EIOPA published a report on the use of exemptions and limitations from regular supervisory reporting, by national competent authorities, under Solvency II, during 2019 and the first quarter of 2020. The report, following the approach taken last year, illustrates the way proportionality is implemented in the reporting reflecting the nature, scale, and complexity of risks inherent to the business, in this case the number of templates reported by different-sized companies. Nearly twice as many templates are reported from large undertakings than from smaller ones for quarterly reporting. On an annual basis, the 10 largest undertakings by total assets had to fill in on average of 36 templates, while the 10 smallest undertakings had to complete only 26 templates in total.
Twelve national competent authorities granted limitations to 833 solo undertakings for the first quarterly reporting in 2020 (compared with 13 national competent authorities and 838 solo undertakings in first quarter of 2019). Regarding annual reporting for solo undertakings, five national competent authorities (five in 2018) granted limitations and exemptions from reporting using the item-by-item templates to 125 solo undertakings in 2019 (136 in 2018). With regard to groups, four national competent authorities (five in the first quarter of 2019) granted limitations and exemptions to 55 groups for the quarterly reporting of 2020 (compared to 37 in the first quarter of 2019) while one national competent authority (two in 2019) granted limitations and exemptions from annual reporting to six groups in 2019 (for six groups in 2018). In 2019, the majority of national competent authorities reported no major changes in granting the authorization to use limitations and exemptions from reporting. Formal policies are not in place and national competent authorities continue to grant limitations and exemptions on a case-by-case basis.
The limitations and exemptions on reporting foreseen in Article 35 of the Solvency II Directive are a concrete proportionality measure in reporting requirements. However, they should not be seen as the only proportionality measure. Reporting requirements also reflect a natural embedded proportionality directly connected to the nature, scale, and complexity of the business. In addition, risk-based thresholds are included in the reporting implementing technical standard.
Keywords: Europe, EU, Insurance, Solvency II, Proportionality, National Competent Authorities, Reporting, Exemptions, Limitations, EIOPA
Previous ArticleCBIRC and PBC Proposed Regulations for Systemically Important Banks
EC published the Implementing Regulation 2021/763 that lays down implementing technical standards for supervisory reporting and public disclosure of the minimum requirement for own funds and eligible liabilities (MREL).
APRA announced the standardization of quarterly reporting due dates for authorized deposit-taking institutions.
The private sector working group of ECB on euro risk-free rates published the recommendations to address events that would trigger fallbacks in the Euro Interbank Offered Rate (EURIBOR)-related contracts, along with the €STR-based EURIBOR fallback rates (rates that could be used if a fallback is triggered).
Bundesbank published a list of "EntryPoints" that are accepted in its reporting system; the list provides taxonomy version and name of the module against each EntryPoint.
EBA published the phase 1 of its reporting framework 3.1, with the technical package covering the new reporting requirements for investment firms (under the implementing technical standards on investment firms reporting).
Asia Pacific Australia Banking APS 111 Capital Adequacy Regulatory Capital Basel RBNZ APRA
ESMA published the final guidelines on outsourcing to cloud service providers.
EBA published annual data for two key concepts and indicators in the Deposit Guarantee Schemes (DGS) Directive—available financial means and covered deposits.
OSFI has set out the schedule for release of draft guidance on the management of technology risks by federally regulated financial institutions and private pension plans.
MAS updated rules for new housing loans by banks and finance companies.