IASB published a summary of its June meeting, including the preliminary decisions of the Board. IASB met on June 25, 2020 to discuss the feedback on its exposure draft on interest rate benchmark reform. The exposure draft proposed amendments to IAS 39 and IFRS 9, the old and new standards on financial instruments, respectively; IFRS 7 on disclosures of financial instruments; IFRS 4 on insurance contracts; and IFRS 16 on leases. This is Phase 2 of the IASB project on interest rate benchmark reform. The Board tentatively decided to finalize the effective date proposed in the exposure draft—that is, entities would be required to apply the amendments for annual periods beginning on or after January 01, 2021, with earlier application permitted.
At its meeting, the Board tentatively decided to:
- Finalize without substantial changes the proposals set out in the draft amendments to IFRS 9, IFRS 4, and IFRS 16, with respect to modifications of financial assets and financial liabilities.
- Finalize the proposals in the exposure draft related to the changes required to hedging relationships and clarify that the changes to the hedging relationships have to be made by the end of the reporting period, during which uncertainty with respect to a specific element of the relationship has been resolved.
- Finalize the proposals in the exposure draft, subject to clarifying that the 24-month period applies to the individual alternative benchmark rate and hence begins from the date that an entity designates a particular alternative benchmark rate as the hedged risk for the first time.
- Finalize the transition requirements proposed in the exposure draft with one change to the requirement for reinstating particular discontinued hedging relationships.
- Finalize the proposed amendments in paragraphs 24I–24J of the exposure draft, related to disclosures, subject to changing the amendment proposed in paragraph 24J(b) and deleting the disclosure requirement proposed in paragraph 24J(c) of the exposure draft.
- Clarify that, for the changes required to a hedging instrument, modifications required by the interest rate benchmark reform could be made in ways other than by modifying the contractual terms of the hedging instrument. This could be made as long as the hedging instrument is not de-recognized and the outcome is economically equivalent to modifying the hedging instrument to refer to an alternative benchmark rate.
- Make no substantial changes to the proposals in the exposure draft in response to issues related to classification of financial assets and embedded derivatives.
At the July 2020 Board meeting, IASB plans to discuss feedback on the proposals, in the exposure draft, on accounting for qualifying hedging relationships and groups of items, as well as any sweep issues that may arise. IASB will also discuss beginning the balloting process for the amendments.
Keywords: International, Accounting, Banking, Securities, Insurance, IBOR, Interest Rate Benchmarks, Financial Instruments, IFRS 9, IAS 39, Hedging, Disclosures, Insurance Contracts, IASB
Previous ArticleFCA Further Extends Deadlines for Certain Returns Amid COVID Crisis
The European Banking Authority (EBA) proposed implementing technical standards on the interest rate risk in the banking book (IRRBB) reporting requirements, with the comment period ending on May 02, 2023.
The U.S. Federal Reserve Board (FED) set out details of the pilot climate scenario analysis exercise to be conducted among the six largest U.S. bank holding companies.
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FED) adopted the final rule on Adjustable Interest Rate (LIBOR) Act.
The European Central Bank (ECB) published an updated list of supervised entities, a report on the supervision of less significant institutions (LSIs), a statement on macro-prudential policy.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) published a circular on the prudential treatment of crypto-asset exposures, an update on the status of transition to new interest rate benchmarks.
The European Commission (EC) adopted the standards addressing supervisory reporting of risk concentrations and intra-group transactions, benchmarking of internal approaches, and authorization of credit institutions.
The China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission (CBIRC) issued rules to manage the risk of off-balance sheet business of commercial banks and rules on corporate governance of financial institutions.
The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) made announcements to address sustainability issues in the financial sector.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published regulatory standards on identification of a group of connected clients (GCC) as well as updated the lists of identified financial conglomerates.
The General Board of the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB), at its December meeting, issued an updated risk assessment via the quarterly risk dashboard and held discussions on key policy priorities to address the systemic risks in the European Union.