FED launched a proposal to establish risk-based capital requirements for depository institution holding companies that are significantly engaged in insurance activities. Under the proposed framework, known as the Building Block Approach or BBA, holding companies significantly engaged in insurance activities would be required to aggregate their state-based capital requirements into a consolidated requirement. The proposal would establish both minimum requirements and a buffer on top of the minimum. Comments on the proposal will be accepted until December 23, 2019. FED also published a white paper that explains the methodology being proposed to adjust for the differences between different state-based insurance capital requirements and bank capital requirements.
The proposal would also revise reporting requirements for depository institution holding companies significantly engaged in insurance activities. FED proposes to implement a new reporting form for use in the Building Block Approach. The proposed reporting form, titled “Capital Requirements for Board Regulated Institutions Significantly Engaged in Insurance Activities” (Form FR Q-1), and instructions focus on information needed to perform the Building Block Approach calculations. The proposed Form FR Q-1 is not intended to be exhaustive in terms of addressing supervisory needs other than the needs for the Building Block Approach. The vast majority of the information reported to FED through the proposed reporting form would not be public. The information that FED proposes to make public would consist of the building block available capital, building block capital requirement, and Building Block Approach ratio for the top-tier parent of an insurance depository institution holding company’s enterprise. The proposed effective date for the reporting form is January 2021.
The Building Block Approach accounts for risks that are specific to the business of insurance and is different from the calculations used for bank capital requirements. However, the minimum standard under the Building Block Approach would be comparable to one of the key measures of bank health, the minimum total capital ratio, which is set at 8% for banks. The proposal builds on comments received on a conceptual proposal from June 2016 that described the Building Block Approach. FED supervises depository institution holding companies, including those significantly engaged in insurance activities and the Board currently oversees eight firms. Their insurance activities include life, title, and property and casualty, and the firms range in size from less than USD 10 billion in total assets to more than USD 250 billion. The proposal builds on existing state-based insurance standards while establishing minimum capital requirements that are specific to the business of insurance. As part of the proposal, the Board will conduct a quantitative impact study of the Building Block Approach to better inform the framework.
The accompanying white paper describes the FED attempt to identify and evaluate different scaling methodologies. FED finds that the probability of default (PD) approach based on historical data could be used to translate information between regimes in a way that preserves the economic meaning of solvency ratios. This method, however, requires data that are not currently available for some regimes outside of the United States. The election of the scaling approach is, therefore, a choice between using a single simple approach to scaling in all economies or differentiating the scaling approach by country and using the historical PD domestically. FED recommends the latter approach. Although this approach will involve more work and some uncertainty for companies operating in countries with limited data, it should allow for scaling that is more accurate and aid comparability.
- Press Release
- Proposed Rule
- Comparison of Regulatory Frameworks (PDF)
- Reporting Form (XLSX)
- Reporting Instructions (PDF)
Comment Due Date: December 23, 2019
Keywords: Americas, US, Insurance, Capital Requirements, Building Block Approach, Reporting, FR Q-1, Risk-based Capital, Scaling Methodologies, FED
Previous ArticleCBUAE Consults on Framework for Real Estate Exposures of Banks
In a letter addressed to the industry, the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) set out an updated schedule of policy priorities for the banking, insurance, and superannuation industries.
The European Commission (EC) adopted a comprehensive review package of Solvency II rules in the European Union.
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued Versions 1.0 of the "Earnings" and "Regulatory Reporting" booklets of the Comptroller's Handbook.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published results of its economy-wide climate stress test, which aimed to assess the resilience of non-financial corporates and euro area banks to climate risks.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published a report on the use of digital platforms in the banking and payments sector in European Union.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) published updates on the policy measures that were announced in context of the ongoing pandemic.
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA), along with several other associations, submitted a joint response to the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) consultation on preliminary proposals for the prudential treatment of cryptoasset exposures.
BIS published the September issue of the Quarterly Review, which contains special features that analyze the rapid rise in equity funding for financial technology firms, the effectiveness of policy measures in response to pandemic, and the evolution of international banking.
The Basel Committee for Banking Supervision (BCBS) met in September 2021 and reviewed climate-related financial risks, discussed impact of digitalization, and welcomed efforts by the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) Foundation to develop a common set of sustainability reporting standards
The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) issued a Cease and Desist Order against MUFG Union Bank for deficiencies in technology and operational risk governance.