MAS published an information paper that highlights the observations from thematic inspections of enterprise-wide risk assessment (EWRA) in the area of money laundering and terrorism financing (ML/TF). The paper also sets out the supervisory expectations for effective EWRA frameworks and processes that financial institutions should benchmark themselves against. The review analyzed the inherent ML/TF risk profile of selected banks, the effectiveness of the control environment designed to mitigate those risks, and the need to implement additional measures to manage residual risks where necessary. The thematic inspections of MAS show that banks have room to improve the rigor of management oversight of EWRA processes, the robustness of the design of EWRA methodologies, and the effectiveness of EWRA implementation.
The thematic inspections of selected banks were conducted in the first quarter of 2020. The inspected banks generally have established frameworks and processes to conduct the EWRA, in accordance with the requirements set out in MAS Notice 626 and the Guidelines to MAS Notice 626. Robustness of the risk assessment was, however, uneven across the inspected banks. Some banks have established good practices, such as utilizing good quantitative analysis tools to detect ML/TF risks, that the industry can emulate. Others have room to enhance the rigor of management oversight of the risk-assessment processes, the robustness of risk-assessment methodologies, and the effectiveness of risk-assessment implementation. Banks have taken, or are taking, remedial actions to improve their frameworks and processes. MAS will continue to engage financial institutions to promote best practices and maintain high anti-money laundering and countering financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) standards in the industry.
As part of the supervisory expectations, MAS expects the board and senior management of institutions to demonstrate good understanding of the underlying objectives of the EWRA, and set the appropriate tone from the top to instill an appreciation of these objectives among staff. MAS also expects the board and senior management to ensure that the EWRA frameworks and methodologies are sound and implemented effectively to meet the underlying objectives of the EWRA. While the paper is based on MAS’ thematic inspections of banks, the desired outcomes and good practices are relevant and applicable to other types of financial institutions. The paper presents the following desired outcomes based on key observations:
- Banks’ senior management maintain active oversight of EWRA frameworks and processes, including ensuring compliance with the relevant MAS Notices and Guidelines.
- Banks have sound and systematic frameworks and processes to assess inherent risks, control effectiveness, and address residual risks for each business line.
- Banks perform adequate and accurate qualitative and quantitative analyses in assessing risks.
- Banks assess effectiveness of controls, taking into account policies and procedures, control testing results, and insights from the banks’ assessments of their cultures.
- Banks have systematic processes to establish and implement control measures to address areas for improvement identified from the EWRA exercise.
- Banks have structured processes to perform gap analysis against guidance papers and incorporate lessons learned and good industry practices in their own processes.
Keywords: Asia Pacific, Singapore, Banking, ML/TF, AML/CFT, Enterprise Wide Risk Assessment, Operational Risk, Compliance Risk, Governance, Basel, MAS
Previous ArticleMAS Awards SRFB Privileges to Standard Chartered Bank in Singapore
PRA published a statement that explains when to expect further information on the PRA approach to transposing the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5), including its approach to revisions to the definition of capital for Pillar 2A.
SRB published the work program for 2021-2023, setting out a roadmap to further operationalize the Single Resolution Fund and to achieve robust resolvability of banks under its remit over the next three years.
EIOPA is consulting on the relevant ratios to be mandatorily disclosed by insurers and reinsurers falling within the scope of the Non-Financial Reporting Directive as well as on the methodologies to build these ratios.
ECB finalized guidance on the way it expects banks to prudently manage and transparently disclose climate and other environmental risks under the current prudential rules.
BCBS published a technical amendment to the capital treatment of securitizations of non-performing loans by banks.
BoE announced that the Data and Statistics Division is planning to move collection of statistical data to the BoE Electronic Data Submission (BEEDS) portal.
APRA published the updated reporting standards and guidance for the collection of Economic and Financial Statistics (EFS), following a consultation process. Also published was a response letter to the feedback received on the proposal for amending the EFS reporting standards and guidance.
EC is consulting on a draft delegated regulation to supplement the Taxonomy Regulation (2020/852) by establishing the technical screening criteria for determining the conditions under which an economic activity qualifies as environmentally sustainable.
The IFRS Foundation published material highlighting the ways in which existing requirements in IFRS standards require companies to consider climate-related matters when their effect is material to the financial statements.
FSB published a progress report on the implementation of reforms to major interest rate benchmarks, including the London Inter-bank Offered Rate (LIBOR) benchmark.