EIOPA published a statement outlining actions toward mitigating the impact of COVID-19 on the insurance sector in EU. EIOPA emphasized that insurance companies should be ready to implement the necessary measures to ensure business continuity and the national competent authorities should be flexible regarding the timing of supervisory reporting and public disclosure for the end of 2019. EIOPA plans to coordinate the specifics of the approach with the competent authorities. In the short term, EIOPA will limit its requests of information and the consultations to the industry to essential elements needed to assess and monitor the impact of the current situation in the market. EIOPA is also extending the deadline of the Holistic Impact Assessment for the 2020 Solvency II Review by two months, to June 01, 2020.
In the coming days, EIOPA will communicate details on postponing additional reporting and information requirements. Furthermore, the Solvency II framework includes a number of tools that can be used to mitigate risks and impact to the sector. EIOPA and the national competent authorities stand ready to implement these tools, if and when necessary, in a coordinated manner, to ensure that policyholders remain protected and financial stability is safeguarded. Nevertheless, insurance companies should take measures to preserve their capital position in balance with the protection of the insured, following prudent dividend and other distribution policies, including variable remuneration. Notwithstanding existing tools and powers, and together with national authorities and the other ESAs and ESRB, EIOPA will continue to monitor the situation and will take or propose to EU institutions any measure necessary to mitigate the impact of market volatility to the stability of the insurance sector in Europe and safeguard the protection of policyholders.
Under Solvency II, EU insurance companies are required to hold sufficient eligible own funds on an ongoing basis to cover their Solvency Capital Requirement. The risk-based Solvency Capital Requirement enables insurance undertakings to absorb significant losses and give confidence to policyholders and beneficiaries that payments will be made as they fall due. Furthermore, the Solvency II framework includes a ladder of supervisory intervention between the Solvency Capital Requirement and the Minimum Capital Requirement, which is the minimum level of security below which a company’s financial resources should not fall. This allows for flexibility in cases of extreme situations, including measures to extend the recovery period of affected insurers, for example, as foreseen by Article 138 of the Solvency II Directive. Moreover, recent stress tests have shown that the sector is well capitalized and able to withhold severe but plausible shocks to the system. Nevertheless, insurance companies should take measures to preserve their capital position in balance with the protection of the insured, following prudent dividend and other distribution policies, including variable remuneration.
Related Link: Statement
Keywords: Europe, EU, Insurance, COVID-19, Solvency II, Business Continuity, SCR, Stress Testing, Operational Risk, EIOPA
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) released the final Prudential Practice Guide on management of climate change financial risks (CPG 229) for banks, insurers, and superannuation trustees.
The European Council adopted its position on two proposals that are part of the digital finance package adopted by the European Commission in September 2020, with one of the proposals involving the regulation on markets in crypto-assets (MiCA) and the other involving the Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA).
The Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) is proposing, via the consultation paper CP21/21, to apply group provisions in the Operational Resilience Part of the PRA Rulebook (relevant for the Capital Requirements Regulation or CRR firms) to holding companies.
The European Commission (EC) has adopted a package of measures related to the Capital Markets Union.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published the final report on draft regulatory technical standards for the calculation of risk-weighted exposure amounts of collective investment undertakings or CIUs, in line with the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FED) published a report that summarizes banking conditions in the United States, along with the supervisory and regulatory activities of FED.
The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) recently completed two pilot initiatives in its 2020-2024 Cyber Security Strategy, which was published in November 2020.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published further information related to its 2021 assessment of global systemically important banks (G-SIBs), with additional details to help understand the scoring methodology.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) is consulting on an Accounting Standards Update and the associated taxonomy improvements for requirements on troubled debt restructurings and vintage disclosures under the credit losses standard (for financial instruments) topic 326.
US Agencies issued a statement that summarizes the work undertaken during the interagency policy sprints focused on crypto-assets and provides a roadmap of future work related to crypto-assets.