At a conference in London, David Rule, the Executive Director of Insurance at BoE offered an update on progress toward a global Insurance Capital Standard (ICS) and discussed the fledgling UK market for Insurance-Linked Securities and the new insurers unit of BoE. He also reiterated the messages on underwriting and reserving in wholesale insurance and reinsurance markets from Anna Sweeney’s Dear CEO letter earlier this year, discussed capital management, shared data on the sensitivity of the capital surpluses of UK life insurers to various market movements, and encouraged more consistency in disclosure of sensitivities by insurers and the drivers of changes in their capital positions over time.
Mr. Rule emphasized that BoE supports the development of international regulatory standards, such as the ICS. As both a home supervisor of UK insurance groups with businesses worldwide and a host supervisor of branches and subsidiaries of insurance groups from many different countries, he also welcomed the monitoring period (starting in 2020) approach of IAIS. During this period, the Internationally Active Insurance Groups will report a reference ICS confidentially to their group-wide supervisors, including for discussion in regulatory colleges. This will give regulatory colleges a common language for measuring group risk and defining capital. He said: "No capital framework is perfect and ICS will be no different. But having agreement on common metrics will be a big step forward. It should further enhance supervisory cooperation and help build trust. Over time, it might reduce the need for multiple overlapping practices in measuring the same risks and help to limit fragmentation of capital requirements."
PRA will also be alert to insurers seeking to reduce capital requirements through aggressive changes to internal models or over-optimistic business plans, suggested Mr. Rule. This includes using the internal model output data to compare across insurers and monitoring model "drift" indicators, such as the ratio of internal model to standard formula capital requirements. He added that during a roundtable with insurance analysts and investors on disclosure around a year ago, it was found that insurers find Solvency II disclosures more useful than accounting disclosures, at least in the current state of insurance accounting. A consistent set of market sensitivities was near the top of their disclosure wish list. He added that he hopes that insurers and industry groups will work toward an industry standard in this area, perhaps drawing on what they already report.
He mentioned market risk sensitivities and a Solvency II "P&L" as the two areas where insurers could improve the quality and consistency of disclosures. He used the term "Solvency II P&L" to refer to the drivers of the change in insurers' Solvency Capital Requirement (SCR) coverage ratio from one reporting date to another. However, Solvency II does not address measurement of changes in capital position over time. There is a reporting gap and insurers are closing it with their own content, leading to a mixed picture across the sector. Again, this is an area where insurers and industry groups could usefully develop some template approaches. He added that it is a concern that we still see evidence of analysts and investors not fully understanding Solvency II balance sheets of insurers. In more stressed market conditions complexity and lack of transparency might lead investors to turn away from regulatory measures of risk and rely on simpler but cruder approaches. However, progress toward an international capital standard should help with this.
Related Link: Speech
Keywords: Europe, UK, Insurance, Solvency II, Disclosures, SCR, Insurance Supervision, BoE
Previous ArticleECB Publishes Guidance Notes to Reporting Agents on SHS Regulation
PRA published the policy statement PS8/21, which contains the final supervisory statement SS3/21 on the PRA approach to supervision of the new and growing non-systemic banks in UK.
EBA published a report that sets out the final draft regulatory technical standards specifying the conditions according to which consolidation shall be carried out in line with Article 18 of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
EBA updated the list of other systemically important institutions (O-SIIs) in EU.
BCBS published two reports that discuss transmission channels of climate-related risks to the banking system and the measurement methodologies of climate-related financial risks.
UK Authorities (FCA and PRA) welcomed the findings of FSB peer review on the implementation of financial sector remuneration reforms in the UK.
PRA and FCA jointly issued a letter that highlights risks associated with the increasing volumes of deposits that are placed with banks and building societies via deposit aggregators and how to mitigate these risks.
MFSA announced that amendments to the Banking Act, Subsidiary Legislation, and Banking Rules will be issued in the coming months, to transpose the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD5) into the national regulatory framework.
EC finalized the Delegated Regulation 2021/598 that supplements the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR or 575/2013) and lays out the regulatory technical standards for assigning risk-weights to specialized lending exposures.
OSFI launched a consultation to explore ways to enhance the OSFI assurance over capital, leverage, and liquidity returns for banks and insurers, given the increasing complexity arising from the evolving regulatory reporting framework due to IFRS 17 (Insurance Contracts) standard and Basel III reforms.
ECB published results of the benchmarking analysis of the recovery plan cycle for 2019.