The BoE Governor Mark Carney spoke at the Scottish Economics Conference about the impact of developments in money and payments technologies, how BoE is helping to manage the related potential risks, and how well crypto currencies fulfil the roles of money. He also examined the need to regulate crypto currencies or crypto-assets.
According to the BoE Governor, the most fundamental reason to be skeptical about the longer term value of crypto currencies is that it is not clear the extent to which they will ever become effective media of exchange. Even though their prospects of replacing fiat money are tenuous at best, crypto currencies are of growing interest to policymakers, many of whom prefer to term them crypto-assets expressly because they are not true currencies. At present, crypto-assets raise a host of issues around consumer and investor protection, market integrity, money laundering, terrorism financing, tax evasion, and the circumvention of capital controls and international sanctions. The Financial Policy Committee of BoE is considering the risks posed to UK financial stability. Moreover, internationally, FSB will report to the G20 in Argentina later this month on the financial stability implications of crypto-assets. He added that “At present, in my view, crypto-assets do not appear to pose material risks to financial stability.”
Authorities must decide whether to isolate, regulate, or integrate crypto-assets and their associated activities. A few jurisdictions have banned crypto-assets outright. Some regulators have sealed off crypto-assets from the core of the financial system to curtail risk of contagion. Most prominently, China—which had been one of the most active crypto-asset markets—recently banned exchanges, financial institutions and payment processors from handling them. If widely adopted, however, isolation risks foregoing potentially major opportunities from the development of the underlying payments technologies. A better path would be to regulate elements of the crypto-asset ecosystem to combat illicit activities, promote market integrity, and protect the safety and soundness of the financial system. He said that “The time has come to hold the crypto-asset ecosystem to the same standards as the rest of the financial system” and “holding crypto-asset exchanges to the same rigorous standards as those that trade securities would address a major underlap in the regulatory approach.” He concluded that bringing crypto-assets onto a level regulatory playing field could catalyze private innovation to create a more resilient, effective payments system.
Related Link: Speech (PDF)
Previous ArticleBoE Working Paper on Capital Regulation and Product Market Outcomes
ECB finalized the guide on assessment methodology for the internal model method for calculating exposure to counterparty credit risk (CCR) and the advanced method for own funds requirements for credit valuation adjustment (A-CVA) risk.
EBA published an Opinion addressed to EC to raise awareness about the opportunity to clarify certain issues related to the definition of credit institution in the upcoming review of the Capital Requirements Directive and Regulation (CRD and CRR).
APRA is consulting on updates to ARS 210.0, the reporting standard that sets out requirements for provision of information on liquidity and funding of an authorized deposit-taking institution.
FED released hypothetical scenarios for a second round of stress tests for banks.
PRA published updates in relation to the 2021 Supervisory Benchmarking Portfolio exercise.
FED adopted a proposal to extend for three years, with revision, the capital assessments and stress testing reports (FR Y-14A/Q/M; OMB No. 7100-0341).
HKMA revised the Supervisory Policy Manual module CR-G-14 on margin and other risk mitigation standards for non-centrally cleared over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives transactions.
EBA issued a revised list of validation rules with respect to the implementing technical standards on supervisory reporting.
EBA published its response to the call for advice of EC on ways to strengthen the EU legal framework on anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT).
NGFS published a paper on the overview of environmental risk analysis by financial institutions and an occasional paper on the case studies on environmental risk analysis methodologies.