OSFI launched a consultation to explore ways to enhance the OSFI assurance over capital, leverage, and liquidity returns for banks and insurers, given the increasing complexity arising from the evolving regulatory reporting framework due to IFRS 17 (Insurance Contracts) standard and Basel III reforms. The aim is to engage stakeholders, including the federally regulated financial institutions, in a dialog with OSFI, to proactively enhance and align assurance expectations over key regulatory returns that contribute to the OSFI assessment of the safety and soundness of institutions. The comment period for this consultation ends on June 18, 2021, with a draft guideline expected to be published for consultation by Fall 2021. OSFI is proposing for the enhanced assurance expectations be effective by fiscal 2023 for deposit-taking institutions and by fiscal 2022 for federally regulated insurers.
At present, OSFI has a range of assurance expectations for capital, leverage, and liquidity returns. For deposit-taking institutions using the internal ratings-based approach for credit risk, senior management submits an annual attestation for compliance with minimum regulatory requirements for regulatory capital models and an internal audit opinion is submitted for approved regulatory capital models. For deposit-takers using the standardized approach for credit risk, the internal audit function also performs a periodic review of the Basel Capital Adequacy Return (BCAR) that is submitted to the Lead Supervisors of OSFI. OSFI now also proposes to have the assurance expectations apply to the capital, leverage and liquidity returns of all federally regulated deposit-taking institutions.
The regulatory returns in scope for domestic systemically important banks (D-SIBs) and small and medium-size deposit-taking institutions (SMSBs) include the BCAR, Leverage Requirements Return (LRR), and liquidity returns for the Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR), Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR), Net Cumulative Cash Flow (NCCF), and the Operating Cash Flow Statement (OCFS). Consistent with the proposed SMSBs’ Capital and Liquidity Requirements, the assurance expectations for SMSBs do not apply to foreign bank branches. The associated guidelines include the Capital Adequacy Requirements (CAR), Leverage Requirements (LR), Total Loss Absorbing Capacity (TLAC), and Liquidity Adequacy Requirements (LAR). The OSFI initiative to advance proportionality in the capital and liquidity regime for SMSBs includes proposed changes to the SMSB Pillar 1 capital and liquidity frameworks. Therefore, OSFI is proposing that the assurance expectations complement the proportionality initiative to reflect the size, nature, complexity, and business activities of SMSBs.
Moreover, certain external audit requirements exist in most insurance guidelines but not in the CAR, LR, TLAC, and LAR guidelines for federally regulated deposit-taking institutions; however, senior management submits an annual attestation for compliance with minimum regulatory requirements for regulatory capital models and internal audit performs a periodic review of the BCAR. Therefore, OSFI proposes to better align external audit requirements between the insurance and deposit-taking industries. OSFI also proposes to require an annual internal audit opinion on the accuracy and completeness of key regulatory returns, which includes a conclusion on the effectiveness of internal controls. The internal audit may be completed at any time during the fiscal year. The proposals in this area aim to reduce misstatements on the regulatory returns by relying on the third line of defense to enhance governance and controls.
Comment Due Date: June 18, 2021
Keywords: Americas, Canada, Banking, Basel III, Internal Audit, Materiality, Reporting, Proportionality, Internal Control, External Audit, Compliance Risk, Regulatory Capital, Liquidity Risk, Leverage Ratio, OSFI
The European Commission (EC) announced plans to defer the application of 13 regulatory technical standards under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (2019/2088) by six months, from January 01, 2022 to July 01, 2022.
The Bank of England (BoE) published a consultation paper on approach to setting minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL), an operational guide on executing bail-in, and a statement from the Deputy Governor Dave Ramsden.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) is seeking preliminary input on standardization of the proportionality assessment methodology for credit institutions and investment firms.
Certain regulatory authorities in the US are extending period for completion of the review of certain residential mortgage provisions and for publication of notice disclosing the determination of this review until December 20, 2021.
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published the policy statement PS18/21, which introduces an amendment in the definition of "higher paid material risk taker" in the Remuneration Part of the PRA Rulebook.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published its annual report on asset encumbrance in banking sector.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published a methodological guide to mystery shopping.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) released a letter to authorized deposit-taking institutions to provide an update on key policy settings for the capital framework reforms, which will come into effect from January 01, 2023.
The Committee on Payments and Market Infrastructures (CPMI) and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO) published a report that assesses the business continuity planning activities of financial market infrastructures or FMIs.
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has responded to the IFRS consultation on targeted amendments to the IFRS Foundation constitution to accommodate an International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) to set IFRS Sustainability Standards.