Entities Standard for Banks

    APRA published a strengthened prudential standard APS 222 on associations with related entities, with the aim to mitigate contagion risk within banking groups.

    August 20, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    EBA and ESMA Issue Joint Response to EC Letter on Crypto-Assets

    EBA and ESMA issued a joint response to the EC letter, from July 19, 2019, on crypto-assets.

    August 20, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FSB on Responses to Consultation on Wind-Down of Trading Portfolios

    FSB published responses received to the consultation on the solvent wind-down of the derivatives and trading book portfolio of a global systemically important bank (G-SIB).

    August 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    News

    FSB Publishes Responses to Consultation on Resolvability Disclosures

    FSB published responses received to the consultation on disclosures for resolution planning and resolvability of banks.

    August 19, 2019 WebPage Regulatory News
    RESULTS 1 - 10 OF 3681